Goulet17
Registered User
- May 22, 2003
- 7,940
- 3,784
I think you can present a strong argument that Rantanen is too low based on what he has objectively accomplished to this point.
Shift this draft in a few years and things will look differently. IMO it always undervalues the Dmen that require a higher development cycle.Depends what you go for in a redraft. Best player or what the team in that draft position need. Leafs needs a defenceman just as bad as they would have needed a winger without Marner. Anyway its close, but if you go after highest value even considering how good Marner is I would guess Provorov and Werenski have higher value in the league because of position.
Provorov and Werenski would probably have more trade value league wide due to posistion but i just feel that because of how well Marner was able to drive his own line (especially when Matthews was out with an injury) and how well he has developed thus far as a leaf i just feel that he is just to valuable to that organization just to move on from him.Depends what you go for in a redraft. Best player or what the team in that draft position need. Leafs needs a defenceman just as bad as they would have needed a winger without Marner. Anyway its close, but if you go after highest value even considering how good Marner is I would guess Provorov and Werenski have higher value in the league because of position.
I'd like to see him repeat it next year. Pluss playing with Mac puts a little bit of handicap on you IMO.I think you can present a strong argument that Rantanen is too low based on what he has objectively accomplished to this point.
In the scenario where say the leafs took Provorov at 4, this how i could see the top 10 going down.Having Marner over Werenski I understand but I think you need Provorov at 4. I guess I could argue Rantanen to go higher but the other guys have strong cases as well. Insane top 10
I'd like to see him repeat it next year. Pluss playing with Mac puts a little bit of handicap on you IMO.
of course Chiarelli trades a 1st for a bust in one of the deepest drafts of all time.
Incredible draft.
From a Finnish point of view this draft looked really bad for us. It looked like there is no one else besides Rantanen. Looks a very good group now with Rantanen and Aho leading the way, with Nutivaara and possibly Niku coming next. 1st and 2nd round picks and two 7th rounders. Lol.
And you can't forget Saarela, Mikkola and Hintz. They have potential to be an NHL players. 13 Finnish players were selected in 2015. If 7 of them makes it full-time, I think that is excellent from a group which was supposed to be weak. Even if some of them only get a few games, it is still good, but not great.
Hes close (top 35 for sure) but i just feel the players i have above him just have more upside for me personally.Tbf he's also around 3 years older than the majority of the 2015 draft, so there could be a case made for potential of other prospects vs where a much older player is right now.
I'd still have him in the top 30 in a redraft right now though.
Yeah the guys already a star in this league! Him and Pettersson are gonna be dynamite together.Was disappointed with the Boeser pick initially... Thought we just picked up a 3rd line winger who would take 4 years to get to nhl at least. One of my worst draft blunders
10)/COL Conner
10)/COL Conner
8)/CBJ Conner
What? I am sorry but have you seen what the top 10 in this draft looks like?I'm sorry but Carlo should be in the top 10 as well. The guys a horse back there shutting stars down.
6 foot 5 dman that can shut down auston Mathews I'll take anytime anyday anyplace.What? I am sorry but have you seen what the top 10 in this draft looks like?
He is a good player....He doesn't sniff the top 10 of this draft. Not sure what Matthews has to do with it though.6 foot 5 dman that can shut down auston Mathews I'll take anytime anyday anyplace.
I believe he's top ten material he's has good as connor barzal in terms of what he brings. You just can find horses that play 20 plus at 21 yrs old and shut first lines out these days. Hard to find ask the leafs if they need Carlo for example.He is a good player....He doesn't sniff the top 10 of this draft. Not sure what Matthews has to do with it though.