I'm not going to pile on the writer anymore, I think we've done enough of that. I could, along with most here, offer more insight on our prospects. For me, the rankings should be defined upfront, are we talking about the most likely to play in the NHL or are we talking about pure ceiling of the prospect, because frankly those lists would be very different:
Likely to be NHLer-Pure ceiling
1)Fabbri/Fabbri-if he doesn't get hurt he would have made this team out of camp
2) Barbashev/Barbashev-almost a lock to be a 40pt 3rd line center with on outside chance of top6 role
Then it gets really scrambled
3)Jaskin/Parayako-Both have the measureables to be difference makers, but will they actually make a difference?
4)Schmaltz/Jaskin-Same as above
5)Parayako/Schmaltz-ditto 2.0
6)Rattie/Rattie-Likely a 3rd line winger, maybe a 2nd liner in 5 years-Sharp lite.
7)Lindbohm/Binnington-was signing Bohm praises after camp, bright future
8)Binnington/Lindbohm (Goalies...who knows, could be an all-star or he could become Elliott
, is he only. 3rd pairing Dman?
9)Edmundson/Vanelli
10)Vanelli/deaschaneu(sp?)
Then it gets real messy, so I'm not even going to try, but my biggest problem is that im not really sure which way the author is trying to rank them? Is it the likelihood of them making the NHL a in some fashion or are we talking about what player has the highest ceiling, because those lists would be quite different and the qualifications for their ranking would also need to be a little more consistent throughout. This post (will not call it an article) seems to follow both, and gets lost because of it.