This is where I'm at. I'm still leaning Byram just because I see him and Turcotte as essentially equal as BPA, and when two are equal I start finding "tiebreakers". Even a tiebreaker can be debated, of course, but I just lean toward the guy who can be a franchise d-man and that takes nothing away from Turcotte. He can be a franchise C in his own right, and we know this team could use a young, high-end C in its arsenal going forward.
If we knew Toews could be this Toews for five more years, I'm less concerned with the C position, especially with the emergence of Strome. But no one can know that.
It's not an easy decision, but it's a great one to have.