Prospect Info: 2020-2021 HF Bruins Prospects Rankings Poll #2

Who is the Bruins #2 Overall prospect?

  • Trent Frederic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Oskar Steen

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Victor Berglund

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Quinn Olson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jack Achan

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kyle Keyser

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mason Lohrei

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Dustyn McFaul

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Matias Mantykivi

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
7,919
9,880
I put up this one a little early because Studnicka was running away with the other one and I have meetings later in the day.
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,084
20,843
Tyler, TX
I put up this one a little early because Studnicka was running away with the other one and I have meetings later in the day.

Yeah Stud took that in a landslide. Tough one for me between Swayman and Urho here- went with Swayman but really it could have gone the other way.
 

Saxon Eric

Registered User
Dec 18, 2005
20,277
27,321
Went Vladar as he was excellent last season
Swayman was excellent too but I couldn't pull the trigger this early
Couldn't justify Vaakanainen with his consistency/motivation issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleRico

PepeBostones

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2002
914
1,433
I had Jeremy Swayman here and nothing has really changed. I'm just worried about all prospects not playing.
 

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
5,709
9,087
When your #2 prospect is a goalie who hasn't played a professional game, your stable of prospect might suck somewhat.
 

UncleRico

Registered User
May 8, 2017
7,919
9,880
When your #2 prospect is a goalie who hasn't played a professional game, your stable of prospect might suck somewhat.

depends on how you view prospects. He’s not NHL ready but plenty of people may feel he has the highest ceiling or best chance of being a great player.
 

JAD

Old School
Sponsor
Nov 19, 2009
2,575
3,000
Florida
Looking at who is left on the list,
I'm thinking Zboril might be the next "most ready" prospect with a couple others real close, but Swayman might be the next best prospect.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,010
17,980
Connecticut
When your #2 prospect is a goalie who hasn't played a professional game, your stable of prospect might suck somewhat.

Well when you carry your hockey program for 3 years and then cap your NCAA career of with a Richter Award and a Hobey Baker finalist, you're going to have some hype.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleRico

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
5,709
9,087
Well when you carry your hockey program for 3 years and then cap your NCAA career of with a Richter Award and a Hobey Baker finalist, you're going to have some hype.
Just saying, Zane McInGoth never ranked all that high here. He didn't have a Richter, but did have 3 very solid NCAA seasons. And he did what most goalie prospects do - yo-yo around between lights out and mediocrity for a few years before being cut loose.

McIntyre is actually a good object lesson for Swayman, Vladar and probably goalie prospects in general. Three years of high performance in the NCAA isn't much to go by. 31 games with a .930 Sv% in your second professional season isn't much to go by. Young goalies just don't give you much to go by.
 
Last edited:

PepeBostones

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2002
914
1,433
Let's hope for the best. Here are some active goalies that made an impact going from college to NHL. History show some great goalies but just look at the ones played last year. Interestingly Swayman's Maine has produced three of the goalies active in NHL.
G - Goalie College NHL Team Nation NHL Draft Rnd Years in College
A - Connor Hellebuyck UMass Lowell WPG US 5th 2
A - Cory Schneider Boston College NJ US 1st 3
A - Jonthan Quick Massachusetts LA US 3rd 2
A - Jimmy Howard Maine DET US 2nd 3
A - Ben Bishop Maine DAL US 3rd 3
A - Ryan Miller Michigan State ANA US 5th 3
B - Thatcher Demko Boston College VAN US 2nd 3
B - Brian Elliott Wisconsin PHI CAN 9th 4
B - Carter Hutton UMass Lowell STL CAN FA 4
B - Cam Talbot Alabama Huntsville EDM CAN FA 3
B - Scott Darling Maine CAR US 6th 2
C - Al Montoya Michigan EDM, MTL US 1st 3
C - Chad Johnson Alaska BUF CAN 5th 4
C - Curtis McElhinney Coloado College TOR CAN 6th 4
C - Mike Condon Princeton OTT US FA
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BlackFrancis

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
5,709
9,087
Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.
Two years younger. It doesn't matter for absolutely everyone, but it is very important for most.

For just about any defenseman that plays in the AHL, every season spent there without showing good production lowers your ceiling. Boychuks are rare, and even he was a 2nd pairing guy.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,393
17,824
Connecticut
Two years younger. It doesn't matter for absolutely everyone, but it is very important for most.

