jkutswings
hot piss hockey
- Jul 10, 2014
- 10,958
- 8,710
Sports radio hosts are paid to be entertainers, not professors. And whether I agree with anything he says or not, he has the ratings to prove he's good at his job.Dude is a f'in blowhard.
Sports radio hosts are paid to be entertainers, not professors. And whether I agree with anything he says or not, he has the ratings to prove he's good at his job.Dude is a f'in blowhard.
I like some elements of his game, and he definitely has an interesting ceiling. But I think he's more likely to bust than the players I listed, and I think his skill set would be best utilized alongside a pure sniper, which Detroit doesn't have.Not a Kirby Dach fan I take it?
And nobody ever suggested that Jeff Blashill should have anything to do with not trying to win.
Holland should bench the players, and the coaches should be furious, because they're hard-wired to win every game, just like the players themselves. But management should care less about wins in March and April than wins in June. If anything, it would further strengthen the locker room, since it would be Everybody vs Holland.
I don't care. The players can take a long walk off a short pier, because absolutely NOTHING that happens in the final games of the regular season will matter when next October rolls around. It's a brand new year, and there's no such thing as carryover momentum.You CANT DO IT THAT WAY. You can’t bench healthy players. The NHLPA would throw a fit, the owners would throw a fit, basically everyone but the people who want the team to tank for a draft pick would be pissed.
And **** no it wouldn’t strengthen the locker room. This isn’t Major League. You’d have guys like Larkin and Bertuzzi who kill themselves all year but “oh, nothing you do matters, Dylan, too bad”.
You also wouldn’t be granted emergency call ups if you healthy scratch players. So... by sitting 3 healthy players and a goalie, you’re basically making it to where you’re either skating down a man or you are ****ed to high hell if you have an injury in game. That’s not a realistic thing a team would do. That’s insane.
Yeah, I don't understand why these losers are winning meaningless games. Take the L and try to better your odds at fixing the team going forward.
Yeah, professional hockey players who get paid millions of dollars and couldn't give enough of a shit to win when it actually mattered.Oh you’re so edgy dude. How cool are you talking **** about professional hockey players playing winning hockey
Yeah, professional hockey players who get paid millions of dollars and couldn't give enough of a **** to win when it actually mattered.
Lottery results w/ team's chance of winning that pick and their reverse seeding:
2016
1st: Leafs, 20% (last)
2nd: Winnipeg, 7.8% (6th last)
3rd: Columbus, 9.8% (4th last)
2017
1st: New Jersey - 8.5% (5th last)
2nd: Philadelphia - 2.5% (13th last)
3rd: Dallas - 6.4% (8th last)
2018
1st: Buffalo, 18% (last)
2nd: Carolina, 3.3% (11th last)
3rd: Montreal, 9.7% (4th last).
Since the new lottery system came into action, the top 3 teams have never really won the top picks. The last team has won the first pick a couple of times but it's mostly other teams jumping. This is an artifact of how close the odds actually are for all these teams - all within a few percentage points of each other. People here really need to realise that while it sucks that our odds are going down a bit ,the difference isn't nearly as big as you all think. Absolute worst case, 3 teams that are all below us win and we end with the 8th overall pick. Unlikely but that's the only case in whcih we get sorta screwed, cause picks 3-7 are all fantastic, as I've discussed on here before.
I don't care. The players can take a long walk off a short pier, because absolutely NOTHING that happens in the final games of the regular season will matter when next October rolls around. It's a brand new year, and there's no such thing as carryover momentum.
The fate of the 2019-20 Red Wings will be more dependent on summer workouts, free agent signings, and half a dozen other factors than whether they "finish well" right now. It's the fake news of the sporting world. And after three quarters of a horrendous season, the payoff of a phenomenal draft pick was within reach...and now they're doing their best to flush that away, so all those other losses just got a whole lot closer to being pointless.
Either be good at being good, or be good at being bad. But this nonsense is just being bad at being bad, which is a waste of time.
Now I kinda hope we win all remaining games and lose the lottery as badly as possible. They can have what they want, as they're clearly good enough to contend without any more talent.
If we win out and lose the lottery, we won't be drafting 7th.Yeah, no one has ever drafted a talented player at #7 or anything.
Don't waste your time, he's obviously not watching the games.Look at the roster that's winning and the roster that lost. Can you spot a difference?
If we win out and lose the lottery, we won't be drafting 7th.
If things go just poorly enough, we can draft 11th and get our future superstar.
Not that we need one, of course.
Everyone wants to keep winning and dropping down the standings and magically land a star player as good as the top 3 at 7-8-9-10If we win out and lose the lottery, we won't be drafting 7th.
If things go just poorly enough, we can draft 11th and get our future superstar.
Not that we need one, of course. But somebody has to drive the parade car.
Now I kinda hope we win all remaining games and lose the lottery as badly as possible. They can have what they want, as they're clearly good enough to contend without any more talent.
Everyone wants to keep winning and dropping down the standings and magically land a star player as good as the top 3 at 7-8-9-10
We can still go way down and throw this season down the toilet after being so close to the bottom for 72 games
What a wonderful season