Shootertooter
Registered User
- Feb 20, 2016
- 3,676
- 1,487
The Ottawa Senators would like to offer The Ottawa Senators for the 1st pick.
The Ottawa Senators would like to offer The Ottawa Senators for the 1st pick.
This is a troll thread bc nj says no to pettersson
NJ says no, worse offer than EP.This is an interesting proposal, as Toronto may be running into cap issues, and trading Marner for futures would end any concerns about cap.
Marner for 1st overall 2019. What does Toronto say?
Might be close to fair value, but we don't really need Gaudreau as we have Hall. I doubt most other NJD fans would be interested, but if you guys were to offer something like Monahan + Hanifin + your 1st this year I'd be quite tempted, but that's mostly because I think Monahan gets a lot of undeserved hate and I also think he'd fit our needs like a glove.I'd offer Gaudreau. I think it's overpayment on our end but that's what it would take.
We definitely would not and that is why a bitter canucks fan started this threadWhy would we trade 1OA for EP
The new Ryder halak 2nd ?Maple Leafs offer Zaitsev + Brown + 2nd
Maple Leafs offer Zaitsev + Brown + 2nd
The last #1 pick to be traded was in 2003, which was pick #1 and a 3rd rounder for Samuelsson, pick #3 and a 2nd rounder. So I suppose something similar to that right now would be #1 to Colorado for #4, Jost and a 2nd rounder? I expect people to grossly overvalue the #1 pick in here OFC, but that's what precedent suggests the cost should be.
This is an interesting proposal, as Toronto may be running into cap issues, and trading Marner for futures would end any concerns about cap.
Marner for 1st overall 2019. What does Toronto say?
The new Ryder halak 2nd ?
Please tell me this is a joke. You realize not every draft is the same, right? In 2003, most pundits had Staal #1, but felt there was little separating him and Horton. Fleury was one of the most dynamic goalie prospects to come around at that time, propelling him into the conversation for top pick. Any one of those guys could have gone 1st, anyone could have gone 3rd. You’re a Pens fan, do you think that logic applies to the 2005 draft?
Some drafts your suggestion would be fair, but not this draft. There’s a top two, then a drop. Could Byram end up being the best player from this draft 10 years from now? Certainly, but as it sits now the safer bets are Hughes and Kakko.
That's hilarious that you think Hughes is even remotely comparable to 18 year old Crosby.
Maybe you can compare it to 2004, but even then it's iffy. Hughes and Kakko is comparable to Patrick and Hischier.
No it’s more comparable to Mathews and LaineThat's hilarious that you think Hughes is even remotely comparable to 18 year old Crosby.
Maybe you can compare it to 2004, but even then it's iffy. Hughes and Kakko is comparable to Patrick and Hischier.
Agreed. I would quickly take either Hughes/Kakko over Patrick/Hischier.I disagree. The former two are more highly regarded IMO.