Or Lambert. Or Savoie.
When I googled "plus-plus shot-release combo" it returned a bunch of COVID vaccination info
Nope.
Just means their list differed from FC’s. Video versus real scouting. We took overagers early which are heavily discounted in most draft lists. All depends if they play. Recrutes had 5 of our picks in his top 110. He likely loves our draft.
Savoie would be a good consolation prize.Or Lambert. Or Savoie.
EDIT: incidentally, Savoie and Guenther know eachother well and played in the AJHL together briefly while the WHL was shut down. As well as pretty much all of their minor hockey. Trading the 1-2 top scoring spots the whole way.
This is a little less interesting to me than that deep dive. Obviously the deep dive had some sample size issues but still REALLY interesting to me. Especially when I take the conclusions of the author and compare them to the opinions expressed by Button, Cosentino, Wheeler, Pronman, McKenzi, Scouch, Ferrari, etc, etc. It’s so much consensus. It seems like everyone loves this kid’s floor so much. It feels like a jinx but basically everyone says his floor is a first line forward in your team but maybe not the best one on the first line. Lol. It’s pretty rare for so many experts to say this kind of thing about the same kid.
This was the most Donald Duck analytic thing I've read in a good while. So, as an example, if one team had gotten the player ranked first at 11OA, that would have been less impressing than another team getting the 155th ranked player at 166. Good grief.
This is an analytics approach by somebody who only knows 2nd grade math, and holy shit is it f***ing atrocious.
The hard part about adding weight to an already subjective list is further subjective results. I think the writer would have done well to post previous draft accuracy to their lists when it comes to players that hit certain NHL games played numbers. Then we could take their list with some level of comfort.
