Street Hawk
Registered User
My bad a prosecutor looked over the evidence of the claimed, injuries, incidents and how good the witnesses were and the texts and decided not to do anything or file charges over six weeks of looking over stuff.
They better have crazy evidence. Cause the giants kicker got 1 game for a whole lot of police reports. So this has to be a different incident that people don't know about, if it is Dv.
Chances are, it's 4 games for weed plus 2 games were conduct detrimental to the league. That I would not argue and the right thing was done
NFL doesn't operate by the same standards as the legal system and courts. If the prosecutors don't feel that they have enough evidence to secure a conviction, then they are not going to pursue a court case.
NFL operates more along the lines of civll cases, where the burden of proof isn't beyond a shadow of doubt, but more of it's more probable than not.
I'm sure that there are NFL players who hate this clause in the CBA, but I doubt that any more than 10% are willing to give up something or suffer a labour stoppage to remove this power from the NFL. Outside of maybe giving the power to someone elected by the NFLPA and NFL together. Majority of players don't get into trouble, so that's not something they want to lose money over. They'd rather fight to get more money given how short their careers are. Doubt they care too much if a couple of teammates get into legal trouble.