wankstifier
All glory to the harvest god
- Jun 19, 2018
- 7,724
- 11,142
Hasty generalization + psychologizing + accusing people of arguing in bad faith.
Poisoning the well against objective knowledge, destroying the epistemic playing field of those arguing against your view.
Ditto.
Reasonable question, but slight appeal to authority, rather than providing a declarative answer re: inducing skepticism but not rebuilding factual phenomenon, which is considered bad form.
Strawman.
False dilemma. Probably followed up by a false equivalence, is what I imagine your next step is.
Same fallacy + small present sample size (induction issues).
Welcome to Post modernism, brother.
Someone enrolled in Writing & Rhetoric