- Jun 24, 2012
- 83,299
- 148,995
Why is Tomasino not a top 10 pick?
Very few posters ever even mention Tomasino, let alone as a Hab option.
Why is Tomasino not a top 10 pick?
You would compare him to who
I could see it in the no one falls scenario. Triple? Yup. LD? Yup. Young player with developmental upside? Yup. USDP? Yup.He said the Habs are the team that seemed to have the most interest in him.
Yandle, Leddy. Potential top pairing guy but #2 or 3, not a #1.
So far I haven't met another Habs fan who wants Suzuki.
Am I alone...?
I could see it in the no one falls scenario. Triple? Yup. LD? Yup. Young player with developmental upside? Yup. USDP? Yup.
Timmins said the team could opt for the triple over the home run.What does "Triple" refer to?
He has next to no offensive upsideWhy is Tomasino not a top 10 pick?
2019 Entry Draft Thread: Part IIII’m claiming York. I was the first to pump his tires if I recall.
Timmins said the team could opt for the triple over the home run.
Agreed. I love both of them.McMichael and Matthew Robertson are not getting the recognition they deserve.
I could see it in the no one falls scenario. Triple? Yup. LD? Yup. Young player with developmental upside? Yup. USDP? Yup.
Tomasino will be the highest scoring player on his team next year and will close in on 85-90 pts. Criminally underrated.He has next to no offensive upside
I was referencing the Timmins quote.Hm, wrong jabroni then I recall someone telling me he had very little upside and that he didn't like the way he played. I thought York was a prototypical high-octane offensive D at the time and someone said nah hes much safer. Wrong dude. Maybe G0bias or NotPro.
Agreed. I love both of them.
????????????????????? Literally
He’s mine!!!!
He turns 18 the 28th of july. Elite speed and great hands.Tomasino will be the highest scoring player on his team next year and will close in on 85-90 pts. Criminally underrated.
Tomasino will be the highest scoring player on his team next year and will close in on 85-90 pts. Criminally underrated.
I think Tomasino and Suzuki are viable options at forward along with Newhook. Possibly also Brink. It's not cut and dried, Newhook or bust at forward, especially with two selections in round 2 to get a defenseman.So far I haven't met another Habs fan who wants Suzuki.
Am I alone...?
Obviously incorrect, he's a fantastic skater with a good shot, high hockey IQ, filthy hands and good vision. Also works harder off-ice than most. His upside is Arvidsson-esque, maybe even higher. Then again, I'm sure similar things were said about Robert Thomas prior to being drafted.He has next to no offensive upside
1st part no, Akil Thomas will likely still be on the team barring a full reset by the Ice Dogs. Second part absolutely correct, he's moved into my list of targets for 15, would be thrilled to get him at that spot.Tomasino will be the highest scoring player on his team next year and will close in on 85-90 pts. Criminally underrated.
I have the same opinion than yours. Im wondering what could be the production about york without hugues/bboldy/ zegras/caufield in his team. Cause im taking all these forward before york. York is undersized and very not physical. At his best. He could be a victor mete. But. I like mete but at this range (15th). We can pick better imoI think we are taking way too seriously the TVA article where York told about perceived Habs interest to a Mtl reporter. We don't know what he told , say, a Mini reporter if there was even a conversation. I don't buy this story, just some speculation. Lavoie also said that his interview went very well and lasted longer than anticipated. I highly doubt York is the pick because it would not be very consistent with TT's history. When was the last time he drafted an undersized dman in the first round, particularly one who is really lacking in the physical department? Never happened. And in his pre-draft media meet last year when asked about Q. Hughes, TT said he would always have trouble defending because of his size, basically reiterating his draft history. And if we look at the under 6 Ds TT drafted in recent years - Mete, Romanov and Harris - they all can flat out fly, something York can't although he is not a bad skater at all. Romanov is a compact horse who drills pros in the KHL, Harris is definitely stronger than York and even Mete was pretty solid in this area against his peers. The dmen who fit the historical profile are Broberg, Harley and Seider. I personally hope for one of Harley or Seider if Newhook or another good forward is not available.
As for York, vanilla is the right word, Mrb1p. In the games I saw at U18, I saw guys like Hughes, Brink and other forwards make great plays. I did not see York do that. Yes, he has the skills to play with them but did not show in those games that he could drive the play like a real PP QB. He is pumped by his supper talented forwards in the same way Juolevi was on team Finland and London. If we go in that offensive LD direction, it should be Harley or Heinola, in that order, but I doubt Heinola is the pick for the above reason - size/skating. Harley is almost eight months younger than York, and made a bunch of nice plays both in transition and in the o-zone at the u18 and by all accounts did that in the OHL. For the all-around guy, Seider is my choice and fits TT's profile to a tee.
York is more talented than he gets credited for. He’s a guy who a year from now could be thought of as underdrafted. I really think playing on that stacked US team hurt him more than it helped him. I think if you put him in a situation where he’s the man, he could really blossom.
That said, he’s the guy you take if no one else falls.