Sky04
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2009
- 29,025
- 18,035
someone should have put clayton keller into the second row
That would take effort... something this team hasn't shown in months
someone should have put clayton keller into the second row
What we're seeing now, and what we saw in January aren't that comparable. This stretch has been much worse.
Therrien ate Cooper's lunch...twice. And I'd hesitate to say the Lightning really adjusted well to what the Red Wings were doing in 2015 seeing as how the Red Wings were much better in possession that game and the Lightning scored their only real goal off a right point shot from Braydon Coburn of all people. Game 7 was, at best, dead even; at worst, the Red Wings were unlucky that night.
But that doesn't even really matter, because Babcock coaches a much better team now anyway. That Detroit team should've never taken the Lightning to seven games. The talent disparity was apparent even then and Babcock still took the Wings as far as he could.
My point isn't about the actual record. It's about what I'm seeing in their play. But I have a knowledge only acquired by playing at a high level so you may not understand.AT one point they were 11-10 after Jan 1st. That was a mid-season whatchamacallit. Then it was we're saving our energy. Then it was bad puck luck. Then it was we aren't interested. Then it was the Gibbous Moon. Then it was the Easter bunny was kidnapped.
Excuse city.
Honest opinions. % chance TB beats Toronto or NJ round 1. % chance the Lightning beat Boston round two if that is indeed the matchup?
Better than the chance that you're actually a Lightning fan.Honest opinions. % chance TB beats Toronto or NJ round 1. % chance the Lightning beat Boston round two if that is indeed the matchup?
Tell me, what did Therrien do so masterfully in 2015? I'm not even going to count 2014, that was a mess of a debut.
Babcock kept it as tight as he could, but even he would be the first to tell you it's easier to destroy than create. His stacked Team Canada teams have even been frustrated by inferior opponents who employ defensive hockey. That's the nature of the sport. We outlasted them, made adjustments to their neutral zone tactics and "subtle interference".
Honest opinions. % chance TB beats Toronto or NJ round 1. % chance the Lightning beat Boston round two if that is indeed the matchup?
Habs outshot the Lightning in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th games. Lightning scored 2, 2, (?), and 1 goals in those games (I don't know how many they scored in Game 4 but that was a blowout anyway and wasn't particularly important. They had difficulty throughout that series at getting sustained zone time or quality scoring chances. Game 6 was their best performance all-around, and if you want to give some credit to Cooper for that one I'm not going to take that away from you, but there's a couple of truths to that series in that the Lightning were fortunate to be up 3-0 in the first place, and that they very nearly pissed that 3-0 series lead away.
It was even more frustrating seeing as how the Lightning had gone 5-0 against Montreal in the regular season and, a 1-0 OT game in Montreal aside, had shown no difficulty in generating offense against them throughout the season. Yada yada "regular season != playoffs", I'm well aware, but the difference between how they looked in the previous five games and how they looked in the first five playoff games was startling. They had gone from handling Montreal easily to being handled by Montreal and getting bailed out by the Habs continually hitting the post or crossbar. Seriously, Montreal hit iron 12 times or so in that series; I remember keeping count on it. The Lightning were really, really fortunate to come out on top in that series.
Habs outshot the Lightning in the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th games. Lightning scored 2, 2, (?), and 1 goals in those games (I don't know how many they scored in Game 4 but that was a blowout anyway and wasn't particularly important. They had difficulty throughout that series at getting sustained zone time or quality scoring chances. Game 6 was their best performance all-around, and if you want to give some credit to Cooper for that one I'm not going to take that away from you, but there's a couple of truths to that series in that the Lightning were fortunate to be up 3-0 in the first place, and that they very nearly pissed that 3-0 series lead away.
It was even more frustrating seeing as how the Lightning had gone 5-0 against Montreal in the regular season and, a 1-0 OT game in Montreal aside, had shown no difficulty in generating offense against them throughout the season. Yada yada "regular season != playoffs", I'm well aware, but the difference between how they looked in the previous five games and how they looked in the first five playoff games was startling. They had gone from handling Montreal easily to being handled by Montreal and getting bailed out by the Habs continually hitting the post or crossbar. Seriously, Montreal hit iron 12 times or so in that series; I remember keeping count on it. The Lightning were really, really fortunate to come out on top in that series.
The odds of beating New Jersey are 85-90%. I honestly believe that.
Toronto? 35-40%.
Boston? 5-10%.
We all will be taking lumps. I prefer to eat crow though. I'll eat a whole damn buffet.Anyways, it's clear that this will be a debate within the fanbase for the rest of the season. I'll take my lumps if we bow out of the first round, but I'm not freaking out here.
I'm a Lightning fan, but, unlike you, one who actually knows a thing or two about percentages and statistics from vigorous statistics courses at a high level. Unless something changes dramatically, this team will be playing golf in May. I'm not wishing for it, but, as has been noted here many times, it's not a switch you turn on and off. So, enjoy the big win tonight against a generationally bad defense, it doesn't mean a damn thing. What does mean something is that our PK can't stop an ECHL PP now.
It goes both ways. We looked like trash heading into the 2016 playoffs, and then we made Detroit look like a bunch of chumps. Wings played us better in the regular season then that playoff.
They did? That Red Wings team was awful. They beat the Lightning twice in Detroit very early in the season and the Lightning won the two games in Tampa, both of which were played after the road games and one of them was late in the season. It's entirely possibly my memory is failing me but the way you describe the lead-up to that first round series doesn't sound like how I remember it at all.
In any case, if we're going to compare regular season matchups between the '15 Habs and '16 Wings, then the big difference is that the Lightning and Habs played three times in March of that season, when the season was at its height. Lightning and Wings played once in March and, I think, only once in the entire 2016 part of the season. It's really not a straight comparison.
No team has 90% chance of beating us. How do you even write that out and not feel dumb. Trying to put a number on it is dumb in the first place, but only a 10% chance? It's like people don't even pay attention to some of the issues Boston has, they're not a dynasty in the making over there. They have a really good shot at beating us if we meet, but get real with that number.
The mood in this place going into the 2016 playoffs was similar to what it is now. "We're gonna get rolled, we have no chace" blah blah blah.
Fact is we could win, or we could lose. What's happening at this part of the season isn't a big indicator if you want to base it on the past.