Okay, lets forget size, Petan, Dauphin, Poirier and Subban, happy now ? Boys, I know these guys are skilled, but we need to size and toughen up. One of these guys ( not Subban ) , fine, but more than one, no thanks. Remember, balance.
If I'm Florida at #2 I'm all in on Barkov. That being said I still think they grab Jones.
Poirier and Dauphin aren't small.
Late happy birthday bro. May your after-birthday be better!
Okay, lets forget size, Petan, Dauphin, Poirier and Subban, happy now ? Boys, I know these guys are skilled, but we need to size and toughen up. One of these guys ( not Subban ) , fine, but more than one, no thanks. Remember, balance.
For some people, it has to start at 6'3''.....Personnally, I'm also looking at how build they are. While Dauphin does seem more in the frail category, Poirier isn't.
Poirier and Dauphin aren't small.
Thanks!!
As long as the Habs get one of Burakovsky, Zykov, McCoshen, Poirier, Jarry, Nastasiuk, Dickinson, or Bailey.. I'll be happy.
As has been repeatedly posted here, draft the most skilled players available. With literally dozens of quality free agents available this summer, what ever 'balance' you are seeking can be obtained through free agency. Take the best player available regardless of size, ethnicity or hair colour. It's the only way to build a winning team.
I will miss the draft tomorrow, I need an IPHONE APP that sends me every pick, especially the first round, please?
I'm with you with most of them....Honestly, as the draft approaches, I'm feeling like I will be really dissapointed to not get Poirier. But there's so many others out there.....Dickinson and Bailey, well I'm not going to be dissapointed. I mean, any sane person won't be. Yet, they will have to convince me as they progresses....Goalie wise, I'm with you with Jarry. Q wise, Desrosiers and Bibeau are it for me.
Dauphin is 6 and Poirier is 6'1" WTF??
At some point you have to make some concessions.
Do you take another small player in Petan and say his upside is 60-80 points
Or do you add a rugged player like Nastasiuk and say his upside is 40-60 points.
Obviously, in this EXAMPLE, Petan would be the BPA but if you want to build a winning team, Nastasiuk brings more to the table than just skill.
There's a lot of jealousy here on teams like Chicago, Detroit, Boston and once upon a time, New Jersey.
They have a team concept in mind and draft players to fit this philosophy. You cant bank on signing free agents, sometimes they don't come here and most of the time, they are at free agent market value, meaning you spend more on that player than you would if you drafted him.
The Habs might have their own philosophy but my philosophy is to acquire depth, surround 3-4 skilled players with rugged guys who can chip in 20-25 goals and 40-50 points and win with 3 lines that can produce on any given night. The back-end features skilled puck movers anchored by guys who can hti and block shots but also can make a first pass.
Thanks!!
As long as the Habs get one of Burakovsky, Zykov, McCoshen, Poirier, Jarry, Nastasiuk, Dickinson, or Bailey.. I'll be happy.
Excited guys?
Excited guys?
Pleaseeeee
Thanks!!
As long as the Habs get one of Burakovsky, Zykov, McCoshen, Poirier, Jarry, Nastasiuk, Dickinson, or Bailey.. I'll be happy.
Heatherington is a right hand shot also, why do you prefer Santini ?
Poirier and Dauphin aren't small.
At some point you have to make some concessions.
Do you take another small player in Petan and say his upside is 60-80 points
Or do you add a rugged player like Nastasiuk and say his upside is 40-60 points.
Obviously, in this EXAMPLE, Petan would be the BPA but if you want to build a winning team, Nastasiuk brings more to the table than just skill.
There's a lot of jealousy here on teams like Chicago, Detroit, Boston and once upon a time, New Jersey.
They have a team concept in mind and draft players to fit this philosophy. You cant bank on signing free agents, sometimes they don't come here and most of the time, they are at free agent market value, meaning you spend more on that player than you would if you drafted him.
The Habs might have their own philosophy but my philosophy is to acquire depth, surround 3-4 skilled players with rugged guys who can chip in 20-25 goals and 40-50 points and win with 3 lines that can produce on any given night. The back-end features skilled puck movers anchored by guys who can hti and block shots but also can make a first pass.