For just about any defenseman that plays in the AHL, every season spent there without showing good production lowers your ceiling. Boychuks are rare, and even he was a 2nd pairing guy.

That's fair.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,010
17,980
Connecticut
Just saying, Zane McInGoth never ranked all that high here. He didn't have a Richter, but did have 3 very solid NCAA seasons. And he did what most goalie prospects do - yo-yo around between lights out and mediocrity for a few years before being cut loose.

McIntyre is actually a good object lesson for Swayman, Vladar and probably goalie prospects in general. Three years of high performance in the NCAA isn't much to go by. 31 games with a .930 Sv% in your second professional season isn't much to go by. Young goalies just don't give you much to go by.

The difference was Zane actually played for a solid program. Swayman stood on his head most nights to keep Maine in games. Here are the last 6 years of Maine's winning%

14-15 - .397 w%
15-16 - .289 w%
16-17 - .361 w%
17-18 - .526 w%
18-19 - .472 w%
19-20 - .603 w%

So in the last 3 years with Swayman being #1 they were 33-29-10. The three years prior without Swayman they were 18-42-6. They didn't get an influx of high end talent as their not known for cranking out lots of NHL players. So what exactly was the cause for them going from a Hockey East door mat to a over .500 team that was around the top 5 in Hockey East the last 3 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinsFanSince94

BlackFrancis

Athletic Supporter Patch Partner
Dec 14, 2013
5,709
9,087
The difference was Zane actually played for a solid program. Swayman stood on his head most nights to keep Maine in games. Here are the last 6 years of Maine's winning%

14-15 - .397 w%
15-16 - .289 w%
16-17 - .361 w%
17-18 - .526 w%
18-19 - .472 w%
19-20 - .603 w%

So in the last 3 years with Swayman being #1 they were 33-29-10. The three years prior without Swayman they were 18-42-6. They didn't get an influx of high end talent as their not known for cranking out lots of NHL players. So what exactly was the cause for them going from a Hockey East door mat to a over .500 team that was around the top 5 in Hockey East the last 3 years?
Funny, I don't put as much credence in his spectacular 2020 season as I do his first two seasons. If Swayman's numbers were just mediocre those two seasons, I'd see him more of a Joey Daccord (speaking of crappy programs). Regardless, I'm not sure of the value of deriving goaltender quality from a team's winning percentage.

I don't know. Goalies are voodoo. Current and former goalies can't tell a good one from a stiff. If they can't get it right, what hope do I have?
 

Kegs

Registered User
Nov 10, 2010
3,529
4,050
Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.
It’s just because I’ve seen Vaak play more games really. I haVe only seen zboril play two games. Third line minutes. He was solid though. I think they are both nhl players.
 

BruinsNetwork

Guest
Surprised so many feel Vaakanainen is a better prospect than Zboril.

Well I guess there’s a discrepancy between the better prospect and the prospect with higher potential, as is the same for the entire voting process.

Vaakanainen has high potential and has age on his side.

Zboril is the better player right now, though he’s older and has more games under his belt.

I think Jack Ahcan is a better prospect than the both of them, personally. He’s low-risk, high-energy and motivated each shift he’s on the ice. Elite skater with high-end vision and first-round talent across the board. He’s small, which of course will hurt him in the NHL, but he knows how to overcome his size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackFrancis

Don Cherry

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,891
2,283
Current Prospect Rankings:

1) Jack Studnicka (90.9% of the votes)
Yeah, he's getting the popular vote but wait till we hear from some of those battlegrounds.

I picked Beecher simply because he hasn't proven to be a stiff yet like so many already have. He's got size and seems to be aggressive based on his PIMs.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,354
21,792
I would of went Swayman here.

I only see two prospects on the Bruins that have star/core level potential on the Bruins, Studnicka and Swayman.

Sure he could end up another Zane McIntyre or Kevin Regan. But I have a good feeling about this kid. He's got size (6'2) and like many have pointed out, carried a bad-to-mediocre Maine Blackbears program for the past 3 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinsFanSince94

Dicky113

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
4,407
3,283
It says that Studnicka is widely viewed as the best prospect in the organization. I think you're reading too much into it.
I realize that. But I also know what Studnicka projects as, and having him the unanimous best prospect in the organization is depressing
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad