LadyStanley
Registered User
Paywall
Can GMMC find a willing trade partner from that list? How much might he have to include in deal to accomplish it?
Team has until 9am 10/9 to re-sign Lehner before free agency starts.
So what do the Knights do if no one on Fleury's list wants to talk trade? It seems like a lot of money to have invested in one position.
Is this another Marleau situation where a big pick has to go?VGK is going to have to retain at least 2 million and probably give up something else to boot. Management's fault for grossly overpaying Fleury to begin with.
Is this another Marleau situation where a big pick has to go?
So what do the Knights do if no one on Fleury's list wants to talk trade? It seems like a lot of money to have invested in one position.
Wild fan here,MAF kind of falls in line with what the Wild have been doing with Staal & Bjugstad. They're not afraid to spend actual money in hopes that a player can rebound, and they probably want a mentor for Kahkonen.
After the round robin Flower put up pretty good numbers in each of the 3 series. Stalock would make a pretty good low cost backup. They also kind of want a C, any C that can play up and down the lineup. After all, they took Bjugstad. Maybe there's a deal to be had there.
Wild fan here,
I think there could be a deal(s) with Vegas. However the price might be too much for Vegas to swallow.
Flower Trade
we could absorb Flower’s contract. Stalock would be a cheap option, or you could trade Dubnyk too since he has a pretty cheap buyout. Obviously Stalock is the cheaper option but if Vegas didn’t want the body and just wanted the cap space Dubnyk would be easy to handle.
now what would Minnesota want in return. Well they need Centers. More importantly they need young centers with high upside. I would guess they would target Krebs or Glass. I completely understand if they are untouchables, but I think the Wild would view Flower’s cap hit pretty high for what you are getting. For all we know he could be out of gas by next season pretty much needing a buyout. Maybe he will rebound. The Wild would want some insurance.
Dumba Trade?
any chance Vegas is interested in Dumba? I figured there could be some type of trade involving Dumba +assets for maybe Krebs/glass + Stastny. I don’t know how valuable Stastny was to you. I figured the Wild would need to take cap back to make Dumba work, and figured Krebs or Glass(whomever wasn’t traded) would just replace Stastny’s spot.
Fair enough, I figured the price would be too hard. Take good care of Whitecloud, I always have a soft spot for Bemidji State players.Big no on both. We'd be better off buying Fleury out than paying that type of price to move him. What we need on D is a legit #1 who can play all situations and match against top lines.
Can they afford another Stone-type ('Stoner'?) player?I can't see VGK trading either Glass nor Krebs (unless it's for another Stone-like player).
Trade Marchessault, Fleury, McNabb, Cousins get picks.
Sign Lehner, Stephenson, Nosek.
Retain 40% on Fleury.
Pacioretty-Glass-Stone
Smith-Karlsson-Tuch
Stephenson-Stastny-Roy
Carrier-Nosek-Reaves
Elvenes, Dugan, Brown, Quinney, Kolesar, etc.
Martinez-Theodore
Schmidt-DeMelo
Hague/Holden-Whitecloud
Coghlan, Bischoff, etc.
Lehner
Greiss/Mrazek/whatever
Stone probably gets the C but Theodore should. Smith, Schmidt, Pacioretty and Theodore can rotate A's.
Modify Deboer tactics to fit the team better with a sample of time he has had with the team. Fire Spott and change the power play.
Krebs and all prospects eligible go back to junior.
Pick 29, 68* (really 67), 91* (really 90), etc. and any 1st/2nd/3rd round picks accumulated in trades.
*Arizona forfeits pick 49.
Can they afford another Stone-type ('Stoner'?) player?
I think they'd love to move him.As a non-VGK fan, I'm wondering what the consensus is on Paul Stastny?
Do you believe he's likely to be dealt (and Cody Glass given a big role), or will Stastny's status be dependent on if the club is able to deal Marc-Andre Fleury?
Pretty similar to the lines I like, I might put it back to the Gallant era first two lines and have Glass between Tuch and Stephenson. For whatever reason Wild Bill just doesn't produce enough partnering with Stone and Patches, hoping he can find his scoring touch with his old partners provided Marchy isn't traded. I don't know what PDB saw that made him think the new combos made more sense.
Only question I have is on Krebs, I don't think the club gets any benefit for him going back to juniors do they? Isn't he already past his slide year on contract? I'd prefer seeing what he can do with the Silver Knights for a short stint and get him to the big club by mid-season.
Also I think we leave this a bit open to see what the GMs can do with the expansion draft situation. They might want to move Stastny ando/or Marchy to create some space to work with if they can make a deal that takes advantage of someone expecting to lose a player to Seattle.
Lots of other news coming out today, don't feel like linking.
Cody made of Glass needs to stay healthy. Trade Marchy and you have Tuch in the top 6 where he should be playing although he has his own injury issues also. Trade Stastny and Glass gets hurt and you have a giant hole at 2C with nothing further down the line up or in the system to replace it.