If you're going to discredit him for the team sucking for a 3 week stretch (although he himself was playing very elite during that stretch), then give him credit for speeding up the learning curve of Palat and Johnson, there's no way they adapt as quick without playing with MSL for that 3 month span. He provided leadership and stability after the Stamkos incident (obviously this is overlooked at the moment) and before the annoucement of the Olympic team, even after getting cut he stepped his game up to another level (career high 10 game point streak) instead of throwing a self-pity party. But yeah I guess 3 weeks> 5 months of great hockey.
The way I look at it, is, did he hurt more than he helped? The captaincy means you must lead your team. That rut we were in after the trade request, players would look to their captain in that situation. But the captain didn't want to play for us. Yeah, he still did well individually, but it honestly didn't help our team as a whole more than it helped himself.
You're talking as if he was only playing on the team for 3 weeks, he was here for 6 months and 62 games, are you arguing that those 3 weeks had more of an impact (negatively) than what he did (positively) in the other 5 and half months he was here?
By far the leading scorer on the team before he left, and the highest producing ES/PP player on the team before he left, 42 ES points in 62 games, Palat finished as the team leader with 44 in 82 games.