405Entrance
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2020
- 852
- 594
Who are you fellas feeling we should get for our 2nd rounder ? I’m feeling really confident that madden and co can get a steal. It helps that this year they kinda got screwed by rona
I have my fingers crossed that Olausson falls a bitWho are you fellas feeling we should get for our 2nd rounder ? I’m feeling really confident that madden and co can get a steal. It helps that this year they kinda got screwed by rona
Who are you fellas feeling we should get for our 2nd rounder ? I’m feeling really confident that madden and co can get a steal. It helps that this year they kinda got screwed by rona
He is so good that he is the only member of his team wearing a white helmet so that the other team can spot him and defend him better when ever he is on the ice
Some players have that ability to make the game look like it's in slow motion
Who are you fellas feeling we should get for our 2nd rounder ? I’m feeling really confident that madden and co can get a steal. It helps that this year they kinda got screwed by rona
Why are you confident? They passed on a bunch of good players for Brayden Tracey. Everyone had Hoglander rated higher and that seems like a big miss to this pointWho are you fellas feeling we should get for our 2nd rounder ? I’m feeling really confident that madden and co can get a steal. It helps that this year they kinda got screwed by rona
Its looking like the Badini over Batherson again.Why are you confident? They passed on a bunch of good players for Brayden Tracey. Everyone had Hoglander rated higher and that seems like a big miss to this point
It'll be really nice to have Hughes. If he can be Quinn 2.0I've moved Clarke down a little on my list.
Beniers
Power
Eklund
Hughes
Clarke
Guenther
Why are we confident in one of the best drafting teams in the last decade, you ask?Why are you confident? They passed on a bunch of good players for Brayden Tracey. Everyone had Hoglander rated higher and that seems like a big miss to this point
I'd be surprised if the Ducks don't have Power at #1, especially after hearing McKenzie say 10/10 scouts have him there.
I have no issue with Power as I think he at the very least grows into a Parayko level defender. Still prefer Beniers though, just think they need his skillset more.
Agreed completelyI'd be surprised if the Ducks don't have Power at #1, especially after hearing McKenzie say 10/10 scouts have him there.
I have no issue with Power as I think he at the very least grows into a Parayko level defender. Still prefer Beniers though, just think they need his skillset more.
I bet Murray does a little dance on the way to announce the Ducks pick Power, no way he passes on Power.I don’t think management will pass up an opportunity to secure what they may see as a future 1st pairing on D - Power/Drysdale. I think if he’s available they take him.
It does seem like a match made in Heaven. I think Murray values size on the backend a great deal. It'll be interesting to see how these guys pan out in a few years. As much as it's important to have Power's size on D, the Ducks need offense there too. I hope that aspect is included in their analysis of Power. I'm abstaining on whether I think they should take him, just think it's critical that they consider the offense issue.I bet Murray does a little dance on the way to announce the Ducks pick Power, no way he passes on Power.
What is Power's slapshot like ? I get the feeling Murray has long coveted a young Giant Dman who has a powerful slap shot.
Edit: just read that Power has a good slapshot but could further improve it as he's developing.
Having a good cannon on the blueline is a nice option to have to make the team less predictable in the future of scoring being mostly Zegras to Comtois, Terry to Henrique etc
Hoping they see potential in him to further develop his slapshot and overall offensive game.It does seem like a match made in Heaven. I think Murray values size on the backend a great deal. It'll be interesting to see how these guys pan out in a few years. As much as it's important to have Power's size on D, the Ducks need offense there too. I hope that aspect is included in their analysis of Power. I'm abstaining on whether I think they should take him, just think it's critical that they consider the offense issue.
It does seem like a match made in Heaven. I think Murray values size on the backend a great deal. It'll be interesting to see how these guys pan out in a few years. As much as it's important to have Power's size on D, the Ducks need offense there too. I hope that aspect is included in their analysis of Power. I'm abstaining on whether I think they should take him, just think it's critical that they consider the offense issue.