Speculation: 2020-2021 Sharks Roster Discussion Part 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

sharski

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
5,619
4,584
DW: how much you wanna make a bet i can throw a stanley cup over them mountains... yeah... Tavares signs here for $13 million we’d have been stanley cup champions, no doubt... no doubt in my mind... you better believe things would’ve been different...
 

Lebanezer

I'unno? Coast Guard?
Jul 24, 2006
14,812
10,411
San Jose
DW: how much you wanna make a bet i can throw a stanley cup over them mountains... yeah... Tavares signs here for $13 million we’d have been stanley cup champions, no doubt... no doubt in my mind... you better believe things would’ve been different...
If the Sharks had won the McDavid lottery there’s no question in my mind they would have won the Stanley cup in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bowie22

FunkyPhin

Registered User
Feb 2, 2011
1,677
923
Vancouver
If the Sharks had won the McDavid lottery there’s no question in my mind they would have won the Stanley cup in 2016.

Imagine if the Sharks played the same teams the Kings did in the SCF, instead we get probably the best version of the pens in the Crosby era. :(
 

Pavelski2112

Bold as Boognish
Dec 15, 2011
14,525
9,222
San Jose, California
The thought of a 2nd line comprised of Couture-McDavid-Donskoi line steamrolling the Penguins, that would have been great. Plus the publicity of McDavid as a rookie going against Crosby would’ve been too good. You messed it all up Bettman.
Tbf it was pretty hilarious to see Bill Daly's face when he picked up the Edmonton card
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
15,800
5,060
Talking about horseshoes and nails, I am thinking about 2012. To recap, DW believed that after that season that the Sharks needed a refresh. Even though that plan was stalled by the success of the 2013 and 2014 teams (to his credit, DW didn't fight the on-ice results), once things fell apart in 2014 he fully committed to the rebuild, and by 2016 the Sharks were a contender again.

What if Wilson treated 2018 like 2012? He doesn't extend Kane and doesn't go for Karlsson. Since Jones is actually terrible, and the Sharks don't have Karlsson or Kane, they are at best a bubble team. DW tells his players that he isn't planning on competing, and between the deadline he is able to sell off (at a minimum) Vlasic, Thornton, Pavelski, and Donskoi as the Sharks don't make the playoffs. The next season the Sharks are no better, and DW still sells off players like Dillion and Sorensen. Conceivably, they are even worse than the actual 2020 Sharks but let's say they just get the Stuzle pick and trade for Donato/Dubnyk:

Hertl-Couture-Labanc
Donato-Norris-Meier
Balcers-Tierney-Marleau
Stuzle-Gregor-Nieto

Ferraro-Burns
Knyzhov-DeMelo (if not traded away)
Simek-Braun (Sharks keep him for veteran presence)

Jones (if they didn't manage to trade him while he had decent value in 2019)
Dubnyk

Not to mention:
  • Assets obtained for selling aforementioned players.
  • Prospects drafted with the extra picks in 2019 (by my count, an extra first from not signing Kane, an extra 2nd from not trading for Nyquist, and an extra 2nd for not trading for Karlsson assuming the Hoffman deal is still done).
  • Prospects drafted with the picks they keep (other than Stuzle) in 2020 (by my count, an extra 3rd from not trading for Nyquist.)
Plus, given two seasons of not making the playoffs, and with plenty of cap space, it is almost inevitable that DW targets some big fish at the most cromulent time. Maybe the Sharks can sign Alex Pietrangelo or Taylor Hall, or get some assets for a cap dump? I mean, just adding someone like Robin Lehner would probably make this a playoff team.
 

KirbyDots

Registered User
May 10, 2011
11,627
3,191
Talking about horseshoes and nails, I am thinking about 2012. To recap, DW believed that after that season that the Sharks needed a refresh. Even though that plan was stalled by the success of the 2013 and 2014 teams (to his credit, DW didn't fight the on-ice results), once things fell apart in 2014 he fully committed to the rebuild, and by 2016 the Sharks were a contender again.

What if Wilson treated 2018 like 2012? He doesn't extend Kane and doesn't go for Karlsson. Since Jones is actually terrible, and the Sharks don't have Karlsson or Kane, they are at best a bubble team. DW tells his players that he isn't planning on competing, and between the deadline he is able to sell off (at a minimum) Vlasic, Thornton, Pavelski, and Donskoi as the Sharks don't make the playoffs. The next season the Sharks are no better, and DW still sells off players like Dillion and Sorensen. Conceivably, they are even worse than the actual 2020 Sharks but let's say they just get the Stuzle pick and trade for Donato/Dubnyk:

Hertl-Couture-Labanc
Donato-Norris-Meier
Balcers-Tierney-Marleau
Stuzle-Gregor-Nieto

Ferraro-Burns
Knyzhov-DeMelo (if not traded away)
Simek-Braun (Sharks keep him for veteran presence)

Jones (if they didn't manage to trade him while he had decent value in 2019)
Dubnyk

