what's the over/under on periods that backes remains at center? i'm setting it at 4.[/
DeLeTe
what's the over/under on periods that backes remains at center? i'm setting it at 4.[/
Bang on observationThey scored 5 goals with their own goalie pulled, i.e. 6 on 5.
They scored 17 goals when the other team pulled their goalie, i.e. 5 on 6. (More if you count 4v6 and other odd number situations.
NHL.com - Stats
FWIW, I thought Backes played well today and I like that line. Two kids flying around being creative and Backes parked in front setting screens.
to me, he's very clearly the best option at 3C and the roster makes so much more sense
with him there. gives bjork top 9 minutes too, and the line of demarcation between the
top 9 and the 4th line is pretty clear.
Next game, I would like to see:
Marchand -- Bergeron -- Pastrnak
DeBrusk -- Krejci -- Bjork
Heinen -- Backes -- Donato
Wagner -- Kuraly -- Acciari
Bjork has been flying since coming into the lineup. Lets see what he can do with a guy like DeBrusk. Donato should get a 10-15 game look, but if he doesn't start producing then send him to Providence. Call up Cehlarik and reassess the lines. The production from lines 2 and 3 have been embarrassing. JDB and Bjork are looking good, but the rest have been mediocre at best.
The bottom 6 has been a major disappointment thus far, actually the 2nd-4th line has been a disappointment.
Krejci needs to get going here.
10 goals-3 games
Bergeron 4, Pasta 3, Chara, Donato, Wagner
Donato's goal was on the PP with the 1st line, Wagner scored assisted by Marshy and Pasta, same as Chara.
There's has been zero offence created by anyone outside/not including the 1st line.
I agree! Bjork's speed/game compliments DeBrusk Speed/game. I actually think Heinen(playmaker)/Donato(shooter) would work better together. The only problem with that is our 3rd line would be slower than it already is lol.
I think if they had any other options Krejci might already be on the third line.I watched the first game and I thought DeBrusk and Heinen were both pretty good, despite the lack of offense.
Lineup gets changed, Donato in for Heinen.
Next couple of games, DeBrusk and Donato look pretty good, despite the lack of offense.
I am not against the idea of trying Bjork there in place of Donato and agree with the idea that Donato might be a good fit with Heinen.
However, if Bjork doesn’t work there, but he and DeBrusk look pretty good, at what point do you look at the other member of that line and ask what he’s doing to make the Top 6 better? I like Krejci, but the B’s always seem to be looking for wings to work with him. In my mind, a Top 2 center that is the highest paid player on the team needs to be making other guys better...and not the other way around.
If Bjork doesn’t result in better production for that line, you put one of the young wings with 63 and 37, and try Pasta with 74 and 46. If that doesn’t work, maybe it’s time to look at acquiring a better Top 6 center than Krejci?
This is what I’d do too. The second line had a really good shift in the offensive zone in the first period last game, but didn’t do too much else. Bjork was producing in the top 6 last year before injuries and has a better all around game then Donato right now so I’d like to see him improve that line. I thought the bottom 6 was pretty good last game.Next game, I would like to see:
Marchand -- Bergeron -- Pastrnak
DeBrusk -- Krejci -- Bjork
Heinen -- Backes -- Donato
Wagner -- Kuraly -- Acciari
Bjork has been flying since coming into the lineup. Lets see what he can do with a guy like DeBrusk. Donato should get a 10-15 game look, but if he doesn't start producing then send him to Providence. Call up Cehlarik and reassess the lines. The production from lines 2 and 3 have been embarrassing. JDB and Bjork are looking good, but the rest have been mediocre at best.
I don't know if this was posted or if there's a better thread for it, but I suppose it's relevant here:
I watched the first game and I thought DeBrusk and Heinen were both pretty good, despite the lack of offense.
Lineup gets changed, Donato in for Heinen.
Next couple of games, DeBrusk and Donato look pretty good, despite the lack of offense.
I am not against the idea of trying Bjork there in place of Donato and agree with the idea that Donato might be a good fit with Heinen.
However, if Bjork doesn’t work there, but he and DeBrusk look pretty good, at what point do you look at the other member of that line and ask what he’s doing to make the Top 6 better? I like Krejci, but the B’s always seem to be looking for wings to work with him. In my mind, a Top 2 center that is the highest paid player on the team needs to be making other guys better...and not the other way around.
If Bjork doesn’t result in better production for that line, you put one of the young wings with 63 and 37, and try Pasta with 74 and 46. If that doesn’t work, maybe it’s time to look at acquiring a better Top 6 center than Krejci?
He proved he's a superstar no need to take risks...now what were the bruins thinking picking up a ready to retire/worried for his health Nash at the deadline?
And why do some fans still want to sign with the bruins?
I agree! Bjork's speed/game compliments DeBrusk Speed/game. I actually think Heinen(playmaker)/Donato(shooter) would work better together. The only problem with that is our 3rd line would be slower than it already is lol.
He proved he's a superstar no need to take risks...now what were the bruins thinking picking up a ready to retire/worried for his health Nash at the deadline?
And why do some fans still want to sign with the bruins?
I don't know if this was posted or if there's a better thread for it, but I suppose it's relevant here:
You're still on this Nash stuff? One would think that he only seriously started to consider retirement (and seems to be going towards it) because of the concussion he got while playing for Boston. You acting like he was like this before coming here is funny.
Everyone knows Rick Nash wasn't himself for a number of years. That's no secrete. Please note the the following article from 2013. Many more like this out there in googleland. Bruins were risking on a broken player. And like you said, yes I'm acting like this before he came to Boston.
Will Concussions Make Rick Nash The Next Eric Lindros?
Every time you post I'm on the edge of my seat.
False
He proved he's a superstar no need to take risks...now what were the bruins thinking picking up a ready to retire/worried for his health Nash at the deadline?
And why do some fans still want to sign with the bruins?
If a team acquired Bergeron today, would they be risking on a broken player? Because he has a history of concussions, one as recently as 2013, the same year as this article was written about Rick Nash. (and Bergeron's 4th, as oppose to Nash's 3rd).
We get it, you didn't like that trade. Well it's done, time to get over it. You'll use anything you can find to continue to hammer the point home you thought it was a bad deal.
Every time you post I'm on the edge of my seat.