The Vasili Jerry
Serenity now!
Last edited:
I'm not sure what you mean here. Do you mean that PP production is a more reliable predictor of even strength production than even strength production is? I'd say that's ... counter-intuitive.
I mean 5on5 production is flukey for Dmen. PP assists is the most sustainable form of proudction. There for if you have a Dman with a load of 5on5 goals expect those numbers to regress to the mean.
I'm not a stats guy, but this seems odd to me. First of all, I was referring to points, not goals, but even if we take goals alone, are you saying that there aren't some defencemen who consistently score more even-strength goals that others, and some less?
If I were looking at a defenceman's stats over the course of a junior career, and he consistently put up points at even strength, I'd be inclined to put more weight on that than I would power-play points. You're saying I'd be wrong to do so, correct?
Im not 100% sure. I know it seems counterintuitive, it does to me as well.
I cant find my source for this either.
Maybe it came to me in a dream.
The jist of it was that Dmen are at the mercy of luck, even more so than forwards, when it comes to being in one of the 2 assists for a goal and shooting% for the average Dman is generally far lower than that of the average forward.
On the PP this isnt quite so extreme. All shooting% is obviously higher and if a Dman is concistently getting assists there it means the PP is ran through him. Also a coach has deemed him worthy of the PP time.
But again, this became more an anecdote and less data driven since I cant find where I read this.
@Melvin Maybe you can halp?
But how much stalk can you put into PP assist production though? Realistically there are 31 teams in the NHL and most teams will have 1-2 Dmen who gets loads of PP time. Take Alex Edler. He's basically the Canucks' go to Dman on the PP the past 2 years and last season he was top 30 and this year he's top 20 in PP points among Dmen. But ya Edler's offensive production is top 50 among Dmen.
That doesn't sound right...Maybe it works for NHL players as well... Not 100% sure.
But Im talking prospects here. If you have a D man scoring a ton of even strength points (especially goals or 2nd assists) that is a bit of a red flag that his production is likely the product of luck & line mates rather than his own individual play driving the offense.
Maybe it works for NHL players as well... Not 100% sure.
But Im talking prospects here. If you have a D man scoring a ton of even strength points (especially goals or 2nd assists) that is a bit of a red flag that his production is likely the product of luck & line mates rather than his own individual play driving the offense.
That doesn't sound right...
I'm with Literally. That doesn't sound right at all.
If you aren't basing it on intuition, may I ask what you are basing it on?Like I said, it is not intuitive.
But how much stalk can you put into PP assist production though?
Apparently Woo was playing through an injury down the stretch in the WHL....makes his overall season even more impressive. But he's had a lot of injuries playing junior hockey, and given how so many d-men are regularly felled in Utica, you have to wonder how he'll fare facing guys a a lot bigger than he is.....might have to tone down his physical play a bit.
If you aren't basing it on intuition, may I ask what you are basing it on?
harman dayal said:In summation, here are the tools and factors I take into account when analyzing a defencemen’s offensive profile.
- Primary Points
- Expected Primary Points Per Hour
- Primary Shot Contributions
- Defensive zone exits
- Offensive zone entries
- SCB %(on-ice shot contribution percentage)
- Individual Point %(Percentage of on-ice goals a player gets points on)
- Deployment(Teammate and competition quality, zone starts, special teams opportunities)
I think he means following around someone obssesivelyAre we talking celery or corn?
I dont think its impressive in the sense hes not exceeding expectations that a d+1 prospect should have. Hes trending as he should.
However, I think its very impressive relative to the expectations going into this season. Woo is keeping up with offensive defenseman in terms of raw production. You look at the first few pages of this thread, people were absolutely trashing the pick. He exceeded my expectations I thought he was going to get 0.5-0.75ppg. Unlike some of the other defenseman (ex. Addison) producing similarly to him, woo doesn't have big problems on the defensive end. I think it's a big win overall so far.
Both they and he knew what was bothering him after his playoffs ended. He was hurt. He couldn't even get through a non-contact practice the first day in Utica and was released after watching the first game they played when he was here.
He should have never been sent here in the first pace. He should have been resting up, recovering from his injury, and then get to work on preparation for next season.
I regret that I have but only one like to give for this post.This kinda crap happens way too frequently with this org.
It's a stereotype that hockey players are tough and gotta play through injuries. Battling through injuries puts players on a pedestal.Both they and he knew what was bothering him after his playoffs ended. He was hurt. He couldn't even get through a non-contact practice the first day in Utica and was released after watching the first game they played when he was here.
He should have never been sent here in the first pace. He should have been resting up, recovering from his injury, and then get to work on preparation for next season.