HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
74,937
44,629
No. You want to trade away Caufield ?
We have five guys in our top six if you include Roy. We are jammed to the gills on LD.

Buium doesn’t make sense unless we trade away Guhle/Hutson. Drafting Buium to play on the third pairing doesn’t make sense. Do you want Guehle to permanently be in the right side? That doesn’t make sense either.

Yes, I’d take Eiserman (an unpopular take here) but I’m very happy with Lidstrom,Demidov, Catton…. I’ll be happy with any of those players. All of them will bring a dimension we need.
 
Last edited:

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
88,806
54,987
Citizen of the world
We have five guys in our top six if you include Roy. We are jammed to the gills on LD.

Buium doesn’t make sense unless we trade away Guhle/Hutson. Drafting Buium to play on the third pairing doesn’t make sense. Do you want Guehle to permanently be in the right side? It doesn’t make sense.

Yes, I’d take Eiserman (an unpopular take here) but I’m very happy with Lidstrom,Demidov, Catton…. I’ll be happy with any of those players. All of them will bring a dimension we need.
We have two potential guys in the top 4 at LD. Displacing one of those to the RD, trading him or the possibility of Hutson just not making it makes it so that picking Buium isn't some sort of nail in the coffin, not any more than picking Eiserman when we have Caufield, at least. There's no way Buium would play on the third pair, he'd be a staple on the first pair and he'd push Guhle to the 2nd pair, a luxury. Hutson could be traded away or used as a PP specialist/3 on 3 specialist while playing his regular 3rd pair shift.

It's not ideal, but the fact you defend picking Eiserman but are categorical on Buium is illogical.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
52,723
65,851
We have two potential guys in the top 4 at LD. Displacing one of those to the RD, trading him or the possibility of Hutson just not making it makes it so that picking Buium isn't some sort of nail in the coffin, not any more than picking Eiserman when we have Caufield, at least. There's no way Buium would play on the third pair, he'd be a staple on the first pair and he'd push Guhle to the 2nd pair, a luxury. Hutson could be traded away or used as a PP specialist/3 on 3 specialist while playing his regular 3rd pair shift.

It's not ideal, but the fact you defend picking Eiserman but are categorical on Buium is illogical.
I also think Guhle's gotten better at playing the right side. A lot of dmen are starting to play both. Look at Heiskanen for instance.

Buium-Guhle
Hutson-Reinbacher
Xhekaj/Struble-Mailloux
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deam78

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
88,806
54,987
Citizen of the world
I also think Guhle's gotten better at playing the right side. A lot of dmen are starting to play both. Look at Heiskanen for instance.

Buium-Guhle
Hutson-Reinbacher
Xhekaj/Struble-Mailloux
Heiskanen isn't a very good example as he doesn't look very good on the right IMO, at least not to the extent of his talent.

I'd want Guhle on the left side ultimately, team composition can be modified when you have the pieces, passing a clearly superior player (If he is) because we have two other partially good players at home is infuriatingly stupid.

How far does it extend? If the Habs win the lottery, do we trade back because the Habs have Suzuki and Dach ? Like come on.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
20,533
26,588
How far does it extend? If the Habs win the lottery, do we trade back because the Habs have Suzuki and Dach ? Like come on.

Celebrini is on a tier of its own. He's far better than the rest. That's not the case with Buium. At 5, he will not be far better than the forwards that will he available. Buium wasn't even ranked top 12 in Bob's mid season ranking.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
88,806
54,987
Citizen of the world
Celebrini is on a tier of its own. He's far better than the rest. That's not the case with Buium. At 5, he will not be far better than the forwards that will he available. Buium wasn't even ranked top 12 in Bob's mid season ranking.
And Suzuki and Dach are both much better than Guhle and Hutson and Xhekaj. Thus, not a logical process.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
74,937
44,629
We have two potential guys in the top 4 at LD. Displacing one of those to the RD, trading him or the possibility of Hutson just not making it makes it so that picking Buium isn't some sort of nail in the coffin, not any more than picking Eiserman when we have Caufield, at least. There's no way Buium would play on the third pair, he'd be a staple on the first pair and he'd push Guhle to the 2nd pair, a luxury. Hutson could be traded away or used as a PP specialist/3 on 3 specialist while playing his regular 3rd pair shift.

It's not ideal, but the fact you defend picking Eiserman but are categorical on Buium is illogical.
Forget Eiserman. It’s not a hill I’d die on and we’re not drafting him. Lidstrom? Great. Demidov? Great. Catton? Great.

Get a forward.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
74,937
44,629
Heiskanen isn't a very good example as he doesn't look very good on the right IMO, at least not to the extent of his talent.

I'd want Guhle on the left side ultimately, team composition can be modified when you have the pieces, passing a clearly superior player (If he is) because we have two other partially good players at home is infuriatingly stupid.

How far does it extend? If the Habs win the lottery, do we trade back because the Habs have Suzuki and Dach ? Like come on.
If you want Guhle here on the left side… we’ve already got Hutson. Matheson is already going to have to be dealt and we’ve got tons of other players. Plus we need a top six forward.

If Buium were a RD I’d be all in but that’s not the case. It just doesn’t make any sense unless you start trading guys off and then you’re setting the rebuild back further.

We clearly need a forward and there’s good talent available. Dont complicate things. Draft the forward and move on.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
74,937
44,629
Lindstrom, for sure. What about Iginla?
Iginla? Sure. I’m good with any of those guys. I’ll defer to the scouts, they’ve done a great job so far.

All these players will bring an element we don’t have. I love the idea of Lidstrom because we’d be a big strong club. Demidov would bring sizzle up from that we haven’t seen since Mats Naslund. It’s all good.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad