Let's talk matchups!
Lemieux, Harvey & co vs. Howe, Shore and co.
I assume this is what we're getting both home and away. The Clarke line is my matchup line every time I have any say over it, and I don't see a checking line on Ted's team that has any business playing 18 minutes at the expense of Lemieux's group. Regarding the 5 individual player vs. player matchups, Ted's centre and my #2 defenseman are about a tier and a half better than their counterparts. My first and second-best wingers are both better than Ted's and his #1 defenseman is better than mine, all by smaller amounts than the first two comparisons. I have the best overall player on the ice (Howe), Ted has the 2nd, 3rd and 4th best (Mario, Harvey, Hull), but also the weakest links out there. So if these two lines aren't perfectly even, they're at least close enough to look at who's facing who at ice level.
One thing that jumps out is that both Howe and Hull have certifiable sociopaths to deal with on their side of the ice. I'd say Howe has a better history of continuing to play his game while getting assaulted regularly than Hull does, though if he just hauls off and beats Cleghorn to a bloody pulp, that's ultimately a pyhrric victory if I have to play without him for 5 minutes. I don't have exact head-to-head results for Lindsay and Harvey at my fingertips, but they both had their time in the sun as key players on 1950s dynasties. There's no one I'd want more to drive Lemieux to distraction than Bobby Clarke, but he (and Shore) may have to play even more conservatively than usual. This might by a good place to give Potvin a bit more rope as he's sharing his ice with the less-concerning Jari Kurri (Kurri's good, but we're in rareified territory here).
So a great matchup here to go punch for punch, but where things may get hairy is that Ted's two strongest defensive players (Harvey and Kurri) are both on the opposite side of the ice from Howe, and handing Kurri centre's responsibilities here might be a bit of a waste against my least dangerous player (Clarke). I think there's an opening here for Gordie to really lead the charge offensively.
The middle six matchups and home ice
Here's where we might want different guys facing each other. I won't speak for Ted, but I think it's a pretty good assumption that he wants Guy Lafleur crossing the blueline against Hod Stuart, and man, what can I say about that in a 4-team ATD? Very good chance that the Flower just lights it up in Ted's 3 home dates. I'm not sure if he's got any solid ideas about which pair plays with which line most of the time, but he's going to have to pick his poison when sending Pronger out against either Bossy or Mikhailov, and expect a certain amount of damage from the other one against Georges Boucher.
But I've got the home seed and I have a pretty good idea what I want to happen 4 out of 7 times. So here we go:
Howie Morenz, Earl Seibert & co vs Nels Stewart & co.
I think I have a drastic mismatch here. Morenz is gritty, responsible and can skate circles around Stewart, and I've got Seibert to thump him around in the slot when he tries to set up there. Phillips and Hextall is a good pair of wingers for Stewart, but nothing this pair can't handle. I'm not sure which pair of defensemen Joliat and Bossy have to contend with, but pairing their centre Morenz with a slower, defensively indifferent Stewart means they'll be defending odd man rushes more than they'd like. If it's Pronger and Kelly we're getting, the preference is to hold on to the puck as long as possible - dump ins mean we have to forecheck against Red Kelly and we'd like to minimize that. If it's Boucher and J. Stewart, I think we're going to spend a lot of these shifts in the Firebirds' zone.
Newsy Lalonde, Slava Fetisov & co vs Joe Sakic & co.
Ted has the more talented forward line here, and I won't try to argue otherwise, but I think putting Sid Abel on Sakic in the defensive zone and Slava Fetisov on Lafleur's side is an adequate defensive plan for the two biggest threats here. On the other side, I think Ted's getting very little from either of his wingers when it comes to pressuring Fetisov and MacInnis, and I'm pretty OK with Lalonde, Mikhailov and Abel trying to grind it out on the boards with either pair of defensemen. If it's Pronger, they might not get much done offensively, but they've got enough spunk to at least make it boring.
Richard & co vs Trottier & co
Henri Richard and Bryan Trottier playing 4th line shifts against each other might be the most beautiful or the most boring thing anyone's ever see, but they're both up to it. Trottier has the flashier offensive totals, but Richard is actually ahead of him in even strength VsX, and if either of these guys see a moment of power play time we'll know something has gone terribly wrong. Blair Russell and Cecil Dillon vs. Jack Walker and Hooley Smith? Boooooooooring. Like, I think my pair of wingers is a little better, but to what end? These shifts will go exactly how our coaches intend them to, which is to say nothing will happen.
Patrick Roy vs Glenn Hall
I'm of the mind that the team with the better goalie overall has the more meaningful advantage over the better playoff goaltender when it's a question, but in this case I can confidently choose Patrick Roy for both questions. I don't consider Hall a weakness of the Firebirds, but Roy is a clear strength.