Dr Johnny Fever
Eggplant and Teal
I remember when people said that about the Ducks.Buffalo has about 9 dmen I wouldn't mind having
I remember when people said that about the Ducks.Buffalo has about 9 dmen I wouldn't mind having
I feel like we could be good trade partners. So many older guys on their team that they should be all in right now and we are about to come out of a rebuild. If I were them I'd be targeting Silf or Rico for a little depth and both guys are studs in the playoffs. I wouldnt mind a first round pick or decent prospect.We’ve been scouting the Bruins A LOT the past few weeks. I wonder if Miller is the target?
Interesting article in The Athletic suggesting that Charlie Coyle's extension and the upcoming ED might make Tory Krug expendable. He hasn't been re-signed yet.We’ve been scouting the Bruins A LOT the past few weeks. I wonder who’s the target?
Krug is interesting except I'd expect him to get more money than Faulk, is smaller and shoots left. All 3 things I'm not sure fit for the Ducks. Id imagine they're targeting Kase or Terry. I'd be happy with a number if their D coming back.Interesting article in The Athletic suggesting that Charlie Coyle's extension and the upcoming ED might make Tory Krug expendable. He hasn't been re-signed yet.
The article suggested that if they went 7-3-1, they'd want to protect McAvoy, Carlo and Grelczyk, assuming no Krug. Extending Krug means they lose a good young FW or Grelczyk; not unlike where we were 2 years ago. I'd be a lot happier with Krug than Faulk if he's willing to stay here for Faulk money.Krug is interesting except I'd expect him to get more money than Faulk, is smaller and shoots left. All 3 things I'm not sure fit for the Ducks. Id imagine they're targeting Kase or Terry. I'd be happy with a number if their D coming back.
Interesting article in The Athletic suggesting that Charlie Coyle's extension and the upcoming ED might make Tory Krug expendable. He hasn't been re-signed yet.
Deslauriers is surprisingly solid player outside of fightingI'd give a fourth for Deslauriers everyday and twice on Sunday. Remember when Boll was our enforcer and lost every fight?
The fourth line of Deslauriers - Grant - Rowney has been one of the few bright spots this season.
Deslauriers is surprisingly solid player outside of fighting
Alex Galchenyuk, yay or nay?
Bit of a one-trick pony, but would boost the PP a lot. Don't know what PIT is looking to get for him, sounds like they just want him gone when they're healthy...
We’ve been scouting the Bruins A LOT the past few weeks. I wonder who’s the target?
There’s zero chance of moving Rakell or Silfverberg with that untouchables list. I’d think there’s minimal chances of moving them regardless. Kase could certainly be had, but again, not for (yet another) bottom pairing D - we have a plethora of bottom pairing D.The Bruins are loaded defensively and still need a second line RW. They have 7 regular NHL defenseman now with Moore back, and with the likes of Lauzon and Vaak down in providence you could say its 9 as they both could be regulars today and some may argue that Zboril could be as well.
Im sure any of them are available with the exception of Krug,McAvoy Carlo and Chara. krug isn't signed beyond this year, but I don't see the Bruins moving him, He' a big time playoff performer and excels offensively.
I know they've both been scouting each other and the Bruins were interested in Silverberg last year before he signed, but with his contract and the length of it I don't see them being interested in him, after just re-upping Coyle for Silverberg money,but with more years.
As a Bruin fan. I want a deal involving Rakell or Kase, but will the Ducks be willing to trade them, other than them, I really don't see a fit for what the Bruins need. Unless they plan on finding a Krug replacement for next year and are interested Lindoholm, but the again I don't see the Ducks moving him.
There’s zero chance of moving Rakell or Silfverberg with that untouchables list. I’d think there’s minimal chances of moving them regardless. Kase could certainly be had, but again, not for (yet another) bottom pairing D - we have a plethora of bottom pairing D.
He is a UFA to be we shouldn't be trading for him.
I agree. So maybe it is Kase the Bruins are looking at.
Who the ducks would want in return off the Bruins current roster is intriguing as I'm sure the Bruins aren't willing to deal a significant piece as they are looking at making another Cup run.
Perhaps a Bjork or a Heinen .
I know, I was assuming that this would be a "price is right" type scenario -- rumor is that they just want him gone...
I think this right here is the problem between the two teams. I don't think Anaheim will be commencing a fire sale of any sort, so a futures deal doesn't really make sense. Old Bob has a history of preferring "hockey trades"...
EDIT: Also, if the NJ situation ends up in a fire sale, could we somehow grab Vatanen from there?
Bit of a one-trick pony, but would boost the PP a lot.
Im sure any of them are available with the exception of Krug,McAvoy Carlo and Chara. I want a deal involving Rakell or Kase, but will the Ducks be willing to trade them, other than them, I really don't see a fit for what the Bruins need. Unless they plan on finding a Krug replacement for next year and are interested Lindoholm, but the again I don't see the Ducks moving him.
Perhaps a Bjork or a Heinen .
That won't happen until Bob decides he can't re-sign him.If the ducks trade Lindholm I'm out
Funny, he had plenty of years and $$ for Fowler.That won't happen until Bob decides he can't re-sign him.
Funny, he had plenty of years and $$ for Fowler.
Highly doubt that. Also, Sprong.
Rakell/Lindholm for McAvoy. Kase for Debrusk/Carlo.
Maybe as secondary pieces. How come Björk hasn't made the NHL team yet?