Not to mention:
  • Assets obtained for selling aforementioned players.
  • Prospects drafted with the extra picks in 2019 (by my count, an extra first from not signing Kane, an extra 2nd from not trading for Nyquist, and an extra 2nd for not trading for Karlsson assuming the Hoffman deal is still done).
  • Prospects drafted with the picks they keep (other than Stuzle) in 2020 (by my count, an extra 3rd from not trading for Nyquist.)
Plus, given two seasons of not making the playoffs, and with plenty of cap space, it is almost inevitable that DW targets some big fish at the most cromulent time. Maybe the Sharks can sign Alex Pietrangelo or Taylor Hall, or get some assets for a cap dump? I mean, just adding someone like Robin Lehner would probably make this a playoff team.
This isn't useful. You can't simply assume we would finish in the same spot to get Stuzle if we didn't make the Karlsson trade and there's no telling if the team would have made the Donato/Dubnyk moves if we weren't in the position we were in over the summer. Hindsight is 20/20, there was a history of injury with Karlsson but no indication it would have been so extensive, it was a calculated risk. That said, some mistakes are more easily avoidable. For example, the Vlasic contract, which is far too much money for a defensive dman. Would we have been better off if we had tanked a season or two earlier? Maybe. It's also possible that we would have finished middle 10 in the league and floundered, not every rebuild works out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDmitriy

Karl Prime

Registered User
Feb 13, 2017
4,601
4,340
If Wilson hadn't been able to trade for Karlsson, maybe he trades for some other top D-man like Ekman-Larsson. It's impossible to know what would have happened had the Karlsson trade not happened, or if he didn't sign. (After a successful 18-19 season why would Wilson decide to rebuild? Likely he tries to bolster the team for another run in that instance.)
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
15,800
5,060
This isn't useful.

:laugh: I mean....yeah. That's this entire forum!

You can't simply assume we would finish in the same spot to get Stuzle if we didn't make the Karlsson trade and there's no telling if the team would have made the Donato/Dubnyk moves if we weren't in the position we were in over the summer. Hindsight is 20/20, there was a history of injury with Karlsson but no indication it would have been so extensive, it was a calculated risk. That said, some mistakes are more easily avoidable. For example, the Vlasic contract, which is far too much money for a defensive dman. Would we have been better off if we had tanked a season or two earlier? Maybe. It's also possible that we would have finished middle 10 in the league and floundered, not every rebuild works out.

If Wilson hadn't been able to trade for Karlsson, maybe he trades for some other top D-man like Ekman-Larsson. It's impossible to know what would have happened had the Karlsson trade not happened, or if he didn't sign. (After a successful 18-19 season why would Wilson decide to rebuild? Likely he tries to bolster the team for another run in that instance.)

The greater assumption in my alternate history is DW deciding not to contend after 2017-2018. Without Kane and Karlsson, and with trading all the major pieces, I can't see the Sharks being better in 2020. The presumption is that DW wouldn't have targeted a big fish until the "2020" offseason, which I contend would make the team even better this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FunkyPhin

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
32,399
12,604
Seems like Ottawa's got a little win streak going on. If that keeps up, clear cut bottom 5 is looking to be SJ, ANA, BUF, NYR, and DET. I think we could drop below ANA and NYR at some point since they have some pretty high end prospects on the verge of productivity. BUF and DET have a little too many issues to rise above us it seems. The wildcard for us would be how much can Karlsson contribute and if Jones will continue to be the starter, even though he has by far the worst results of any goalie in the league.
 

OffSydes

#tank2014/5
Aug 14, 2011
3,387
2,065
In order to get Eichel you have to take Skinner, do you do it and how do you make it work?
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,258
11,836
California
In order to get Eichel you have to take Skinner, do you do it and how do you make it work?
They’d have to take Vlasic and either Jones or Couture and then I’d send them some futures but not nearly as much as without Skinner. I think I’d offer something like

Vlasic+Couture+Labanc+Kniazev+True for Skinner+Eichel
 

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
4,649
4,462
In order to get Eichel you have to take Skinner, do you do it and how do you make it work?

No, and i dont think any team is willing to take 9m until 2027 just to Eichel until 2026.

But for fun, i think the sharks would have to offer Meier and or Hertl in addition to getting vlasic and jones off the books. The former two represent guys that will need to be extended within the lifespan of the Eichel/Skinner contracts and the Sharks probably wouldnt be able to afford them.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,376
13,783
Folsom
In order to get Eichel you have to take Skinner, do you do it and how do you make it work?

You do it yes but I don't think the Sharks can make that work without either sending a claused player or sending both Meier and Labanc back with other dumps like Sorensen, Simek, and Dubnyk while having Buffalo retain 1.5 mil on Skinner. Can't see Buffalo doing something like that because it will impact their futures return on Eichel. We wouldn't be giving them Ferraro in that situation and they'd probably only get one or two picks/prospects instead of the haul they'd get sending Eichel on his own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigDmitriy

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,376
13,783
Folsom
That easy, Doug Wilson works his magic... Vlassic, Jones, Dahlen, 6th (2022) :for: Eichel, Skinner, 2nd (2021) I'd make that trade 11/10 times

I just can't see either Vlasic or Jones being okay with going to Buffalo. It'd probably be Meier, Labanc, Simek, Sorensen, and a couple picks and prospects for Eichel and Skinner. And if they can make it where they only move one of their 1sts the next couple seasons at most then I'd be fine with eating Skinner's contract to get Eichel. But the chances Buffalo would actually require this seems slim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad