prizminferno
Registered User
- Feb 14, 2019
- 2,573
- 1,831
who they play next round is not a relevant issue. we should be focused on Wash/TB being the 2 and 3 seed. That's literally all that matters. Throw a game if you have to.
who they play next round is not a relevant issue. we should be focused on Wash/TB being the 2 and 3 seed. That's literally all that matters. Throw a game if you have to.
I'm more concerned with how they play than who they play next round. I could care less if they lose all 3 games what concerns me is how they lose , so far , not good.
I hope to see Frederic in over most of the other options. He can play much more physical than Ritchie and handle the heavy stuff and has decent hands. Maybe just maybe he can play with Krech, at least he is not a burner speed wise and Krech could keep up to him versus Kase or Jake.
How do tiebreakers for the round robin work? Head-to-Head, then goal difference if it's a 3-way tie? Does it draw from the regular season at all or just from the RR?
Only tiebreaker is regular season points %. If the Bruins tie anyone in points, they win the tiebreaker.How do tiebreakers for the round robin work? Head-to-Head, then goal difference if it's a 3-way tie? Does it draw from the regular season at all or just from the RR?
I believe they said if two teams are tied, it reverts to reg season standing so if Boston is tied in points with any of them, they would win the higher seed.How do tiebreakers for the round robin work? Head-to-Head, then goal difference if it's a 3-way tie? Does it draw from the regular season at all or just from the RR?
Nope, the sole tiebreaker is regular season standings, so if it’s a tie, we automatically win. But it’s still two points for regulation, one point for an OTL, and with minimal games, we can’t afford to tie for 60 minutes.
Only tiebreaker is regular season points %. If the Bruins tie anyone in points, they win the tiebreaker.
I mean he's calling a spade a spade. They have shown some chemistry here and there over the course of their years together... but too often they have none and generate nothing. Debrusk with Coyle and Bjork should force JD to play faster.
With | TOI With | CF% Diff | SF% Diff | GF% Diff | xGF% Diff | SCF% Diff | HDCF% Diff |
David Krejci | 1202 | -4.28 | -2.08 | -12.5 | 1.42 | 0.19 | 4.21 |
Charlie Coyle | 362 | 0.46 | 2.09 | 12.55 | -2.91 | -0.9 | -4.44 |
Karson Kuhlman | 240 | 2.16 | -2.07 | -15.44 | 4.98 | 7.84 | 5.51 |
Anders Bjork | 140 | -3.99 | -4.15 | -5.61 | -1.86 | -4.64 | 4.21 |
When does he shoulder some of the blame for the revolving door? No doubt about it he gets the leftovers and Bergeron gets fed first, but JD and Krech have been very Jekyll and Hyde together, that blame shouldnt be all on JD... also once Kuhlman is replaced by Kase, I don't think it's fair to say he's got bad wingers. Ritchie is a big body LW with good hands... obviously Krech played great with Looch, and Kase is a skilled guy who likes to shoot. Anyways, my main point is that some of this falls on Krejci.
Good. If we get to 4 points we're in good shape for at least the 2 seed. Though theoretically Philly could beat WSH and lose to TB in OT, while we beat TB in OT and then they'd both have 5 and we'd have 4. But chances of that are lower.
Pretty sure we're a lock to get one of the two. If Montreal beats Pitt, we'll get the 'Canes, if Pitt wins we get the Pens.We want Pitt or Carolina
Now that we've all but locked up last, might as well rest the stars to not risk injury. My game 4 forwards:
DeBrusk-Coyle-Bjork
Ritchie-Studnicka-Kase (if he can go, or Senyshen, forgot he's with the team)
Nordstron-Kuraly-Wagner
Lindholm-Frederick-Kuhlman