PlusMinusZero
Registered User
Leading One's main input doesn't come from coaching but from creating a culture in which for example delayed starts from behind the goal are part of the accepted narrative of game. Delayed stop and go control plays cease to be supernatural events which terrify the simple people. Instead of fear they create common understanding of the game which includes far more than just individuals. A deep blue sea to dive into. To my knowledge Leading One is the only source for this approach in the whole ice hockey world. If that isn't a merit for the Leading Analyst, what is?
I would be interested to hear from playbooks of Tortorella and Bednar. Perhaps even from themselves. Who is gonna ask them to draw their tactical understanding on a flip chart? The culture isn't there.
Dear lord100% pure comedy gold right here,funny guy you are.
And Petteri Sihvonen is a leading one!!?The man is a joke to everyone who knows even the basics of hockey.And lost his coaching job because he really didnt have any clue how to coach and his understanding of the game is in kindergarten level.So not sure his "professional(and when we speak of Sihvonen this term is really loose)" take on anything hockey related should be taken seriously.