#2 pick in the draft

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by Dr_Chimera*, Apr 11, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dr_Chimera*

    Dr_Chimera* Guest

  2. XX

    XX Sticky Icky Icky

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2002
    Messages:
    45,302
    Likes Received:
    2,694
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Location:
    PHX
    I think they will trade down a few spots to the Coyotes Rags or Panthers and still get a good player and some prospects, if not a few more picks.
     
  3. EroCaps

    EroCaps Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    16,725
    Likes Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    Virginia
    They'll take Malkin if available, take it to Vegas.
     
  4. DR. Holiday

    DR. Holiday Guest

    Agreed not a tough choice between the two at all. Malkin is the more skilled and the more polished. Guess you need to write about something.
     
  5. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    39,248
    Likes Received:
    3,678
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    It doesn't make sense. Malkin is what the Penguins need. They already have a crapload of prospect depth.
     
  6. Aaron Vickers

    Aaron Vickers FC Hockey

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,347
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    Managing Editor, FC Hockey
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Home Page:
    I'll agree.

    They've got good depth at forward in terms of prospects, but really lack a high profile forward prospect. Going with Malkin, they can't really go wrong.
     
  7. DaveG

    DaveG Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    41,331
    Likes Received:
    12,748
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Brewer/Medical Software
    Location:
    Winston-Salem NC
    Awards:
    I really can't see the Pens passing on Malkin unless another high profile prospect and a first were heading back their way in the trade. I seriously don't see that happening, and I'm sure the Pens don't mind that at all. They need an elite power forward type of player, and that's what Malkin brings to the table.
     
  8. craig1

    craig1 Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2002
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Financial Manager/Scholar
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Home Page:

    Malkin is not a Power Forward.

    Power Forward is the most overused analogy in the NHL today, behind "Franchise Player."

    Shanahan is a Power Forward. Cam Neely was a Power Forward. Lindros was/is a Power Forward. Kevin Stevens was a power Forward. Bertuzzi is a power Forward.


    Malkin is not.

    A power forward is not just someone who is big. A power forward plays a rough and tumble in your face game. Someone who can score 35 goals in todays NHL (otherwise you are a 3rd line grinder), while still racking up 150 PIM's.

    Malkin does not play soft, but he is not a huge banger. He plays a tough game, but not a Power Forward game. He is a playmaking Center with a great scoring touch, who is difficult to move off the puck due to his size and strength. He is also supposedly polished in the defensive zone............The best analogies to his game so far have been Joe Thornton with better hands and vision...........and yes, Thornton is not a true Power Forward..........Yet.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2004
  9. Big McLargehuge

    Big McLargehuge Registered User

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    68,999
    Likes Received:
    1,272
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    S. Pasadena, CA
    Hardly.

    Malkin is heads and shoulders above the rest besides Ovechkin.

    And the Penguins know it.
     
  10. Foppa_Rules

    Foppa_Rules Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,019
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Cheering for sports teams
    Location:
    Earth...how about you?
    Ovechkin is leagues ahead of Malkin.
     
  11. Big McLargehuge

    Big McLargehuge Registered User

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    68,999
    Likes Received:
    1,272
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    S. Pasadena, CA
    as I said...besides Ovechkin.

    Ovechkin is alone on the first tier, Malkin alone on the second, Barker, Olesz, and Schremp on the third, and so on.
     
  12. Jaded-Fan

    Jaded-Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    44,324
    Likes Received:
    3,651
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Leagues? . . . some say that, others say that the gap is less . . . what is your point? . . . we will find out as it plays out over the next few years.
     
  13. Dr_Chimera*

    Dr_Chimera* Guest

    Well, on the bright side, at least it wasn't the usual time-waster article from redline.
     
  14. DJ Spinoza

    DJ Spinoza Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2003
    Messages:
    17,700
    Likes Received:
    267
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Gender:
    Male
    It depends on how they view guys who might be selected fifth or sixth, but I agree with your overall point.

    Take Tukonen for example. He's scoring well early on in the U18 tournament, and maybe management likes him a lot. Maybe they aren't quite sold on Malkin. So they make a trade with Phoenix, get their guy and something additional from Phoenix.

    Now that scenerio isn't likely, but there are some options, and it greatly depends on Greg Malone and co's list, and the offers on the table from other teams.

    It seems as though Malkin has a good scoring touch and the potential to develop into a top line player. That's something completely missing from the Penguins system, so if that is the case and the Penguins feel that way about him, I can't see them passing Malkin up. Additionally, they are pretty weak at center. They have a couple of guys like Bartschi or Eaves who might really surprise, but no one you can say with confidence is a top line center.

    There are some interesting options out there, but I'd be very surprised if Craig Patrick acted on them.
     
  15. HockeyMan9

    HockeyMan9 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Home Page:
    "Yeah, the bright side."
     
