Looking forward to seeing if he plays with more confidence after potting his first NHL goal.
Yams got his first yesterday not Bouchie
I was very impressed with him last night. He is very calm with the puck, seems unfazed by NHL pressure. Already seeing him make moves and get himself out of trouble and make passes for good chances.
He barely played and was on for two goals against.
I think he looks pretty good when the puck is on his stick, but its not on his stick enough.
I don't think he looks very good when he's defending.
With Yawney, he is only going to get better. Good assistant coach since Huddy for the D.He barely played and was on for two goals against.
I think he looks pretty good when the puck is on his stick, but its not on his stick enough.
I don't think he looks very good when he's defending.
He was indeed on the ice for 2 goals but he was not the primary reason those goals were scored.
One of the shortcomings with plus/minus stats.
Bouchard is going to make mistakes and be on the ice when goals against are scored....there is no doubt about that.
The real problem is when the vets on the ice to support him make the primary mistakes.
He needs to be properly supported. If he is then IMO he will be just fine.
He absolutely was the primary reason the first goal was scored against us. He was completely lost.
Rest of the game he was at least good and was not responsible for the other goal against.
He has earned all 9 games easily. He already is a decent #6 nhl defender with massive upside.
Im torn. Think he will be fine if he stays or goes back down. Sucks he cant go to the Ahl. Certainly is pro ready.
Meanwhile, Boqvist has 0 goals and 5 assists in 8 games in the OHL, while Dobson has 7 points in 9 games in the QMJHL. For reference, Bouchard put up 87 points in 67 gp, 1.3 points/game, in the OHL last year.
Quinton Hughes has also been held pointless in his first NCAA game.
Bouchard looking like a steal at 10.
I wouldn't count out Dobson and Hughes yet. As many know I wasn't a big fan of Boqvist last year. But the other two I believe will be right there with Bouchard. Would have liked to get all of them along with Zadina. It's to bad we didn't have 4 top 10 picks!
Disagree.
If you watch the sequence just before the goal it was JJ that threw the puck softly into the middle of the ice which was what gave the Bruins the grade A chance in the first place. That goal was primarily due to JJ's poor decision with the puck. The correct play was to dump it out along the boards.
Now IMO Bouchard looked a little lost once that sequence started and Boston had the puck on their stick...things happened very quickly and an immediate read was necessary. I have seen vet Dmen make that same mistake though.
I think the game (obviously) just needs to slow down for him (and it will) but by my eye he was not the cause of that goal.
Turn overs and giveaways happen ALL the time in the Nhl. No offense but your assessment is geared to be apologetic towards Bouchard and nothing else. The whole point of the role of a defensemen is to be in position to defend... Not to say JK was free and clear of blame, just that Bouchard was free and clear of anything resembling defensive coverage and thats on him primarily.
Bouchard was lost. Not even on the right side of the ice and it was his poor positioning that gave up a high end scoring chance that most nhlers would bury.
Let's not get lost in the forest for staring at one tree. Bouchard has been great overall and as I keep repeating im fine if they keep him or send him down.
You are missing the point. The point is the Bouchard was NOT the primary reason for the goal. The bad play by JJ was the primary reason for the goal. Its not apologetic to Bouchard...its just a recognition of what actually happened on the play in question.
As I said...Bouchard made a mistake too but that was in response to JJ's major error and mistakes are more likely to happen in response to a major turnover.
Watch the play again.
Bouchard is a defensive work in progress. I dont think anybody is arguing that but lets not saddle him with primary errors that weren't his doing.
To each thier own but... If Bouchard wasn't lost that doesn't go in. Its his job to be in position. Turn overs happen ALL the time. Its not something that should surprise a defender... Or anyone. Its something everyone is constantly aware of. Every game in multitudes even the best players in the world making them.
If JK turned the puck over and he was covering for a defender, aka the last guy back, yes it would be his fualt.
The bottom line here is that you cant just gloss over JJ's mistake by saying it happens all the time. The point is that it was JJ who committed the primary error...not Bouchard.
So your saying if Bouchard forgot to tie a safety line to something to anchor JK being repelled down a cliff and JK lost his grip on line and fell to his death it would be his own dang fualt...
Its Bouchards responsibity to be there, in position to protect the box. He is the primary person responsible. Imo, to each thier own. If Bouchard was in place pressuring the shooter it hypothetically could be on Talbot more than JK... Purely hypothetical in that situation of course.
There was no reason for Bouchard to be out of position there. Failing to clear the zone sucks but its part of the game.
No...I am saying that Bouchard did make a mistake BUT the primary mistake was made by JJ.
You know...the mistake you are trying to gloss over by suggesting that mistakes happen. Then after glossing over the primary mistake (the most critical mistake) you focus on a secondary mistake made by Bouchard.
Bouchard made that mistake because (after JJ's mistake) now he is reacting to an extreme situation.
Here is the deal...JJ wasn't in an extreme situation when he made the primary mistake. Thats the difference here.
JJ's error created an extreme situation. Thats why it is considered a primary error.
Thats also why Bouchards secondary mistake was much more understandable and justifiable than JJ's.