Discussion in 'Dallas Stars' started by Smelling Salt, Feb 25, 2020.
What are they reviewing? They are going to see it wasnt even high stick lmfao
Like i said. Thats roughing.
Interesting I didnt know they could review that
How is that not a penalty shot?
Should have been a penalty shot for Roope.
Thats way more of a penalty shot than what Janny got against the Hawks
Lmao clear as it gets for a PS
What are the refs looking at now?
That’s gotta be a penalty shot . That’s as blatant as can be .
Why are the refs reviewing everything? Is this new?
It could also still be a goal aparently . Unlikely but thats the review
That should be a goal .
Oh man, I think that's going to be a goal.
Nah I dont think that's a goal
Also Carolina should challenge it if it is for goalie interference. Risky but it looks like his foot contacts the goalie
Yea lost track of the puck on that one. That should probably count.
Too bad . I think that should be a goal .
Meh I think it's the right call. Goalie interference anyways too
Went to change a very poopy diaper and I missed some other shit it seems
2nd unit deserves more time
So it’s not a goal because the net came off? If the puck goes into the middle of the net, why does that matter? Also, the net came off because Hintz fell because he was hooked. I don’t know what all the rules are but something doesn’t make sense.
Miro was too casual.. then Radulov just tosses it into the middle of the ice.
Pavelski doesn't understand the situation and throws a soft pass to the middle of the ice and then Radulov with some shit clear.
Everybody but Esa was way up the ice there.
We are back to our sloppy casual play on the puck
Separate names with a comma.