  16. Big McLargehuge

    Big McLargehuge Registered User

    Joined:
    May 9, 2002
    Messages:
    68,999
    Likes Received:
    1,272
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    S. Pasadena, CA
    Thanks to Ryan Malone every time I see Malone in a paper I'm thinking "why is Ryan talking about prospects?"

    Takes me a second to realize they're talking about Greg.

    Wonder how long this will take me to get used to it...I mean I know Greg is our head scout, and has been for a while, but it's just something that I can't help.

    :banghead:
     
  17. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    39,248
    Likes Received:
    3,678
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    You need to get off of Ovechkin's jock. This thread isn't even about Ovechkin and yet you're still finding ways to squeeze him into the conversation.
     
  18. WOTR

    WOTR Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2003
    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I am just curious why you feel this. I am not testing you, but sincerely interested. How many times have you seen both , Olesz and Malkin play, and what did you see that led you to this conclusion?
     
  19. Jaded-Fan

    Jaded-Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    44,324
    Likes Received:
    3,651
    Trophy Points:
    186

    I can not speak for him of course, but can tell you how I came to similar conculsions . . . Likely the same way we all have . . .from reading a bunch of scouts opinions which I have been keeping up with ever since it became clear that the Pens would be in the running for a top player . . . ie, since last year . . . :lol . . .

    Consensus was Ovechkin . . .drop . . .Malkin . . .big drop . . . everyonelse

    The only variation with scouts that I have seen is a growing thought in the last six month that Malkin has closed the gap so that the drop, though there, is not as big between Ovechkin and Malkin, and a bit of discussion that one or two have made the leap so the big drop between Malkin and them is now only a drop . . . but no where have I read that Malkin has overtaken Ovechkin, nor have I read that anyone has overtaken Malkin at number two . . . from what I have read, current consensus seems to be:

    Ovechkin . . . slight drop . . . Malkin . . . slight drop . . . one or perhaps two below
    . . . big big drop
     
  20. Luigi Lemieux

    Luigi Lemieux Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    17,716
    Likes Received:
    1,880
    Trophy Points:
    231
    a few scouts may have said that, but the overwhelming majority of the hockey world considers ovechkin to be the best prospect to come along in a while. your very own craig patrick considers ovechkin to be "head and shoulders" above every one else in the draft. malkin may turn into a star, but to say it's only a slight drop from ovechkin to malkin is ludicrous.

    i've only seen clips of both so i'm just going by what i read, but the consensus i'm seeing is : ovechkin...big drop...malkin...slight drop...olesz, barker, schremp, ladd, tukonen.

    not getting ovechkin may be a good thing for pittsburgh. maybe it will get rid of this city's perception that you need the best player in the league to be a good team. the late 90s penguins that limped into the playoffs every year on jagr's back only to lose in the first or second round is not my idea of building a contender. we're finally doing it right and pitt fans should just be happy we're getting a great player, and not worry so much that we're not getting ovechkin.
     
  21. Jaded-Fan

    Jaded-Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    44,324
    Likes Received:
    3,651
    Trophy Points:
    186
    I've never seen any of the players, My remarks are just impressions of what I have read, and that is no knock on Ovechkin, just that from what I have been reading Malkin has been coming on . . . as has Olesz . . . and that the gap at the beginning of the year has closed from a huge gap to a much closer one, most of that based on preformance imporvement as well as potential of Malkin (who is still growing) where Ovechkin is already there. Actually the quotes from scouts surprised me, pleasantly, as mentioning Malkin anywhere near the same breath as 'the best to come along in twenty years' means something. The quotes have been posted here often, I have yet to see ones where anyone has said that Ovechkin remains as hugely ahead as he was a year ago. That includes CP who seemed downright suicidal in remarks when it seemed that we would emerge from last place (and that was all about Malkin, not Ovechkin . . .true, he would rather have had Ovechkin as we all would, but he wanted to at least have Malkin). And CP said that two were head and shoulders above the rest, and we assured ourselves of getting one of them.
     
  22. Luigi Lemieux

    Luigi Lemieux Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    17,716
    Likes Received:
    1,880
    Trophy Points:
    231
    http://www.startribune.com/stories/1330/4709069.html

    craig patrick said, after we locked up last place : "there's two great players in this draft, and we're going to get one of them."

    what has malkin been doing to close the gap? he's been injured for two months. i'm not saying you're wrong, but i don't see it.
     
  23. Jaded-Fan

    Jaded-Fan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    44,324
    Likes Received:
    3,651
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Just as I said above, a reading of the various quotes we all have seen. I am an attorney by trade, so am used to having two very different views of the same fact patterns . . . which is nothing to be too alarmed about, the fun thing is that we will get an answer as to the reality of the two players within a few years. To be honest in a league where the scoring title is won with (not looking this up right now but I am close in the following) 94 points (only 41 goals) there will be no Mario-like numbers, so if both live up to their hype we are talking maybe a few goals and assists separating them anyways.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"