NHL Entry Draft 2019 Entry Draft Discussion

Discussion in 'Ottawa Senators' started by BondraTime, Sep 16, 2018.

  1. Boud

    Boud Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,204
    Likes Received:
    1,693
    Trophy Points:
    109
    I think that's what everyone is wondering, good question.
     
    Xspyrit and ReginKarlssonLehner like this.
  2. Do Make Say Think

    Do Make Say Think & Yet & Yet

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    42,192
    Likes Received:
    2,907
    Trophy Points:
    186
    They tried getting people to buy season tickets.

    Nothing is planned except cutting spending.
     
  3. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    With is t looking like a certainty we will be picking somewhere between 32-38, we can start to get a feel for some of the guys who may be available for us there.

    Out if the Q, I don't think anyone will be in that scope, as I can't see any of Lavoie/Poulin/Pelletier being there. If they are, they should be picked.

    Maxim Cajkovic I thjink is going to be available into the mid 2nd. I've seen A LOT of him, he is going to outperform his draft position. He came into a pretty miserable situation this year with regards to the state of Saint John.

    USHL has 2 guys I'm intetested in from watching a couple games in Egor Afanasyev and Bobby Brink.

    Brink was unbelievable at the U-19's. He was dominating the same way that I saw JBD dominating at the same event last last year. High skill level, and a constant motor.

    Afansyev is a huge, rangy, offensive winger who can skate and create room for himself. I can't see this guy getting out of the 1st.

    One guy I feel we have a keen eye on is Massimo Rizzo (for a number of reasons). I wouldn't be surprised if hes on a short list right now. Jack of all trades centre who is a leader at 17.

    Haven't seen enough/any if the OHL or WHL (aside from Lethbridge and Saskatoon) to be able to fairly say anything a about them.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
  4. branch

    branch boomerang my twiggy

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,742
    Likes Received:
    2,080
    Trophy Points:
    156
    I honestly have 0 interest for this draft after knowing already in advance the type of player we are leaving on the table. June 24th will be a day. Good thing it's on a Friday so I can drink myself into oblivion.
     
  5. Hale The Villain

    Hale The Villain Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Messages:
    17,162
    Likes Received:
    1,289
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Have you seen much of Alex Beaucage this year? He's a guy that's looked very intriguing to me in my limited viewings.

    6'2, 192lbs
    28 goals and 58 points in 49 games played
    Has a great wrist shot and good hands
    Looks to have a good hockey IQ

    Has most of the tools we look at in a player, besides strong skating ability.

    Do you think he's a guy we could take a look at in the 2nd?
     
  6. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    He'll be on all NHL teams radars, all draft eligibles on RN and Drummondville will be, they will be playing deep into the playoffs and 1 will be onto the Mem cup.

    His stats are a bit higher than I think they would be on a different team, Abbandonato is helping a lot there. He knows where to be, but isn't great at getting there.

    Personally I'd rather their overaged (barely I believe) Bergeron than Beaucage
     
  7. stempniaksen

    stempniaksen Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,769
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Ottawa
    I still follow the draft because it's typically one of my favourite parts of the season and I truly enjoy junior hockey. That being said, I've kind of made a point to try and not watch some of the higher end guys we'll be missing out on (pretty much all the highly ranked WHL guys) so that it stings less on draft day.
     
    branch likes this.
  8. stempniaksen

    stempniaksen Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,769
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Ottawa
    Any insight into Samuel Bolduc? Wasn't really on my radar until the Top Prospects Game, but he obviously did really well in the off-ice testing segment and he had an okay game as well. He also already has NHL size. I'm wondering if he's a case of "all the tools, but no toolbox" since I haven't really seen him ranked inside the top-50 often (if at all).

    Also, where do you expect Pelletier to go in the draft? He's a guy I really like and someone I hope we can trade up for if we end up shipping guys out at the deadline and can pick up multiple top-60 picks.

    As far as new names to bring up, a couple of guys that have really impressed me are Trevor Zegras and Cam York.

    Zegras seems like the prototypical Sens 1st round pick. Kind of like a better Colin White. The kid is responsible defensively while providing enough offensive flair that he isn't going to be labelled a "future 3C". He's looking like a pick between 10-20 at this point, so at the very least it would mean trading for a 1st round pick, but he just seems to check all the boxes that seem important to the Senators scouting staff.

    Every single year I fall in love with an undersized puck moving defenceman (I thought Aaron Ness was gonna be a top-four guy, so I'm clearly biased here, grain of salt and all, haha) and this year it's Cam York. He was great at the U18's. He's another LHD and is likely to go in the 1st round, so maybe he's not a priority for this team to go out an get. That being said, I truly think he's one of the better OFD in this draft class and he might be another guy worth targetting to move up and get.
     
    SadEugeneOregonDonor likes this.
  9. Qward

    Qward Because! That's why!

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    15,269
    Likes Received:
    928
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Behind you, look out
    Brett Leason is projecting in the late first. Maybe with a dzingel first we could possibly snag him. 6'5 right handed shot.
     
    aragorn likes this.
  10. stempniaksen

    stempniaksen Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,769
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Ottawa
    I've said it before and I'll say it again. I love this kid. I don't care that he's 2 years older than most kids, this guy had a "Mark Stone-esque" development curb and has been nothing short of fantastic all year. He even impressed at the World Juniors, which is what really did it for me honestly. I don't think he falls into the 2nd, but if/when we trade off the UFA's he could be in range for us.
     
  11. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    Haven't seen a single BBA game all season. He never impressed me much last year on that very good team, but is noticeable on the ice with his stature. I can't really say whether or not he'd be a god pick, but he isn't a guy I've heard much about or had any interest this year around the rinks.

