(1974/5/5) Stanley Cup Playoffs Semifinal Game 7 - NY Rangers at Philadelphia (NBC)

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,796
98,908
Cambridge, MA



upload_2019-9-13_19-18-52.png


The winner of this game would play the Bruins for the Cup

It would be Eddie Giacomin's last playoff game as a Ranger.

Tim Ryan and Ted Lindsay with the call as seen on NBC


Previous editions:

(1971/4/8) Round 1 Stanley Cup Playoffs Game 2 - Montreal at Boston
(1968/3/10) Toronto at Chicago
(1959/4/07) SCSF Game 7 - Toronto Maple Leafs at Boston Bruins

(1966/4/14) Toronto Maple Leafs vs Montreal Canadiens
(1960/4/7) Montreal Canadiens vs Toronto Maple Leafs
(1963/4/18) Toronto Maple Leafs vs Detroit Red Wings
(1963/12/7) Toronto Maple Leafs vs Chicago Black Hawks
(1965/4/1) Montreal Canadiens vs Toronto Maple Leafs
 
Last edited:

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,875
Between his infamous Schulz fight and unintentionally injuring Jean Ratelle in 1972, Dale Rolfe might be the unluckiest player in Ranger history.
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,796
98,908
Cambridge, MA
The Flyers has a great regular season but the establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

Funny how that first expansion class of 67-68 has worked out in winning the Cup

Pittsburgh 5
Philadelphia 2
Los Angeles 2
St. Louis 1
Minnesota Dallas 1
Oakland Cleveland 0
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Super Fadio Bro

MAMA MIA!!!
Jan 12, 2009
5,573
383
Somewhere
The Flyers has a great regular season but the establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

Funny how that first expansion class of 67-68 has worked out in winning the Cup

Pittsburgh 5
Philadelphia 2
Los Angeles 2
St. Louis 1
Minnesota Dallas Oakland Cleveland 0

The Stars won the cup in 1999
 

c9777666

Registered User
Aug 31, 2016
19,892
5,875
The establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

How would the Rangers have matched up against Boston in a hypothetical '74 Cup Final, ratings aside?
 

Fenway

HF Bookie and Bruins Historian
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2007
68,796
98,908
Cambridge, MA
How would the Rangers have matched up against Boston in a hypothetical '74 Cup Final, ratings aside?

Rangers had knocked Boston out the year before but the Bruins were weak in goal that year with Cheevers gone to the WHA and Eddie Johnston fighting injuries - the Bruins even tried Jacques Plante at the end.

1974 Giles Gilbert took over and did well. Bruins would have been heavy favorites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarantula

Bluesguru

Registered User
Aug 10, 2014
1,957
823
St. Louis
I love this game, got it saved on USB and watch it once in a while when trying to fall asleep at night. I know this game by heart - ha.

Phenomenal game. Really feel the Rangers were the better team. That penalty at the end of the game in the final couple minutes really killed NY. They were really bringing the heat on Philly. Lots of talent on that Ranger squad. Brad Park was such a smooth customer out there. Giacomin was one great goalie. Flyers were a great team. Rick MacLeish really complemented Clarke well. Probably didn’t get the ink he deserved.
 

Bluesguru

Registered User
Aug 10, 2014
1,957
823
St. Louis
How would the Rangers have matched up against Boston in a hypothetical '74 Cup Final, ratings aside?

I think they matched up very well. Definitely a 6 or 7 game series either way. Park vs Orr. Good stuff. That’s one thing Philly didnt have despite being an eventual juggernaut and that was having a Norris caliber defenseman. Quite an accomplishment IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenway

Bluesguru

Registered User
Aug 10, 2014
1,957
823
St. Louis
The Flyers has a great regular season but the establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

Funny how that first expansion class of 67-68 has worked out in winning the Cup

Pittsburgh 5
Philadelphia 2
Los Angeles 2
St. Louis 1
Minnesota Dallas 1
Oakland Cleveland 0

Still the city of Minnesota without a Cup. That’s got to hurt. Thank goodness my Blues finally got one.
 

Normand Lacombe

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
1,442
1,352
Brad Park hated the Flyers roughhouse tactics. Park said after this game that he would rather lose with the Rangers than win with the Flyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluesguru

vikash1987

Registered User
Mar 7, 2004
1,302
566
New York
For the Rangers, this loss was a bitter one to swallow. Coach Emile Francis had publicly stated that this was the year his team would finally erase the Curse. Steve Vickers’ postgame comments said it all: “We choked. We lost the big one. I wish I could play against the Rangers.”
 

PepeBostones

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 3, 2002
914
1,433
What a tremendous hockey player Bobby Clarke was. Constantly on the ice and giving 100%. They all worked hard Barber and MacLeish awesome players too. Talk about being hard to play against.

But it's kind of ironic how MacLeish, Parent, Dornhoefer, Lonsberry, Crisp and Joe Watson couldn't break into the Bruins lineup and was either traded from Boston or picked up in expansion draft from Boston. Then five six years later they came back and beat in 1974 and 1975 when Reggie Leach, who also had been drafted by Boston, joined the Flyers

Love this era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

MiamiScreamingEagles

Global Moderator
Jan 17, 2004
71,230
48,220
The Flyers has a great regular season but the establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

Funny how that first expansion class of 67-68 has worked out in winning the Cup

Pittsburgh 5
Philadelphia 2
Los Angeles 2
St. Louis 1
Minnesota Dallas 1
Oakland Cleveland 0

I read a newspaper article at the time where a high percentage of New Yorkers were upset when they were informed that one of the Cup Finals' games would preempt scheduled broadcasting which included a TV show by popular comedian Flip Wilson. The local NBC outlet passed on the game which was shown on local PBS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

MiamiScreamingEagles

Global Moderator
Jan 17, 2004
71,230
48,220
What a tremendous hockey player Bobby Clarke was. Constantly on the ice and giving 100%. They all worked hard Barber and MacLeish awesome players too. Talk about being hard to play against.

