Thank you. But before this season, he did have realistic top pairing upside, right?
It has nothing to do with $70k and everything to do with quickly turning it into $700k.Top level NCAA hockey is also a great development league. Add in going for the unheard of 3 peat and another year of university against that I don't think a year with the Moose at $70,000 holds much appeal. So agreed the compensation for ELC players in the A is grossly inappropriate for the value they bring.
That could be a part of it. His family probably ensures he's well taken care of at school. And the school itself -- or at least the athletic department -- probably smooths some bumps. Throw in some hot coeds and another year at school doesn't seem so bad compared to the AHL.
Or you want your kid to wait and be a free agent so he can play in the USA where he's from
Being a pessimist, I'm inclined to agree. All this talk of education being important to him and his family is perhaps their way of foreshadowing what's to come. He'll finish his degree and head for greener pastures. I would wager 100 quatloos on this happening.
I think Mort this is an old way for thinking for many players. Increasingly it appears that NCAA players (mostly Americans) and Europeans (Euro leagues) see alternative paths to the NHL as better fits. When the team that owns their rights see them as ready to make the jump to the NHL they will go, but until then they prefer the other advantages of playing in either the NCAA and getting a degree or playing at home in Europe and earning more money as preferable to grinding it out in the A for a relatively low wage.I can't help but be disappointed by this decision.
- The AHL may not be a lot better development league, but it is a better development league.
- Signed now would eliminate any possibility of him going the UFA route
- He would have made the Moose better
- I had some hope of him being in the NHL before the season ended
I think Mort this is an old way for thinking for many players. Increasingly it appears that NCAA players (mostly Americans) and Europeans (Euro leagues) see alternative paths to the NHL as better fits. When the team that owns their rights see them as ready to make the jump to the NHL they will go, but until then they prefer the other advantages of playing in either the NCAA and getting a degree or playing at home in Europe and earning more money as preferable to grinding it out in the A for a relatively low wage.
Anyone else think that Poolman played hardball in the same way? Agreed to sign if he could avoid the Moose for most of his first pro season. If word got out that it worked for him then we could expect the same from other kids.
It is not just Jets prospects it is pretty much universal for all prospects playing in the NCAA. The vast majority have no desire to play in the AHL. Most will sign with their NHL team if they believe there is a reasonable assumption that they will stay at the NHL level. I don't think teams promise they will stay in the NHL, but rather say we will give you an opportunity to play and you have to show us what you can do.Anyone else think that Poolman played hardball in the same way? Agreed to sign if he could avoid the Moose for most of his first pro season. If word got out that it worked for him then we could expect the same from other kids.
I think education is great. He should finish his degree... during the summer.I don’t think we have to worry yet. Returning to school, I think, is a personal choice. I’m currently in post-secondary, and I’m fairly certain that even if I were an NHL prospect I would try to continue with my degree as long as possible. School might truly be important to him, it is to a lot of people. I don’t think he’s gone yet.
And if he was playing on the Jets that is likely what he would do. If not it looks like his choice is the Bulldogs over the Moose while getting another full of school under his belt.I think education is great. He should finish his degree... during the summer.
The signing bonus isn't what it used to be. Signing a max level entry contract nets you that 277,500 signing bonus up front plus your salary. I don't know if nowadays with most of these kids that is enough to get me to leave college. A lot of these guys come from wealthier families, not like the old days when you had the sons of farmers and miners.
The signing bonus is 92500 when you sign and 92500 in each of the following two years . In the NHL max is 92500 signing bonus and 832500 salary . it is the same now as it was in 2011 when they signed the new CBA . Players salary has doubled in that time but the rookie ELC have not increased one bit . And 70000 salary in AHL on ELC's is basically a joke and ain't helping convincing them either .The signing bonus isn't what it used to be. Signing a max level entry contract nets you that 277,500 signing bonus up front plus your salary. I don't know if nowadays with most of these kids that is enough to get me to leave college. A lot of these guys come from wealthier families, not like the old days when you had the sons of farmers and miners.
I've gone off a few times on the low ELC salary in the AHL and agree it is way too low to make many players give up on the NCAA if they don't think they will take a direct step to the NHL.The signing bonus is 92500 when you sign and 92500 in each of the following two years . In the NHL max is 92500 signing bonus and 832500 salary . it is the same now as it was in 2011 when they signed the new CBA . Players salary has doubled in that time but the rookie ELC have not increased one bit . And 70000 salary in AHL on ELC's is basically a joke and ain't helping convincing them either .