Because Rodgers' points have merit to them, he backed them up with evidence, and he wasn't yelling and screaming about it. His tone was calm, sensible, and measured.Getting past the "who has more power/leverage/etc." debate between the Packers vs. Rodgers.
I am wondering why so many people seem to be on the pro-Rodgers side.
Is it a case of "pro-player/anti-management-ownership" perspective that a lot of people have?
In a lot of cases in sports, it seems like many people side with players, because they are seen as less greedy or more likeable. So I am wondering if this is why people are supporting Rodgers.
If so, I am not sure if that applies to this situation. Because mostly anyone who has ever gotten to know Rodgers on a personal-level will say that he is a dick (even if they don't use that word). He even treats his own family like garbage.
So I wonder why he has the number of fans that he does.
Why does he have fans? Well why does any great player have fans? They win games, have fun highlight reels, and are marketable.
His family stuff is his business and should never have been aired publicly. I have family I don't get along with. Should I be treated like a pariah for that?