Post-Game Talk: #77 | FLYERS 2 at Stars 3 (OT)| Tue., Mar. 27, 2018, 8:30 pm ET

BackToTheBrierePatch

Nope not today.
Feb 19, 2003
65,845
24,252
Concord, New Hampshire
I am amazed that that info (OT records) is not readily available.

Espn has the SO info. Just did the math on the other 15 OT games for the Flyers.
Really didn’t feel like digging into Pittsburgh’s 3 on 3 ot record. If someone wants to by all means

EDIT: jojo found it. 10-4
So 12-6 for Pittsburgh after 60
10-14 for the Flyers after 60.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
You are what your record says you are.
Flyers are not underachieving, if anything, they're over achieving.

All these statements about how players "should be used" are speculation.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
127,478
164,320
Armored Train
You are what your record says you are.
Flyers are not underachieving, if anything, they're over achieving.

All these statements about how players "should be used" are speculation.


It's absolutely not speculation that choosing to chase top line matchups with players like Flip, MacD, and Hagg is misuse. That's fact.
 

JojoTheWhale

CORN BOY
May 22, 2008
33,322
103,974
You are what your record says you are.
Flyers are not underachieving, if anything, they're over achieving.

This is absurd. When they lost 10 in a row, you were correctly screaming up and down about how they were an average team that just so happened to be on a bad streak.

You don't get to argue the opposite because it fits the preferred narrative now.
 

JXC

#ThisAintXbox #ThisAintMightyDucks #FireHakstol
Dec 28, 2005
21,923
4,898
Espn has the SO info. Just did the math on the other 15 OT games for the Flyers.
Really didn’t feel like digging into Pittsburgh’s 3 on 3 ot record. If someone wants to by all means

EDIT: jojo found it. 10-4
So 12-6 for Pittsburgh after 60
10-14 for the Flyers after 60.
Okay.

I feel like that’s the difference right there then, or one of the differences, anyway.
 

JXC

#ThisAintXbox #ThisAintMightyDucks #FireHakstol
Dec 28, 2005
21,923
4,898
This is absurd. When they lost 10 in a row, you were correctly screaming up and down about how they were an average team that just so happened to be on a bad streak.

You don't get to argue the opposite because it fits the preferred narrative now.
In the long run, he’s right.
 

JXC

#ThisAintXbox #ThisAintMightyDucks #FireHakstol
Dec 28, 2005
21,923
4,898
It's not about Points, it's about how you're playing. Don't take my word for it. Hextall said it.

A coach's job is to maximize every angle he possibly can while building a culture around the team. He's failing miserably at both of those. You don't get credit for being in a bad roster situation when you helped create it and compounded it further.



Pittsburgh is 10-4. They have the most OT Wins in the league.



NHL.com - Stats

Then Goals Against in Overtime is a few columns to the right.
Thanks man.

So the Flyers are within two points of Pittsburgh despite the Pens having an awesome coach and the Flyers coach failing at every aspect of coaching?

No.

The Pens lead the Flyers because they have better top end players for overtime and shootouts.
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
89,438
155,155
Pennsylvania
Team loses - "Hakstol can't be blamed, he has no control over the performance of the players!"

Team wins - "Hakstol's doing a great job!"

:popcorn:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->