UncleRico
Registered User
- May 8, 2017
- 7,919
- 9,880
Current Prospect Rankings:
1) Jack Studnicka (90.9% of the votes)
1) Jack Studnicka (90.9% of the votes)
Last edited:
I put up this one a little early because Studnicka was running away with the other one and I have meetings later in the day.
When your #2 prospect is a goalie who hasn't played a professional game, your stable of prospect might suck somewhat.
When your #2 prospect is a goalie who hasn't played a professional game, your stable of prospect might suck somewhat.
Just saying, Zane McInGoth never ranked all that high here. He didn't have a Richter, but did have 3 very solid NCAA seasons. And he did what most goalie prospects do - yo-yo around between lights out and mediocrity for a few years before being cut loose.Well when you carry your hockey program for 3 years and then cap your NCAA career of with a Richter Award and a Hobey Baker finalist, you're going to have some hype.
Two years younger. It doesn't matter for absolutely everyone, but it is very important for most.Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.
Two years younger. It doesn't matter for absolutely everyone, but it is very important for most.
For just about any defenseman that plays in the AHL, every season spent there without showing good production lowers your ceiling. Boychuks are rare, and even he was a 2nd pairing guy.
Just saying, Zane McInGoth never ranked all that high here. He didn't have a Richter, but did have 3 very solid NCAA seasons. And he did what most goalie prospects do - yo-yo around between lights out and mediocrity for a few years before being cut loose.
McIntyre is actually a good object lesson for Swayman, Vladar and probably goalie prospects in general. Three years of high performance in the NCAA isn't much to go by. 31 games with a .930 Sv% in your second professional season isn't much to go by. Young goalies just don't give you much to go by.
Funny, I don't put as much credence in his spectacular 2020 season as I do his first two seasons. If Swayman's numbers were just mediocre those two seasons, I'd see him more of a Joey Daccord (speaking of crappy programs). Regardless, I'm not sure of the value of deriving goaltender quality from a team's winning percentage.The difference was Zane actually played for a solid program. Swayman stood on his head most nights to keep Maine in games. Here are the last 6 years of Maine's winning%
14-15 - .397 w%
15-16 - .289 w%
16-17 - .361 w%
17-18 - .526 w%
18-19 - .472 w%
19-20 - .603 w%
So in the last 3 years with Swayman being #1 they were 33-29-10. The three years prior without Swayman they were 18-42-6. They didn't get an influx of high end talent as their not known for cranking out lots of NHL players. So what exactly was the cause for them going from a Hockey East door mat to a over .500 team that was around the top 5 in Hockey East the last 3 years?
It’s just because I’ve seen Vaak play more games really. I haVe only seen zboril play two games. Third line minutes. He was solid though. I think they are both nhl players.Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.
Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.
Yeah, he's getting the popular vote but wait till we hear from some of those battlegrounds.Current Prospect Rankings:
1) Jack Studnicka (90.9% of the votes)
I find this so depressing. It basically says we have one true NHL prospects and a bunch of hopes and dreamsCurrent Prospect Rankings:
1) Jack Studnicka (90.9% of the votes)
It says that Studnicka is widely viewed as the best prospect in the organization. I think you're reading too much into it.I find this so depressing. It basically says we have one true NHL prospects and a bunch of hopes and dreams
I realize that. But I also know what Studnicka projects as, and having him the unanimous best prospect in the organization is depressingIt says that Studnicka is widely viewed as the best prospect in the organization. I think you're reading too much into it.