This is so right. Marchand by himself is Boston and maybe NHL mose entertaining player, extremely singular player... on the ice, watching him will entertain all game watcher. On tv we miss alot of Brad entertainement show. He can be likable by moves, passes, shot, hockey play. He can be despite being a energy (polite way) player, he is a vocal player, his mouth never stops... he is hated with some bordeling action... he is emotion... I just like that player and accepte his antics.. he is one of his own. I don’t agree with evertything he does... but it comes with the guy.I was watching Marchand last night and there is no one really ever like him. Yvan Cournoyer was similarly skilled but was Lady Bynge game.
The 4 seats in back of me are owned by a ticket agency so we often get out of towners and the most comments are mostly about Marchand and it usually ends up a combination of disdain and awe.
Marchand is going to go down as a comparison player for generations.
I’ve told non hockey friends to just watch him for entertainment and they are never disappointed
Orr
Neely
Marchand
Three unique players that there are few comparable players when I’ve watched a game
Last night he loses a glove and ends up getting a slashing minor penalty for chopping the opponent in the wrist - that’s Marchand
Switch Backes and Wagner.
How do you know that he's asking for guaranteed minutes or would if he signed here???
Assumption ....since he was scratched a few game with the Sabres..
Expected, tough i think he should let Bergy alone for a game or 2.
Once Debrusk is up to speed, Nords takes Wagner spot. I like it but it all comes down to how Heinen performs.
smfh don't do this Butch
Yes Cassidy just keep beating a dead horse
Nordstrom on the 2nd line is a joke
Its hilarious Stempniak is still listed
Is he getting paid to help with practice
Nordstrom is just a place holder on the 2nd line for the weekend games
DeBrusk will be the LW2 or RW2 next week assuming no setbacks
I appreciate the well thought out response. I agree a move doesn't need to be made right this second, but I'll also disagree that none of the young D have forced the B's hand either, as Vaak showed early on that he deserves to be with the big club, and having 4 top 4 LD ahead of him is the only reason he didn't start the season in Boston.Just because some of these guys CAN play NHL minutes doesn't mean they HAVE TO right now. None of the young D force the Bruins hand like McAvoy or Carlo have in the past.
Vaak will need some more time in Providence once his head is working again. Next year I suspect he will be pushing for a job, but no rush.
Lauzon WAS FINE in his call up, but by no means did he force his way onto the roster. Looks like he COULD be a nice 2nd pairing guy someday, and could play bottom pairing today, or harder minutes in the AHL. Needs to improve his puck moving.
And don't sleep on Zboril.
For next season, you absolutely COULD maintain the status quo and let Vaak, Zboril and Lauzon marinate another year. And when people get injured, and they will, ease them in instead of Kampfer's taking the minutes.
Then you are looking at maybe Chara retiring. And the expansion draft. And Krug being a UFA. And Kevan Miller's UFA status making you look at moving a LD to RD.
Suddenly, the D group looks much less deep, or at least potentially so. I do think that it's in the teams best interest to move one of the LD for forward, with Krug, Gryz or Vaak being the guys that can get the most in return. But there is no pressing rush. From there its just finding out what deals are out there and keeping in mind the expansion draft and the cap. Vaak is exempt if I understand correctly, which would probably mean I would be looking to not deal him.
Coming out of the expansion draft with Vaak, Krug or Gryz, McAvoy and Carlo would be pretty sweet.
So, to me, it really comes down to finding the right deal for Gryz or Krug. Krug is better. Gryz is cheaper and will remain cheaper due to RFA status and the fact that his (very valuable) skill set just doesn't cost as much as Krug's points. Who you move depends on what is offered.
I don't see why Sweeney wouldn't have these thoughts going through his mind, he saw our offensive struggles in last year's playoffs and saw that struggle continue this season. Patrick Berglund could absolutely be the solution, I would definitely be willing to give him a shot, but until that happens I think there is still plenty of space of debating other options.I doubt Don Sweeney is echoing this line of thought. Jake DeBrusk has missed some time and will be back soon hopefully and of course Bergeron is just about ready as well. Now it's up to Cassidy to rework his lines and see what they have and how they work. Once everyone is back and there's a few games to make assessments with needs, then they can decide to make moves etc.
And I've seen enough of Steven Kapfer this season as a regular.
Plus the more I think about it, Patrik Berglund could be an x factor option that would only cost them salary without giving up assets. And he is likely going to be very motivated for his next deal
I don't see why Sweeney wouldn't have these thoughts going through his mind, he saw our offensive struggles in last year's playoffs and saw that struggle continue this season. Patrick Berglund could absolutely be the solution, I would definitely be willing to give him a shot, but until that happens I think there is still plenty of space of debating other options.
Debrusl Krejci Pasta experiment
Not optimistic as it has not clicked in the past
63-46-88 is on fire. don't fix what ain't broke. I'd have gone with 43-37-42 for the 2nd line.Which part do you object to the most?
Breaking up the top line?
Breaking up 63-46-88?
Personally, I would prefer a proven Top 6 wing to slide into the Top 6, which would move Heinen down to line 3, but right now he might be the best option, especially until 74 is back.
Pasta and Marchand seem to be the pair that shouldn't be broken up.63-46-88 is on fire. don't fix what ain't broke. I'd have gone with 43-37-42 for the 2nd line.