nturn06
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2017
- 3,638
- 2,913
I’m not sure if you understand what positive value is. Stolarz is an asset teams would want. He does not have negative value. So Talbot going one for one for him means Talbot had positive value.
They did extend the wrong goalie. Talbot was once a very good goalie, and has played better again of late. Koskinen has never been good. I can see the logic of not signing either. I can see the logic of signing Talbot. I can’t see why we’d sign Koskinen
Yes, and at the same time Lucic was a 50 points player, and he is playing better as of late...