- Jul 25, 2012
- 39,647
- 34,363
Karlsson at 10 >>> fowler at 6.5I’ll take Fowler at 6.5 over Karlsson at 10-12 pretty easily.
Like i said its not realistic... but karlsson is basically exactly what this team needs
Karlsson at 10 >>> fowler at 6.5I’ll take Fowler at 6.5 over Karlsson at 10-12 pretty easily.
He had ONE even strength goal this year, 22 of his 45 points (of which 20 were assists) were on the PP where he was paired with Burns, and he was 5th in +/- for their regular defensemen. He’s better. He’s not 4M better. Especially not the way this team is constructed.Karlsson at 10 >>> fowler at 6.5
Like i said its not realistic... but karlsson is basically exactly what this team needs
He really is...He had ONE even strength goal this year, 22 of his 45 points (of which 20 were assists) were on the PP where he was paired with Burns, and he was 5th in +/- for their regular defensemen. He’s better. He’s not 4M better. Especially not the way this team is constructed.
He’s not the guy he was pre-heel injury.
He really is...
Fowler put up 6 points as our main pp guy... 6. So ek put up 16 more points in less games on pp, while comin back from significant injury.
He had 23 points at ES.... oddly enough thats the same # of points cam had in total.
+/- is dumb but cause you brought it up ek being 5th in +/-, fowler was 6th(technically worse but ill only count 6).
I get it you think some people are hard on little cam... but hes really just not as good as some of you like to pretend
except they did when he was paired with Despres. That pairing was the best I've seen Fowler play, shame the Avs had to end Despres career.One of these days the Ducks will find the right partner for Cam. And then he will show us all how great he is. Stop it.
Hes on decline, he was good with beauch and despres.... i felt like the changes in the nhl should have helped a player like fowler... but for whstever reason it didnt.One of these days the Ducks will find the right partner for Cam. And then he will show us all how great he is. Stop it.
Cause its a discussion board... half the stuff discussed isnt going to happen. Doesnt mean we cant or shouldnt discussI don't even know why this discussion is taking place because, like it or not, Fowler isn't going anywhere. The organization clearly values him highly and he can only be traded to 3 teams.
That's not even getting into how bad of an idea Karlsson is with the way he is playing and the kind of money he'll be looking for.
There is only 1.5 years between them.I brought up +/- because you’re acting like he can carry the team. He managed that +/- while playing with Burns. His PP points were from playing with Burns and his 7G and 28A. Show me the PP weapons Fowler got to play with?
Larsson<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Burns
You’re going to bring up Karlsson’s serious injury then pretend Fowler was healthy? Fowler had to get over the shoulder injury last spring then had his face shattered mid-season. He also played for RC. That’s worth -10 points all by itself. And he played all of 6 extra games.
I don’t think Fowler is all that good. I think he is a 2 who played like a 3 for much of this year, and who can peak as a 1 at times. I also think that the organization has done an abysmal job getting complementary partners for him who wouldn’t be 6-7 guys if they weren’t with him, and would like to see how he would look next to a legit mid or top-pairing guy (much less another Norris winner).
Karlsson is significantly better. He’s also significantly slower than he was before that foot injury, not young, and is clearly dealing with another lower body injury. I think he’s not worth 10-12 (and he’s not signing here for 10 so let’s stop pretending). I also think that his injuries are significantly more risky to his skating that Fowler’s are, and that he’s Perry/Kesler on that contract.
Completely agree.Hes on decline, he was good with beauch and despres.... i felt like the changes in the nhl should have helped a player like fowler... but for whstever reason it didnt.
Could be lack of confidence, im ok seein how he looks w/ new coach but if hes the fowler from last 2 years we need to move on.
maybe having to play under Randy under the last two seasons, who made all our defensemen look worse had something to do with it...Hes on decline, he was good with beauch and despres.... i felt like the changes in the nhl should have helped a player like fowler... but for whstever reason it didnt.
Could be lack of confidence, im ok seein how he looks w/ new coach but if hes the fowler from last 2 years we need to move on.
maybe, but he won't be 4-5 million dollars better, especially if his nagging groin injury keeps happening or he hurts his heel again.There is only 1.5 years between them.
. Id be willing to bet karlsson is much better player over the next 7 years.
Again its not realistic that we get karlsson, but he is exactly what we need. I think we should trade fowler before he becomes our new kesler/perry
I agree he will likely be better. I sincerely doubt he will be twice as good though, which is about where that contract would probably land with us.There is only 1.5 years between them.
. Id be willing to bet karlsson is much better player over the next 7 years.
Again its not realistic that we get karlsson, but he is exactly what we need. I think we should trade fowler before he becomes our new kesler/perry
If you really want Karlsson, Wild Bill is an upcoming UFA, and I think Anaheim needs another good forward more than a defenseman.
I've already said I wasnt a fan of the way Carlyle coached this season and Dotchin was the best of the bottom pairing.Yes they are. Even your hero RC didn’t want to play them. But I agree the others are not any better. Hence me agreeing with you that I would like BM to acquire what you described in your earlier post.
I've already said I wasnt a fan of the way Carlyle coached this season and Dotchin was the best of the bottom pairing.
Name a realistic option that's available?
Adam McQuaid but I doubt Murray spends that much. You're talking about a #6 you're not gonna get a Manson clone or NurseI have no idea but I do know those two guys are scrubs and I’m pretty confident neither will play many games in the NHL next season.
I know you love the scrappy players so I’m all ears as to who you think the Ducks can realistically get as a tough 5/6 dman who can actually play hockey and is not a scrub like Schenn and Dotchin. Again I agree with you that a tough player is needed but I want you to name some players that the Ducks can get for that role instead of just simply labeling anyone who questions you.