Il Mediano
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2018
- 1,837
- 690
The frustration is that Colts will pretty much have to win with the cheapest roster in the entire league. You pretty much have to destroy every draft. One miss is a big step backwards.
People equate big free agent signings to winning. The NFL doesn't work like that.
Take a look a big signings of 2 or 3 seasons ago , and tell me how many of them actually moved the needle. Really, most of them are just money wasted.
The roster is only cheap for the time-being. Eventually, we'll be tight to the cap.
And take a look at how many of our contributors weren't drafted by us last season -- he doesn't rely solely on the draft.
That was the issue with Polian. Remember? He was killing the draft until they started picking the Anthony Gonzalez and Donald Browns of the world. Then the OL was a problem, D was terrible, it was a mess.
Ballard's far more active than Polian was. We make plenty of signings , they just aren't the first wave players. Why sign a guy to bad deal , when you can find incredible value with Hunt, Autry et al?
Polian was extremely dogmatic in his approach , and his philosophy was entirely different than Ballard. He valued skill positions to an insane degree , Ballard does not. He would never draft a guard in the first round , Ballard took one in the top 10. Ballard believes in having a complete roster, Polian loaded one side of the ball. Ballard believes a team should be built from the inside out , Polian was the opposite.
I could write an essay here , but other than believing we should draft, develop and sign our own- they couldn't be more different.
Again, Ballard is far more active in finding external solutions. Just because he didn't drop a billion on Landon Collins , doesn't mean he isn't active. And it doesn't mean he won't find good, productive players.
Last free agency , the Colts ranked #1 in value for money spent. He did really well in free agency last season. It wasn't just a home-run draft.
Big names don't equate to a good free agency period. In fact, most of the time, it's just bad money being tossed around.
If you QB play is below average you invest in QB, overpay if needed. If your pass protection is below average, you overpay.
Sure, and all of March/April last year, I heard Colts fans complain that we didn't go after Norwell and drop a ton of cash. What happened? Norwell had a poor season , is really overpaid , and Ballard drafted Nelson and Glowinski (who he picked up off the scrap-heap) played extremely well on peanuts. We also just re-signed that scrap-heap acquisition (along with Desir) to extremely team-friendly deals.
Again, big money does not equate to a good free agency period. At all.
On defense, it pass rush or CB. In Colts' system, CB is a lower priority, but pass rush is MASSIVE. Overpaying there is worth it
This draft is loaded with DL talent. Which Free agent pass-rusher do you think he should've overpaid?
Keep in mind the production we got from Autry and Hunt , and how much we spent on them.