crazedcanuck
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2005
- 455
- 0
I know it's early, but anyone have any thoughts on this, I've found nothing in my searches so far.
I know it's early, but anyone have any thoughts on this, I've found nothing in my searches so far.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=187009&hubname=Contrary to popular belief, NHL revenues are not expected to ''flatline'' this season. Sources indicate owners will be told that ''medium growth'' is expected at this point, which means the US$44-million, team-by-team salary cap will raise again next season, although not nearly as much as the $5-million jump from last year when revenues blew away initial projections.
While NHL attendance is down about one per cent across the board, balancing things out is the fact that most clubs raised tickets prices this season, so gate receipts overall are up compared to last year at this time.
If current revenues hold - about another $1-2 million per team based on first quarter estimates.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=187009&hubname=
The Satellite Hot Stove on HNIC said the same as TSN. Revenues up in the first quarter. If it holds then a small increase in the cap next year.I don't believe that at all. They are saying this because that's the company (NHL) line and they are sticking with it. Ratings are down in the US and Canada, attendance is way down pretty much accross the board, etc...
Last season it ws 39-mil, and I believe it's going to end up pretty much back at that point, maybe more like 41-42, but it definetaly won't go up.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=187151&hubname=Saskin: Cap will increase next season
Canadian Press
12/4/2006 5:49:00 PM
PALM BEACH, Fla. (CP) - The team-by-team salary cap in the NHL is expected to rise to between US$46 million and $47.5 million next season.
Despite lower attendance in some markets, the league's total revenues are on thre rise. This salary cap is currently $44 million
Welcome to reality. Prices for *everything* go up year after year.
So much for the lockout being for lower ticket prices, they will have to keep raising tickets each year to make up for even or lost attendance.
i wont dig up the quotes again, but Bettman most definatly sold the sheep that the lock out would make tickets affordable for everyone.
i guess its just lawyer double talk, but all us educated business of hockey people already knew this. its just that the majority of hockey fans fell for it hook line and sinker.
i still know people who refer to the owners lockout as a strike. when they are corrected, they simpy say "whatever". like its the players fault, no matter what.
Absolutely. The level of lemminglike behaviour around here during the lockout was absolutely disgraceful. It's like nobody could think for themselves.
The lockout wasn't about improving the equality of tha game, it was about ensuring profit, any benefits the fans may have seen were merely offshots from that. .
The idea that ticket prices would stay down was always more then a little naive. The owners aren't out there spending their money on a charitable cause, they want to make money. The Players aren't the only one's worried about the bottom line, the owners wan't that extra dollar every bit as much.
The lockout wasn't about improving the equality of tha game, it was about ensuring profit, any benefits the fans may have seen were merely offshots from that. The fans concerns were never a real factor. Anyone thinking logically should have been well aware of that fact.
The NHL is now and will always be a business first and foremost.
Ticket prices will push to the limits of what the individual markets can possibly bare.
If that means less people can afford to see the game then it ultimately means nothing at al, just so long as those people that do pay for the tickets yield enough income to overcome whatever cheaper tickets might gain in extra fans.
It's true.
Actually, gscarpenter and I simply cut and pasted each others' posts, changing the odd word here and there.
This is what happens when you have uneducated simpletons like ourselves trying to engage in a debate with intellectual heavyweights.
It was pretty sad to watch...
btw, I'd like to see some of my old posts where I said ticket prices would be lower, just for old time's sake.
Apparently not.I don't believe that at all. They are saying this because that's the company (NHL) line and they are sticking with it. Ratings are down in the US and Canada, attendance is way down pretty much accross the board, etc...
Last season it ws 39-mil, and I believe it's going to end up pretty much back at that point, maybe more like 41-42, but it definetaly won't go up.
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...0&call_pageid=1044442959412&col=1044442957278NHL notes: No way but up for salary cap
NHL expects 4 to 5 per cent revenue growthDec. 5, 2006. 01:00 AM
The team-by-team salary cap in the NHL is expected to go up to between $46 million and $47.5 (U.S.) million next season.
The NHL market of choice is not the average fan but rather the corporate ticket holder. They have been quite successful in that strategy which has been the foundation of Bettman's marketing campaigns.The idea that ticket prices would stay down was always more then a little naive. The owners aren't out there spending their money on a charitable cause, they want to make money. The Players aren't the only one's worried about the bottom line, the owners wan't that extra dollar every bit as much.
The lockout wasn't about improving the equality of tha game, it was about ensuring profit, any benefits the fans may have seen were merely offshots from that. The fans concerns were never a real factor. Anyone thinking logically should have been well aware of that fact.
The NHL is now and will always be a business first and foremost.
Ticket prices will push to the limits of what the individual markets can possibly bare.
If that means less people can afford to see the game then it ultimately means nothing at al, just so long as those people that do pay for the tickets yield enough income to overcome whatever cheaper tickets might gain in extra fans.
god damn it, Timmy, you are NOT SUPPOSED TO SAY THAT!!!!It's true.
Actually, gscarpenter and I simply cut and pasted each others' posts, changing the odd word here and there.
This is what happens when you have uneducated simpletons like ourselves trying to engage in a debate with intellectual heavyweights.
It was pretty sad to watch...
btw, I'd like to see some of my old posts where I said ticket prices would be lower, just for old time's sake.
god damn it, Timmy, you are NOT SUPPOSED TO SAY THAT!!!!
Frigging confidentiality agreements ... aren't worth the paper they are printed on.