Beef Invictus
Revolutionary Positivity
Hakstol:
5x5: CF 51.25, GF/GA 2.66/2.78, SCF/CA 25.0/23.9, Sv% 83.94%, HDCF/CA 11.2/9.8, Sv% 81.72
PP: CF 86.54, GF/GA 4.22/2.11, SCF/CA 48.6/8.5, Sh% 10.11%, HDCF/CA 25.4/4.9, Sh% 14.81
PK: CF 17.48, GF/GA 1.06/9.57, SCF/CA 7.4/45.4, Sv% 75.78%, HDCF/CA 3.9/20.9, Sv% 70.00
Gordon's hot streak (26 games since 1/10/19):
5x5: CF 45.53, GF/GA 2.95/2.61, SCF/CA 24.3/28.8, Sv% 87.33%, HDCF/CA 10.1/11.3, Sv% 85.79
PP: CF 84.05, GF/GA 7.94/0.93, SCF/CA 46.7/6.5, Sh% 13.33%, HDCF/CA 22.9/1.9, Sh% 20.51
PK: CF 11.90, GF/GA 0.54/5.37, SCF/CA 7.0/48.9, Sv% 86.00%, HDCF/CA 2.7/20.4, Sv% 92.31
These numbers are almost unbelievable.
Outside the goalies, and a much improved shooting percentage, the team is playing WORSE under Gordon.
Corsi is worse in every situation. At 5x5 it's dramatically worse.
They allow far more scoring chances, and high danger chances, at 5x5.
On the PP, they're generating fewer scoring and high danger chances, but they're scoring at a much higher rate.
On the PK, they're allowing more scoring chances, and only slightly fewer high danger chances, but the goalies are playing out of their gourds.
The one substantial improvement is they're allowing fewer breakaways and high danger scoring chances against them on the PP.
I wonder why you've begun ignoring raw goal production?
Your stats are failing to take into account that Hakstol lived on the perimeter in the offensive zone while Gordon has them attacking high scoring areas and brings more pressure. Context is important, but you've never cared about it because you're not seeking the truth but rather to support your fake narratives.