haak84
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2017
- 4,141
- 2,310
Couldn't catch the game today at all. Was the lopsided shots any indication of any dominance?
19 of 39 shots from the D
Couldn't catch the game today at all. Was the lopsided shots any indication of any dominance?
That IS cherrypicking though. You're completely WRONG with this.It is a bit funny you are accusing people of cherry picking when what you are saying is the exact definition of cherry picking.
Removing stats because it doesn’t fit your narrative is cherry picking.
Cory magically having a strong second half absolutely changes how you approach him. He isn’t going to actually have one because he is too broken, but if by some miracle he did you can’t just disregard it.
That would be really really stupid.
Say he has a .920% stretch to end the season over 25 games.I'd have to disagree. If Cory by some miracle has that kind of success to finish the season, and passes the eye test, e.g. very few softies, then they would be wise to at least not buy him out.
Him having a strong remainder of the season and keeping him one more year wouldn’t be the worst thing. It would buy an extra year which in turn buys us two years without having to have the buyout cap hit. I’d look to use a compliance buyout the next year provided a new CBA comes into play. Or use a regular buyout. Management just can’t be fooled into thinking this means he’s good again. A 20-25 game stretch of strong play from Schneids does not indicate he’s fixed or even decent. It just means that he’s a poor tender having a good stretch of work. It might show that he’s still serviceable and can be relied on to be the backup for one more year. He can’t be the starter or go-to for multiple reasons. Besides performance issues he’s shown that he’s too beat up and unreliable physically for that gig anymore.I'd have to disagree. If Cory by some miracle has that kind of success to finish the season, and passes the eye test, e.g. very few softies, then they would be wise to at least not buy him out.
I've seen this said before, but how often do we actually see NHL guys loaned out to Europe? Huet is the only goalie I can think of it happening to in the last I don't know how many years. We did it with Pikkawhateverhisnamewas, but I'm pretty sure he was on a one year deal and just had whatever was remaining that year left on it.I mean we all get a good laugh about Lou LTIR'ing people but I don't think they can literally just LTIR Cory on a whim, unless we've become one of the golden teams that they'll let him have some 'skin disease'. It's more likely they kick him overseas and just eat the entire contract the next three years, or two years before buying out the last year. Or trade him 50% retained and take back another lesser bad contract.
I do agree that next year the goaltending tandem is likely patchwork starter for a year or two/Blackwood backup. Until recently I thought Kinkaid could be the patchwork starter but now they have to make a clean break I think, all his goodwill from last year is gone.
But as I've argued, his presence on the team (having to rely on him as a goaltender, even just the backup in his current state) hurts the team more than his actual contract. If it were allowed, I'd be all for paying him to go away next year, having his entire cap hit on the books for 19-20, then hoping the new CBA has an amnesty clause the next year and buying out then.GMs find all kinds of interesting ways to get rid of bad contracts so I'm not worried about dealing with Cory. Plus, while his contract is an eyesore, it shouldn't actually hurt us for a few years, and by then the buyout would be for a shorter period of time and probably easier to swallow for ownership (who I would imagine would like to pay Cory to not play for them as few years as possible).
I'm more worried about trying to find a starting goalie solution for next year. While Kinkaid has done an admirable job over the last calendar year, I don't trust him to be a 50+ game starter. The absolute best case scenario would be Blackwood continuing to play well and earning the starter's job, but I don't know how likely that is.
Although if we don't figure out something defensively it's not going to matter who is in goal anyway. The kind of defensive breakdowns this team has would require some MVP level goaltending, and pretty much anybody we bring in is likely going to have some question marks.
