It's pretty obvious it was sarcasm. Every semi-regular fan from that era and even after would at least know of Hull & Oates, let alone a Blues fan.
It's pretty obvious it was sarcasm. Every semi-regular fan from that era and even after would at least know of Hull & Oates, let alone a Blues fan.
Yeah, we had that same problem with Brett Hullto be fair Oates never really jelled with anyone here ........
Not to mention Gary Unger for Red BerensonYou "owe us" for HOF'er Adam Oates for 1 yr. of Bernie Federko still. That was one of the worst trades of all-time. Old Federko retired, while Oates had 3 great seasons for the Blues, then traded for Craig Janney & Stephan Quintal. Janney later turned into Petr Nedved, while Quintal was packaged w/Nelson Emerson later for Doug Lidster and Esa Tikkanen. Wings probably win 2+ more cups w/Oates.
Neither is Athanasiou.
Yeah, we had that same problem with Brett Hull
So what about DLR and a second? fabbri and a second seems more than fairIf you look at numbers between Zucker and AA over the last couple 2ish seasons they are actually similar. Zuckee is a better player on a cost controller deal but AA is still worth a late first as he will be RFA this summer. A backup goalie not so much.
If St.Louis wants AA we will deal directly with them as we have already this season.
I think it’s a good offer. Once again, too many people choose not to read the initial post and instead want to react in anger. The initial poster did not suggest Georgiyev is with a first, considering the Rangers are giving up a 3rd. It’s a 2nd+, which is around his value.
Why should anybody pay for a backup goalie 2nd+ at the trade deadline? Even more so, if the Rangers get their hand forced, if they don't want to sent Shesterkin or Lundqvist to the AHL next season? Georgiev with a reasonable contract could be picked up from the waivers without any compensation, if they send him to the AHL.I think it’s a good offer. Once again, too many people choose not to read the initial post and instead want to react in anger. The initial poster did not suggest Georgiyev is with a first, considering the Rangers are giving up a 3rd. It’s a 2nd+, which is around his value.
Why should anybody pay for a backup goalie 2nd+ at the trade deadline? Even more so, if the Rangers get their hand forced, if they don't want to sent Shesterkin or Lundqvist to the AHL next season? Georgiev with a reasonable contract could be picked up from the waivers without any compensation, if they send him to the AHL.
If Sakic wants to sign him, he talks to Georgiev regarding an offer sheet in the summer and offers the 2nd from WAS for his RFA rights. If NY balks just ask Georgiev instead to sign a 2.1m/1yr offer sheet, which result in a 3rd and see, if NY wants to match this. I don't see the Rangers leverage with Georgiev with the lack of cap and roster space.
I'll just say this doesn't work cap wise and move on.
If you look at numbers between Zucker and AA over the last couple 2ish seasons they are actually similar. Zuckee is a better player on a cost controller deal but AA is still worth a late first as he will be RFA this summer. A backup goalie not so much.
If St.Louis wants AA we will deal directly with them as we have already this season.
If you insist on a Bracco level prospect, most teams could spare such a player in a trade.Because the Rangers don't have to send anyone to any league. Nothing is forced. We have the cap space for three goalies. Shestyorkin has forced the hand of the coach, and is now the starter.
Its pretty simple. If needed, Georgiev and Lundqvist simply won't play very much. Is Georgiyev's value going to go down so much playing 20 games a season compared to 30?
And I don't see why his value wouldn't be a 2nd+. The template from Leafs fans was 2nd+Bracco, so a 2nd+B level prospect. If teams don't want to offer up at least that, we don't need to trade him.
Tarasenko is returning soonish, which makes the deal not possible. As long as Tarasenko returns during the season, then we won't be cap compliant.Everything works because Tarasenko is on LTIR.
Tarasenko is returning soonish, which makes the deal not possible. As long as Tarasenko returns during the season, then we won't be cap compliant.
After seeing what Zucker pulled down yesterday I have a hard time believing a serious contender isn’t willing to part with a 1st for AA.
If you insist on a Bracco level prospect, most teams could spare such a player in a trade.
But if you expect Detroit to offer their own 2nd (#32) or a 1st from STL, which they acquire in this proposal, you are living in a dream world. Detroit is not playing for the POs, they play for Lafreniere. They have Zero motivation to improve their goaltending situation before or at the trade deadline. In the summer Georgiev is a RFA and the Rangers have two other goalies on the NHL roster. Fast is UFA, Strome, Lemieux and ADA are all RFA. You will have around 17m in cap space. Hard to believe the Rangers would prioritize their 3rd string goalie over retaining any of these players. I am pretty sure Yzerman would bet on Georgiev being available much cheaper in the summer. Good luck finding a trade partner, which overpays with those circumstances.
Help yourself.Detroit has Washington's second rounder.
You still haven't answered why he would be much cheaper at any point.
He'll play tomorrow, but maybe this means he'll finally start to get a run of games in a row. Georgiyev and Lundqvist have both been mediocre the last few months.
Neither is Athanasiou.