this sorry debate will go on forever.
at least in the 80s they made the playoffs quite a few times. there was hope. they had some name-brand players like Vaive, Sittler, Clark, Palmateer, just to name a few.
The mid-2000s on the other hand were possibly darker. No playoffs in a decade? After Sundin left, who were our guys? Antropov? Ponikarovsky or whatever the f his name was? Who were our goalies? Trevor Kidd, Toskala, Raycroft, Telqvist.. I mean, come on
The 80s were bad with all the Ballard antics, but as I said it was a 21-team league and they at least qualified for the Stanley Cup playoffs several times.
The mid-2000s were a lot more empty and hopeless in my honest opinion. There were no antics, no playoffs, no name-brand players for a long, long time, and no hope in sight.
Between 80/81 and 90/91, Leafs were 21st out of 21 teams in terms of points. Most losses. At least between 05/06 and 14/15 the Leafs were ahead of Edmonton, Florida, the Isles, and Columbus. Only reason they made the playoffs six times in the first period is because they were in the worst division in hockey where all they had to do was be better than the Dead Wings to slot into the playoffs. Only won two playoff rounds that entire time. Never once had more wins than losses in a season. Only won 32.8% of their games. Had a league worst -714 goal differential. The post-lockout Leafs at least had six seasons with more wins than losses, won 44.1% of their games total. Only had a -279 goal differential, 3rd worst in the league. Less playoff appearances, but what were the playoffs in the 80s other than getting beat up by the Blues & Hawks 3 or 4 more times?
You cite Sittler & Palmateer as '80's players'. Sittler played a season and a half into the 1980s before Ballard dumped him off to Philly, a seven week trade process that ended off with Sittler mentally depressed. Overall, really messy situation. Palmateer played two crappy years in the 80s with Toronto after he had already left for Washington and messed up his knees. He was bad, borderline like when CuJo returned in 08/09. No way you can cite those names as 80s stars. Those were holdovers from the moderately decent 70s era. One could much just as easily justify citing Sundin, McCabe, Tucker, and Belfour as part of the post-lockout era of darkness, and those are just as much "name-brand" players as the likes of Mike Palmateer.
As far as actual 80s stars go...Leafs had Vaive, Leeman, old Salming, Damphousse, Derlago, Anderson, Fergus, Frycer, Ihnacak, and Olcyzk as their top ten scorers. Couple other 'famous' names like Clark, Iafrate, Courtnall, Paiement, Thomas had small impacts in the 1980s. Hardly a more talented group than the likes of Kessel, Kaberle, Sundin, Phaneuf, van Riemsdyk, McCabe, Lupul, Blake, Bozak, Grabovski, Kadri, Steen, etc. I don't really consider the 1980s to be better for 'name-brand' players, or overall talent in general. Obviously names like Vaive or Leeman are well known for their 50 goal seasons that the inflated scoring totals of the 1980s allowed them to hit, but they weren't better players than the likes of Kessel or Lupul. Guys like Clark, Damphousse have name recognition because of what they did later in their careers, mostly in the 1990s, and in the case of Damphousse, not even on the Maple Leafs.
The way that Ballard ran the franchise into the ground, and tainted relations with starts such as Keon, McDonald, and Sittler was far darker on and off-ice than the Burke era. Yes, the Leafs post-lockout were incompetent, one of the worst teams, but at least there was no petty owner, starting from the top, corrupting the entire team. In the cap era, with the draft, there was always at least hope of a turn around.