But it's kind of ironic how MacLeish, Parent, Dornhoefer, Lonsberry, Crisp and Joe Watson couldn't break into the Bruins lineup and was either traded from Boston or picked up in expansion draft from Boston. Then five six years later they came back and beat in 1974 and 1975 when Reggie Leach, who also had been drafted by Boston, joined the Flyers

Love this era.
This was a quote from Bruins' head coach Bep Guidolin that I kept in my archives. It was significant. He also said "six" players on his team played well and though I don't recall if he named each but Gregg Sheppard and Wayne Cashman were two he cited.

“This team (the Flyers) gives second effort,” Guidolin said after his club’s 4-1 loss to Philadelphia Sunday. “We don’t, and if we don’t, we re in deep trouble. “The players have got to realize that they have got to work harder to beat this hockey club. They come at you all the time. They’re a hungry hockey club.... Philadelphia outhustled us in every department."

Many of the Bruins and Flyers' players were friends off the ice and much of that was because of the connection to the Bruins' farm team in Oklahoma.

Bobby Orr was the best man at Joe Watson's wedding. Earlier, when Watson was unsure of his career direction, Orr told him to sign a contract and play because of two reasons: 1. Watson could play and 2. a signed contract meant money for the family. Watson said a few times, it was a conversation that guided his professional direction.

After the Flyers won the Cup in 1974, Watson wanted to share champagne with Orr but he (Orr) refused and said something such as "that is for winners..." Watson assured Orr in so many words that he (is) a winner.

Finally, this is one of the most iconic photos of the era:

normal.jpg
 
Last edited:

Oheao

Registered User
Apr 17, 2014
663
349
London
The Flyers has a great regular season but the establishment was still pushing for the old guard. NBC was pulling for NYR to win to bolster ratings in the SCF.

Funny how that first expansion class of 67-68 has worked out in winning the Cup

Pittsburgh 5
Philadelphia 2
Los Angeles 2
St. Louis 1
Minnesota Dallas 1
Oakland Cleveland 0
The way the did the expansion made no sense, it's like they didn't even want to expand. They were essentially punishing the expansion teams for joining the league!
 

Black Gold Extractor

Registered User
May 4, 2010
3,051
4,813
The way the did the expansion made no sense, it's like they didn't even want to expand. They were essentially punishing the expansion teams for joining the league!

The way I see it is that there were a multitude of factors:

1) In some sense, it's a very exclusive club of people allowing fresh new faces to join their fraternity. There is always going to be some level of resistance from the established club, especially since the new faces are potential competitors down the road. However, I'm sure the initial pill was easier to swallow since a third round was added to the playoffs, which brings me to the second point.

2) In some ways, in terms of making and playing in the playoffs, the East Division was basically the O6 group of teams renamed. The winner of that was basically guaranteed to be the Cup winners, with the added third round a formality for the winner of the East Division (plus extra money for the winning team due to more home games).

3) In the worst case scenario (which obviously didn't come to pass), if every expansion team flopped, it would have been a failed experiment with no loss of integrity for the Cup winner. It would have sucked for the new owners, but the old guard would have made a few extra bucks and gone on with their business. Of course, the worst case scenario must have been seen as highly unlikely because...

4) Two-thirds of the expansion teams would make the playoffs, and one of the would be able to challenge for the Cup in their very first season. (Or as it turned out in reality, first three seasons.) Every team in the expansion division would get a shot in the playoffs due to parity in that conference. You could argue that none of those teams would actually stand a chance for a while (hence St. Louis being knocked from its three straight Cup runs the moment Chicago joined their division), but there's nothing that builds a fanbase better than winning playoff rounds off the bat (even if it's in the weaker division).

But back on topic: this is one awesome game. :thumbu:
 

Nerowoy nora tolad

Registered User
May 9, 2018
1,406
654
Gladstone, Australia
The way the did the expansion made no sense, it's like they didn't even want to expand. They were essentially punishing the expansion teams for joining the league!
Simplest explanation was because they didnt want to expand. @Theokritos can explain better than I can, but I think its been said the Norrises were under investigation of antitrust, AHL Cleveland launched a serious cup challenge sometime during the late Original 6 days, and as the official story notes, it was either expand and have control, or deal with the WHL as a serious competitor for big league status down the road.

Ive never quite understood the criticism of the 68-70 playoffs format. Suppose the NHL went with a format that looked like

West:

Chicago
Toronto
Detroit
Minnesota
Los Angeles
California

East:

Montreal
Boston
New York
Philadelphia
St Louis
Pittsburgh

A setup like that would have delivered a best-on-best cup final every spring, but it would have been the equivalent of putting the new clubs in a headlock and cutting off their financial air supply. The talent gap post expansion was big enough that it would have been guaranteed 3 O6 clubs at the top of each division, and one of the new clubs sneaking into the 4th spot and getting blown away in the first round for a minimum of 5 years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad