Discussion in 'Dallas Stars' started by Smelling Salt, Mar 7, 2019.
Cogs is back, Fakker doubtful
Who wants a pennant?
That's what sucks about not being in Dallas anymore. Miss getting all that memorabilia
Missing faksa is a huge loss . Especially against the avs . He is a major reason we are still in a playoff spot . hope this isn’t like everyone else’s injury’s and drags out longer than expected .
Bish will lead us to glory!
Can you imagine if the Rags had managed to put both Foxy and Bish out via dirty hits on the same night? We would be losing for Hughes.
Just win boys!
Massive 4 point game that the Stars need. Either we’re 3 games ahead of the Avs (5 pts), or just one game.
Happy to see Hintz getting played more in top 6 role
Let's go boys, need the two pts
Not in love with that Spezza line
That's the "none of these players will be here next season" line
Janmark is likely here . Spezza will either be retired or here as well. I don't believe he wants to move again.
Janmark is getting qualified and likely signed to another 1 year prove me deal unless a really good trade randomly comes along. There's no reason not to qualify Janmark . Absolutely none. He's having a down year and costing himself a ton of money but still doing more good than bad.
I wouldn’t mind spezza back on a cheap deal . He is still useful as a 3rd , 4th Line , pp guy . If we add a top 6 fwd spezza would be good for the 2nd unit IMO.
On one hand, you like to keep quality people like JS on the team. On the other, he holds back youth, will be even slower, and has known ever since he signed his deal that he wasn't going to be resigned, unless, perhaps, to front office.
Agree, Janmark should stay. Will rebound next year to 15-20 goals expected of him.
If he's in a 12th/13th forward type of role where he gets scratched somewhat regularly i wouldn't mind having Spezza back. He can give the team some offensive spark in limited minutes and help a a 2nd powerplay unit with young players with his still very good passing skills. Now the question is does he accept that type of role ?
Missed scoring chances - Passes to no one - Dumb penalties
I could see them trying to trade Janmark again, but they might view him as a "bounce back" player and keep him. Hopefully they trade him cause I don't want Nill using him as an excuse for not signing or acquiring another top 6 forward just because Janmark had a down year.
I’d be down for a Janmark/Spezza/Gurianov fourth line!
Trade him for what exactly after a down season ? Thats stupid . Also re-signing Janmark doesn't block anything. He's not going to be expensive. Thats a made up dumb argument.
I could see if we had forwards that were doing better than him but he’s still better than any of our younger players .
Separate names with a comma.