    Pelletier is electric. Can't see him making it beyond ~20, I don't think the size is going to scare teams like it did like it did even a few years ago. He was the guy I predicted would have the most points this season for draft eligible guys, and he is lighting it up with McKenna.

    Zegras is 100% going top 10, and York should be in the 15-25 range if I were to hazard a guess, only way we'd be able to get York is with a 1st in a trade for one of our guys, Zegras won't be available for the Sens.
     
    stempniaksen likes this.
  12. operasen

    operasen Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,138
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Spencer Knight. Especially if Anderson is gone
     
    Crosside likes this.
  13. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    Goalies in the 1st round is a waste of a pick

    Since 2007 there has been 1 G selected in the 1st round who has become a starter in the NHL in Vasilevskiy. Everyone else has been a bad pick. Obviously teams agree using 1st's on G's is a waste, only 9 have been chosen in the past 12 drafts.

    Subban
    Irving
    McCallum
    Pickard
    Campbell
    Visentin

    Samsonov
    Oettinger
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2019
    BonkTastic likes this.
  14. Crosside

    Crosside Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2018
    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    23
    Gender:
    Male
    Maybe in the 2 rnd
     
  15. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    G's are so hard to evaluate and project, that's why so many starters in the league today ended up being mid-late round picks in their drafts, a much, MUCH higher ratio than skaters.
     
  16. stempniaksen

    stempniaksen Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    7,769
    Likes Received:
    1,411
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Ottawa
    I'm with BT on this one, as far as staying away from goalies early on. That being said, if we do target one, can it please be from the NCAA/Europe instead of the CHL? The late round CHL goalies that end up "hitting" are few and far between. I'd much rather take a shot on another Daccord instead of another Hollett.

    That might be an overly simplistic view of things, but I've never been impressed with the lower tier CHL goalies who get picked.
     
    BonkTastic likes this.
  17. BonkTastic

    BonkTastic ಠ_ಠ

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    28,737
    Likes Received:
    6,294
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    I'd even argue that the extra development time that later goalie picks get by not being seen as a "marketable prospect" (ie: teams don't promote 4th round picks to sell tickets until they've proven themselves, and as a result don't rush them until they are ready) is a significant part of why they succeed.

    Projecting a goalie at 18 years old, unless they truly are a generational talent, is a fool's errand. Draft them in the mid-late rounds based on potential and circumstances, and hope one of them works out.
     
    BondraTime likes this.
  18. BonkTastic

    BonkTastic ಠ_ಠ

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    28,737
    Likes Received:
    6,294
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    I'm with you 100% here.
     
  19. operasen

    operasen Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,138
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    101

    I hear you, but with no 1st, he could be had in the 2nd or top of the 3rd Round potentially. He's been rising pretty steadily and been lights out for the US team.

    We've got Hogberg and Gustavsson from Europe, and Daccord. Condon seems done. Anderson could be gone and Nilsson could be as well unless we want to pay him. I could see that happening if Anderson is dealt. We need more than 4 in the system.

    For this Draft I'm more a fan of targeting what we need and building from there. Net out in this case. Unless someone is handed to us or we get back into the 1st with a trade.
     
  20. Icelevel

    Icelevel +++--++++--=+

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    18,386
    Likes Received:
    840
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Remember to take all these specific player analyses with a grain of salt.

    BondraTime (and others) was strongly against the tkachuk pick for example.
     
    aragorn likes this.
  21. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    Still am, I highly doubt Tkachuk is going to be the 4th best player from this draft. He's got 7 points in the past 25 games playing all of it with Stone. He's had the most prime minutes of anyone in the draft, by far.

    We are in a rebuild and he's a winger, not the greatest position to rebuild from.

    A few months after and a handful of guys playing makes it much easier to laud a guy playing already.

    Perfectly fine with him here, he's great. I think there are going to be better players coming in. As I said at the time, use our pick for a rebuilding team on a C or D.

    You don't need to take anything with a grain of salt, it's literally my opinion, I'm not giving any rumours out. Whether you put any stock in it means nothing, that's your opinion.

    If you have anything to contribute, please do.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2019
    Mr Hat, branch and Six Assets like this.
  22. Six Assets

    Six Assets Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    9,929
    Likes Received:
    839
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ottawa
    what's the point of this post?
     
    BondraTime and branch like this.
  23. BondraTime

    BondraTime Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    16,165
    Likes Received:
    5,087
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Location:
    East Coast
    He liked the Tkachuk pick and I never, I guess? It's a draft, everyone in the business gets tons of things wrong every year.

    Assuming he thinks it's a conclusion that Tkachuk is better than all the guys not yet in the NHL, 6 months after the draft...

    I'd assume everyone knows that drafting isn't an exact science, nobody needs to be reminded of that. Just a way to belittle what I wrote
     
    Six Assets likes this.
  24. Joeyjoejoe

    Joeyjoejoe Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,995
    Likes Received:
    1,811
    Trophy Points:
    111
    local man suggests to not trust others opinions on a message board, even his own.
     
  25. Caesar Rex

    Caesar Rex Et tu, Dorion

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2015
    Messages:
    7,006
    Likes Received:
    3,311
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Me gusta Tkachuk a lot but it was absolutely the wrong pick.

    Not only do you have to compare him to his draft year but you also have to compare him to the top 5 of this year's draft.
     
  26. aragorn

    aragorn #Boucherout

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    18,429
    Likes Received:
    1,202
    Trophy Points:
    169
    I think we need to analyse players by more than how many pts they have, some players like Tkachuk contribute in so many different ways that increase his value substantially. I think every team in the NHL would love to have a Tkachuk on their team, they do so much to help teams win games than put up points, they are very valuable assets for any team.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"