I agree with the need to find and develop lower-round gems. But irrespective of scouting budget, the raw probabilities of drafting even NHL regulars outside the 1st simply pale in comparison to how often a top 5 draft pick is a hit.
To attempt to illustrate this point, top 5 draft picks from 2006-2010
2006:
E. Johnson
J. Staal
J Toews
N. Backstrom
P. Kessel
2007:
P. Kane
J. Van Reimsdyk
K. Turris
T. Hickey
K. Alzner
2008:
S. Stamkos
D. Doughty
Z. Bogosian
A. Pietrangelo
L. Schenn
2009:
J. Tavares
V. Hedman
M. Duchene
E. Kane
B. Schenn
2010:
T. Hall
T. Seguin
E. Gudbrandson
R. Johansen
N. Niedereitter
Pretty much everyone on this list is an NHL regular, and almost all of the forwards have been impact players. You have to pretty much go back to Nikolay Zherdev in 2003 to find a top 5 drafted forward who didn't last long in the league, but there was the KHL factor with him and even then he did have a 60 point season for the Blue Jackets.
To attempt to illustrate this point, top 5 draft picks from 2006-2010
2006:
E. Johnson
J. Staal
J Toews
N. Backstrom
P. Kessel
2007:
P. Kane
J. Van Reimsdyk
K. Turris
T. Hickey
K. Alzner
2008:
S. Stamkos
D. Doughty
Z. Bogosian
A. Pietrangelo
L. Schenn
2009:
J. Tavares
V. Hedman
M. Duchene
E. Kane
B. Schenn
2010:
T. Hall
T. Seguin
E. Gudbrandson
R. Johansen
N. Niedereitter
Pretty much everyone on this list is an NHL regular, and almost all of the forwards have been impact players. You have to pretty much go back to Nikolay Zherdev in 2003 to find a top 5 drafted forward who didn't last long in the league, but there was the KHL factor with him and even then he did have a 60 point season for the Blue Jackets.
My other point would be still doesn't guarantee a cup, or even the playoffs. Ain't that right Edmonton?
Edmonton has dysfunctional coaching and management and lacked a solid veteran core to surround their young talent. A total non sequitur.
My other point would be still doesn't guarantee a cup, or even the playoffs. Ain't that right Edmonton?
Of those players, Tavares, Stamkos, Seguin, Duchene, Doughty, Pietrangelo, Toews, Johansson, Hall and P Kane are "franchise savior"-level players. Maybe Alzner, E Kane and Kessel go on that list too. And a couple (Hickey, L Schenn, Johnson) aren't any good.
10-13 of the 25. Even this is a coin flip.
They're all really good, but if we draft 3rd-5th this year and the guy grows into a JVR by 2016-2017, that'll be nice but nothing more. JVR would be our best scoring winger, but not a franchise-changer. The Tavares / Stamkos / Toews list is a list of franchise-changers.You don't count Backstrom, JVR, and Hedman as star players or at least stars in the making? That bumps it up to 15-16 (60%)
I did also make the specific point of focusing on the forwards rather than the defensemen (as defensemen take longer to develop). Pretty much the only forward on that list who's still unproven is Nino, but he was mishandled by the Isles and he's looked decent on the Wild.
60% is a heck of a lot better than expecting to draft a star player outside the Top 10 much less drafting an NHL regular outside of Round 1.
Maloney also wouldn't want to say he is open to trading Vermette
My other point would be still doesn't guarantee a cup, or even the playoffs. Ain't that right Edmonton?
Until this team is ready to spend a little more it will be tough to build a consistent contender through high draft picks.
Please stop using this organization as an example of anything beyond totally incompetent management. They're in purgatory with that many high picks for a reason. It's the TGO/Barnett show for them.
And you can complain about not spending enough all you want. Fact is, teams in our division (and this league) routinely churn out more homegrown talent than the Coyotes do. And they use this talent not only do flesh out rosters under budgets, but they also use it to acquire players in trade. The Kings alone have seven homegrown forwards on their roster and have traded guys like Wayne Simmonds and Brayden Schenn.
It's not as simple as cramming money into the GM machine. UFAs are the worst deals out there.
You have to spend a little on secondary players to compliment a young core, but the fact of the matter is that that's is a far more sustainable and ultimately less expensive model to success than primarily relying on UFA signings to compete. The primary reason why the Kings were able to trade for (not sign, trade) Carter and Richards was because they were able to draft blue-chippers like Simmonds and Brayden Schenn and then flip em for pieces to compliments Doughty and Kopitar.
We need more payroll, obviously. But that's not mutually exclusive with obtaining potential stars w/ high draft picks.
Simmonds last season with the Kings he put up 30 pts in 80 games, and Schenn was in the AHL when he was traded, a top prospect no doubt, but not with the big club none-the-less. Kings also gave up a second round pick.
What's my point? Coyotes have that type of talent to trade.
The salary the Kings acquired with Richards is more than anyone is making with the Yotes, and that is the biggest reason Arizona can't and will not make a trade for a player of Richards caliber.