jghockey
Registered User
- Aug 14, 2018
- 204
- 38
Does anyone have a a video of the documentary, "Orchestrating an Upset’ Documentary on ’96 World Cup"?
Last edited by a moderator:
No, but I'd like to see it. It's been 22 years, I have gotten over that loss and recognize it now as some insanely entertaining hockey that I wish would be played in international tournaments with that sort of passion nowadays.
As USA fan it might be a bigger victory than 1980 just because we finally had our best out there and we beat the best. However we lucked out in a way by Canada not having Lemieux,McInnis, Bourque, and Kairiya.
The World Cup 1996 was a downer for TEAM CANADA fans, Had Bourque and Lemieux decided to play (and both were injury free) and decided to turn their back on Team Canada It would have been Team Canada most likely to come out on top, but Team USA played awesome and RICHTER was Hot. It boiled some Canadians when they saw a Photo of BOURQUE and LEMIEUX playing Golf while the guy’s who love to play for their Country for Free was trying to Win the Gold.
On a side note it was also a bit controversial when MESSIER said he found it hard to play against his NY Ranger Teammates in the Tournament which might have led to his non participation in the 1998 Olympics.
Never less it helped the AMERICAN’s and other than the high stick Goal by HULKL it was a great series.
Totally, Just like RUSSIA in 1981 the Team USA of 1996 deserved to Win.Team Canada did kinda choke there. The final game was a toss-up, but some poor coaching by Sather (why was he there to begin with?) and some timely plays by Hull and others made the US deservedly win.
Yeah, Bourque and Lemieux... I mean, Bourque was starting to get up there and Mario had had injuries and so on... It struck me as odd that Mario wasn't arsed in 1996 but then he was so eager in 2002.
Anyway, full marks to the US for that win.
This does look better, although I think Verbeek (if he must be on the team) should play with Messier, as they had amazing chemistry during 1995-96.Gretzky - Lindros - Fleury
Brind’Amour - Sakic - Messier
Primeau - Yzerman - Shanahan
C. Lemieux - Linden - Verbeek
Totally, Just like RUSSIA in 1981 the Team USA of 1996 deserved to Win.
I agree with your points on SATHGER being the Coach and as always some of the Picks were wrong (as always with Team Canada). Plus Sather putting “Damphousse & Linden” on Gretzky’s Line was a Joke.
Team Canada did Not Play their Best & we’re Flat in Game #2 & #3
It should have been a better Team and a Better Line Combination.
Gretzky - Lindros - Fleury
Brind’Amour - Sakic - Messier
Primeau - Yzerman - Shanahan
C. Lemieux - Linden - Verbeek
A whole lot of smothering going on nowadays! Canada has more or less perfected the game, to everyones including their own's chagrain.The last time international hockey was fun to watch even if we lost. With the exception of the 02 gold match.
Didn't even watch the recent world cup, micky mouse tournament.
Ya i know what u mean about VERBEEK with MESSIER,This does look better, although I think Verbeek (if he must be on the team) should play with Messier, as they had amazing chemistry during 1995-96.
I would have liked to see Gretzky play with Yzerman and Shanahan.
Unfortunately it does not seem to have been that many options on that roster, but Joseph had most certainly reached at least his prime with a couple of high award placings by then even though the season just before was not one of them. But besides all that, a 2.31 GAA does not seem too bad in a tournament i remember as fairly offensive minded. Canada's semi against Sweden was spectacular.Was goaltending considered a shaky spot for Team Canada throughout the tourney? Cujo had not yet reached his prime and there were a LOT of other options.
As USA fan it might be a bigger victory than 1980 just because we finally had our best out there and we beat the best. However we lucked out in a way by Canada not having Lemieux,McInnis, Bourque, and Kairiya.
My main takeaway from that 1996 final was Mike Richter's performance. It was one of the best I have ever seen.
I wonder if I watch it again today if I would have the same opinion.