I'll never cheer against wins, no matter how low in the standings we are, but what I am fed up with is the amount of OT losses.After January 1st I expect ray to start selling. We are now tied with LA at the bottom of the league. Stockpile picks and prospects
Hynes blaming the goaltenders, when his system has no defensive structure
That's a fair point from you, but when we're seeing stinkers like the third goal go in today regularly, you gotta blame the goaltending.Hynes blaming the goaltenders, when his system has no defensive structure
.851% is almost historically bad. He's got some balls if he's blaming Hynes or the structure. That's not even respectable in the worst defensive system in the history of hockey in the year 2018. He shouldn't be throwing shade at anyone, other than maybe the medical staff for allowing to go back on the ice again in his condition. Not saying they're definitely to blame or that he shouldn't be cleared, but it's one or the other. Him or the medical staff to blame.I wonder if Cory Schneider throws some shade at Hynes because he's not getting ANY help.
I wouldn't put up with that ****.
That's a fair point from you, but when we're seeing stinkers like the third goal go in today regularly, you gotta blame the goaltending.
I give Kinkaid more of a pass just because he wasn't signed to be the starter here and he's had to be the starter for the last almost calendar year, due to incompetency at the position.
.851% is almost historically bad. He's got some balls if he's blaming Hynes or the structure. That's not even respectable in the worst defensive system in the history of hockey in the year 2018. He shouldn't be throwing shade at anyone, other than maybe the medical staff for allowing to go back on the ice again in his condition. Not saying they're definitely to blame or that he shouldn't be cleared, but it's one or the other. Him or the medical staff to blame.
That's a fair point from you, but when we're seeing stinkers like the third goal go in today regularly, you gotta blame the goaltending.
I give Kinkaid more of a pass just because he wasn't signed to be the starter here and he's had to be the starter for the last almost calendar year, due to incompetency at the position.
.851% is almost historically bad. He's got some balls if he's blaming Hynes or the structure. That's not even respectable in the worst defensive system in the history of hockey in the year 2018. He shouldn't be throwing shade at anyone, other than maybe the medical staff for allowing to go back on the ice again in his condition. Not saying they're definitely to blame or that he shouldn't be cleared, but it's one or the other. Him or the medical staff to blame.
I don't think Cory is coming back (if by coming back, you mean coming back to playing at even an average level over a full season or more) under any coach. It's not Hynes fault or his systems fault that Cory can't stop wraparounds, leaves the short side open, lets in horrific goals and can't keep a routine glove save from bouncing between his legs and into the back of the net.No, it's not.
But you know it's a matter of time before Blackwood's game regresses. No goalie is going to have the proper mentality to win games if the backdoor isn't covered, 2 on 1's multiple times per period because of fancy blue line drop passes, and bad man to man D that leaves a forward out of position down low.
Cory should know by now that he's not coming back with Hynes behind the bench and his contract won't be bought out.
That's fair, but the goals where poor goaltending hurts you aren't the backdoor goals or goals like the second goal against today. It's the same thing with when I said the own goals in the Anaheim game aren't what's causing Cory's play to be that bad this year. It's the other goals he allows that leave no margin for error.Sure, but when you see backdoor goals scored against every game... it's really getting stupid.
Even if it's not a bad contract, we shouldn't be signing it. We already have one very bad goalie contract on the books, that's either going away after this year by way of buyout or LTIR. The only way it won't go away is the absolute worst case scenario that Schneider is injured, but not injured bad enough to never play again, then he can't be cleared to be bought out.kinkaid can bounce back. he was around the same goalie at this point last season. he has played poorly but the bigger issue on this team is coaching and chemistry. kink at 2 years and 3 million is not a bad contract. look at the other goalie contracts in the league.
The power play not scoring is a big problem and this is something Kowalsky runs.
Another problem (no pun intended) is that any thing that people claim is a problem, is often times refuted and shot down by someone else.
''Goaltending is a problem'' is met by some with ''No it's not! The defense is bad! Goaltending is NOT the reason this team is where it is!''
''Zacha has 5 points and 0 assists and is supposed to be our second line center'' sometimes gets a ''Well, the team scores enough! Zacha isn't a problem! Offense isn't a problem!''.
Or ''Hynes sucks! Hynes is the problem!'' is sometimes met with a ''Well it's not Hynes fault the goalies can't stop enough shots or that Wood or Zacha can't score more''.
ALL of these things are major problems right now.