Prospect Info: 2017 CFHF Prospect Rankings: #10

[FlamerForLife]

1. Mark Jankowski (50.00%)
2. Tyler Parsons (57.50%)
3. Rasmus Andersson (47.73%)
4. Juuso Valimaki (68.75%)
5. Oliver Kylington (34.38%:tiebreaker:52.38%)
6. Jon Gillies (60.61%)
7. Adam Fox (53.49%)
8. Dillon Dube (47.37%)
9. Andrew Mangiapane (35.00%:tiebreaker:44.74%)

Run-off rules (copied from Angelsmith's thread last year):
• If first and second place are separated by a number of votes less than or equal to the number of votes for third place, a run-off vote will take place.
• If first and third are separated by a number of votes less than the number of all other votes, a three-way run-off vote will take place.
• Rules are subject to change due to common sense at all times.

Click to read more...

 

[Lunatik]

Foo, whenever the poll gets finished

 

[FlamerForLife]

Klimchuk

 

[Lunatik]

Klimchuk

I'm a big Klimmer fan, but IMO there is no way he is ahead of Shinkaruk. Shink had a really underrated season this past year.

 

[InfinityIggy]

Went Kulak this time. Then I am thinking Klimchuk, then Foo.

 

[Calgareee]

Kulak for me. Between him, Klimmer and Rittich at this point. Went with Kulak because I expect him to spend most of the season with the big club.

Finding Foo really hard to place just because I've only seen some grainy highlight reals and some quick videos at prospect camp.

 

[Mobiandi]

TSpoon again. Jack of all trades, master of none. But I think he's likely to carve out a more successful career than Kulak

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

Foo. You will not Foo me twice.

 

[FlamerForLife]

I'm a big Klimmer fan, but IMO there is no way he is ahead of Shinkaruk. Shink had a really underrated season this past year.

Shink is definitely more skilled, but I just think Klimchuk has a better shot at making it to the NHL and he can play a bottom 6 role, whereas I'm not sure if Shink can play in a bottom 6 role.

 

[Lunatik]

Shink is definitely more skilled, but I just think Klimchuk has a better shot at making it to the NHL and he can play a bottom 6 role, whereas I'm not sure if Shink can play in a bottom 6 role.

Top/Bottom 6 in the NHL is more or less dead. It's top 9 and 4th line now and IMO both are top 9 or bust.

 

[Tkachuk Norris]

Kulak. Then Foo. Then Rittich. Then our talent level falls off a cliff IMO.

 

[InfinityIggy]

Top/Bottom 6 in the NHL is more or less dead. It's top 9 and 4th line now and IMO both are top 9 or bust.

Even so, I would still have Klimchuk ahead. Klimchuk could be a good 4th line player. Shinkaruk cannot in my opinion.

 

[FlamerForLife]

Top/Bottom 6 in the NHL is more or less dead. It's top 9 and 4th line now and IMO both are top 9 or bust.

Fair enough, I think Klimchuk could play 4th line too, they're close though imo.

 

[Flames Fanatic]

Kulak. Then Foo. Then Rittich. Then our talent level falls off a cliff IMO.

Personally I feel like we may have gone to the next "tier" after Dube, as I don't personally see a huge difference between Klimchuk and Mangiapane. Mangiapane may have a higher ceiling, but I think Klimchuk may be a safer bet.

I really do like Mangiapane though. I think he proved a lot by scoring 41 points in 66 games last year in his first pro season.

 

[CraigsList]

Kulak.

 

[FlamerForLife]

According to the rules Klimchuk should be in the run-off along with Kulak & Foo. So should I include him in it or just leave it between the 2 highest?

 

[Mr Snrub]

According to the rules Klimchuk should be in the run-off along with Kulak & Foo. So should I include him in it or just leave it between the 2 highest?

You may as well, gives me an excuse to vote for him again anyway