ahmedou
DOU
- Oct 7, 2017
- 19,244
- 18,632
Sucks we have to keep talking about this until October. So many things can change.
Two weeks from now the play ins will be completed and the phase 2 lottery happens. Lots to talk about after that.
Sucks we have to keep talking about this until October. So many things can change.
I know. It's going to be well over a year between drafts. That's never happened before. And it completely sucks for draft junkies.
I know. It's going to be well over a year between drafts. That's never happened before. And it completely sucks for draft junkies.
I know. It's going to be well over a year between drafts. That's never happened before. And it completely sucks for draft junkies.
I'm dying. It always lined up with my birthday. Didnt feel like my birthday this year.
What do you guys think of Tristen Robins as a pick with one of our seconds? He looks like a gamer from what I've seen.
We will either be talking about -
Lafreniere.
Holtz v. Quinn v. Raymond v. Lundell v. Askarov v. Perfetti v. Rossi
or
the shit left over at 16.
Pls be scenario A or B.
Although I think at 16, there will still be real good players available, it goes without saying that regarding the draft, scenerarios A & B are ideal.
And it sucks more considering I’m now in Montreal and was looking forward to actually going (though I’ve heard the experience is rather mundane)
I find it hard to get excited about many at the 16 range.. they would be good players that we would have to hope for a monumental development curve to be what we need.
9 is just a safe bet to give us a valuable piece to our future.
I agree that at 9, they'll have an option of a player who will being value.
At 16, I think the player we hope drops there is Seth Jarvis. Different draft rankings have him in many different spots.
Elite Prospects: 13
Future Considerations: 11
ISS Hockey: 28
Craig Button: 23
McKeen's: 12
Consolidated Ranking: 15
Bob McKenzie: 18
NHL Central Scouting NA Skaters: 11
So he's a little all over the place. Most of them have him mid-1st.
Would you take Jarvis at 9th if Holtz, Rossi, Perfetti, and Raymond are already taken?
I find it hard to get excited about many at the 16 range.. they would be good players that we would have to hope for a monumental development curve to be what we need.
9 is just a safe bet to give us a valuable piece to our future.
It is..
You get to see the movement on the floor,so you're thinking maybe something is going down, but it never does.
I attended the 2008 draft and all Bob Gainey did was drink a lot of coffee and go to the bathroom. We saw Stamkos with an Islanders jersey and was like "WHAT HE GOT TRADED ", but he was just picking it up for his friend, Matt Martin.
I find it hard to get excited about many at the 16 range.. they would be good players that we would have to hope for a monumental development curve to be what we need.
9 is just a safe bet to give us a valuable piece to our future.
I live under the assumption we'll draft 9th. If we end up drafting 1st overall I'll be thrilled but I'm not counting on it .
It's better to be pleasantly surprised and happy if it happens than hope for it and be dissapointed if it doesn't.
These forums seems unanimous that we can grab a good player at 9th to build this franchise towards better years
Back to Holtz vs Quinn again then