I will rage if Huby gets a better rating than Landeskog... It kinda defies logic.
I will rage if Huby gets a better rating than Landeskog... It kinda defies logic.
Lando should be a B. Huberdeau will have a higher numerical rating probably, but would have a C. 8B Lando 8.5C Huberdeau would've been a pretty accurate way, but each fanbase has a diff person doing it so w/e
What should it be?
To me Klefblom is a bigger risk than Seimens, hence why some teams didn't risk a higher draft pick on him.
Klefbloom should have a D and Seimens should be a C or Seimens should be an 8.5C
That's absurd to put him at an 8.5 C
There's a reason why Scheifele was drafted ahead of Couturier.
There's a reason why Scheifele was drafted ahead of Couturier.
His upside is higher, but not as safe as Landeskog.
Hubs should have the same as RNH, but maybe a with a little bigger risk of reaching that potential.
Yeah, because the scouting staff was from a team that got relocated because of how poorly their drafting and developing was.