Disclaimer - not, in any form, trying to incite a riot.
No team or city is “due” for an opportunity to host.
If that is what the expectation is, then a massive breach of ethics would be involved in the OHL/CHL taking in the bid fee just to toss the tournament in the direction of the team that is “due”.
If London was bidding every year the OHL hosted, I would certainly expect them to have a front running shot - not because they are in the “league’s pocket” as many soap boxer’s claim, but rather they have the infrastructure/resources to put on an exceptional tournament. Based on this logic, this decision will be purely a business decision and will have zero to do with whatever team feels like they have the right to host. If Oshawa is awarded the tournament, it won’t be because they are due, it will be because the numbers from the Sault just couldn’t compete and if the Sault comes out on top, it isn’t because Oshawa has David Branch personally see to their snubbing but more so due to the new initiatives that the CHL is promoting in spreading the tournament around to smaller markets.
Based on articles and interviews, this may end up being the worst possible time frame for Oshawa to bid on this tournament. The OHL has had a run of larger market hosts and coinciding with the strategies/marketing push from the CHL, this may drastically alter the criteria in the boxes that the OHL is wanting the host city to check off.