Post-Game Talk: #69: Senators 2 at FLYERS 3, Monday, Mar. 11, 2019, 7:00 p.m. ET

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
127,919
165,602
Armored Train
Hakstol:
5x5: CF 51.25, GF/GA 2.66/2.78, SCF/CA 25.0/23.9, Sv% 83.94%, HDCF/CA 11.2/9.8, Sv% 81.72
PP: CF 86.54, GF/GA 4.22/2.11, SCF/CA 48.6/8.5, Sh% 10.11%, HDCF/CA 25.4/4.9, Sh% 14.81
PK: CF 17.48, GF/GA 1.06/9.57, SCF/CA 7.4/45.4, Sv% 75.78%, HDCF/CA 3.9/20.9, Sv% 70.00

Gordon's hot streak (26 games since 1/10/19):
5x5: CF 45.53, GF/GA 2.95/2.61, SCF/CA 24.3/28.8, Sv% 87.33%, HDCF/CA 10.1/11.3, Sv% 85.79
PP: CF 84.05, GF/GA 7.94/0.93, SCF/CA 46.7/6.5, Sh% 13.33%, HDCF/CA 22.9/1.9, Sh% 20.51
PK: CF 11.90, GF/GA 0.54/5.37, SCF/CA 7.0/48.9, Sv% 86.00%, HDCF/CA 2.7/20.4, Sv% 92.31

These numbers are almost unbelievable.

Outside the goalies, and a much improved shooting percentage, the team is playing WORSE under Gordon.
Corsi is worse in every situation. At 5x5 it's dramatically worse.
They allow far more scoring chances, and high danger chances, at 5x5.
On the PP, they're generating fewer scoring and high danger chances, but they're scoring at a much higher rate.
On the PK, they're allowing more scoring chances, and only slightly fewer high danger chances, but the goalies are playing out of their gourds.

The one substantial improvement is they're allowing fewer breakaways and high danger scoring chances against them on the PP.

I wonder why you've begun ignoring raw goal production?

Your stats are failing to take into account that Hakstol lived on the perimeter in the offensive zone while Gordon has them attacking high scoring areas and brings more pressure. Context is important, but you've never cared about it because you're not seeking the truth but rather to support your fake narratives.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
127,919
165,602
Armored Train
Lehtera is being scratched for most of the Phantoms games while Byron Froese plays as a veteran center ahead of him, which just shows how badly Hak overplayed him for 1.5 seasons.

Anyone could see that Lehtera was a guy who should be suiting up only in emergency circumstances. The fact he was used a regular 4th liner who got PP and PK time was absurd.


Yeah but look at Corsi without any context!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
It's not like Lehtera was playing over anyone good.
2017-18: 9:12 at ES, played more than Leier or Goul. Played less than Weal, Weise, Laughton or Read
2018-19: 7:31 at ES, that's less than Varone, Vorobyev, Knight or Weise.
 

Flyrs21

Registered User
Dec 17, 2006
1,260
1,036
TK minutes per game:
Jan: 15:25
Feb: 17:54
March: 16:08
April: 15:33
Oct: 14:46
Nov: 16:44
Jan: 15:00
Feb: 14:34
Mar: 14:24

So he's playing less under Gordon than Hakstol. Hmm.
TK is a talented scorer who might be, along with JVR, our worst defensive forward.
Holy Mackerel..... he was taken off the top line from the islanders game in April and the playoffs for Raffl, hence me saying getting them into the playoffs along with Giroux. You can play 15 minutes a night but top line minutes are different than 3rd line minutes.
 

General Joseph

Registered User
Dec 25, 2017
217
266
Florida Panhandle
I wonder why you've begun ignoring raw goal production?

Your stats are failing to take into account that Hakstol lived on the perimeter in the offensive zone while Gordon has them attacking high scoring areas and brings more pressure. Context is important, but you've never cared about it because you're not seeking the truth but rather to support your fake narratives.
Your point is well taken , but i think with the bad goal tending and serious Defensive woes , Hak figured he had to keep folks up top more to get back on D . Having said that i am glad our D and goal tending seems to be getting with the program .
 

BritainStix

F**k Cutter Gauthier
Oct 20, 2016
6,598
9,660
Has deadhead still not figured out that our goaltenders performances have increased drastically because

A) we arent putting our worst players on the ice constantly
B) we arent giving up breakaway after breakaway
C) Manning is no longer anywhere near this team.

Its almost like Hakstol is the reason for the three above items...
 

BackToTheBrierePatch

Nope not today.
Feb 19, 2003
66,154
24,548
Concord, New Hampshire
Has deadhead still not figured out that our goaltenders performances have increased drastically because

A) we arent putting our worst players on the ice constantly
B) we arent giving up breakaway after breakaway
C) Manning is no longer anywhere near this team.

Its almost like Hakstol is the reason for the three above items...

They had no choice man :sarcasm:
 

Flyerfan4life

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
34,781
21,168
Richmond BC, Canada
I wonder why you've begun ignoring raw goal production?

Your stats are failing to take into account that Hakstol lived on the perimeter in the offensive zone while Gordon has them attacking high scoring areas and brings more pressure. Context is important, but you've never cared about it because you're not seeking the truth but rather to support your fake narratives.

"sit down... your fake news"...
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,628
74,686
Philadelphia, Pa
Your point is well taken , but i think with the bad goal tending and serious Defensive woes , Hak figured he had to keep folks up top more to get back on D . Having said that i am glad our D and goal tending seems to be getting with the program .

Hawks goaltending woes were his own doing. Elliott had great 5v5 numbers before he got hurt, similar to what he has now.

The difference is Hak had the team playing such poor defence with poor players on the ice, that it didnt matter.
 

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Sponsor
Jun 19, 2018
31,873
69,776
Dude, c'mon. Really? This is you, being serious, for real now? What side of the bed did you get out of? Do you even sleep in a bed? Such a tired, tired response.

Patrick has no beard. Beard = facial hair. Voracek > Patrick. Nuff said!

All that other stuff, I don't disagree with it, but am unwilling to say you are correct. Neither confirm, nor deny.
Listen here bub.

Facial hair =/= the colloquial "hair" which implies the hair on the head

Hair: NP > Jake
Facial hair: Jake > NP

These are the facts of the case and they cannot be disputed.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
Has deadhead still not figured out that our goaltenders performances have increased drastically because

A) we arent putting our worst players on the ice constantly
B) we arent giving up breakaway after breakaway
C) Manning is no longer anywhere near this team.

Its almost like Hakstol is the reason for the three above items...

If that was true, it would be reflected in a lower rate of scoring chances and high danger scoring chances against.
The numbers don't show that.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
127,919
165,602
Armored Train
Your point is well taken , but i think with the bad goal tending and serious Defensive woes , Hak figured he had to keep folks up top more to get back on D . Having said that i am glad our D and goal tending seems to be getting with the program .

Hak had them playing like that even when the goalies were giving him good performances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,619
16,426
Do people honestly believe the reason Cal Pickard, Petr Mrazek, Michal Neuvirth, & Alex Lyon couldn’t stop beach balls the last two seasons was because of Hakstol’s system?

Come on. Not only is that ludicrous from a simple eye test, it implies that Hakstol significantly changed his system for the worse after his first season, when Mason & Neuvirth were healthy and sharp & the team got excellent goaltending.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad