Split a guy's face open? No high stick. Play on, boys. Awful.
I'm not one of the guys who thinks we get ****ed by refs, I just think the officiating is atrocious all around the league.
Split a guy's face open? No high stick. Play on, boys. Awful.
I'm not one of the guys who thinks we get ****ed by refs, I just think the officiating is atrocious all around the league.
Rumor is split ends.What the heck is wrong with the Tin Man (Letang) now?
It was a follow-through on an attempt at the puck. No penalty in that situation.
It was a follow-through on an attempt at the puck. No penalty in that situation.
What the heck is wrong with the Tin Man (Letang) now?
What the heck is wrong with the Tin Man (Letang) now?
Rumor is split ends.
If you're in the act of shooting or passing, it's not supposed to be a penalty.not sure if you're serious or not...
i thought it didn't matter if it was a follow-through. i've seen lesser high sticks in that fashion draw a minor.
It was a follow-through on an attempt at the puck. No penalty in that situation.
Tanner glass played a good game... he also had more even strength ice time than Sidney Crosby.
Yeah, I couldn't tell if he actually hit the puck or not. But I'm assuming that's why neither ref called.The "follow-through" exception only applies when you're in the act of shooting. Whacking away along the boards doesn't.