1967-68: Birth of the Big Bad Bruins

Davenport

Registered User
Dec 4, 2020
1,007
971
Toronto
For me, the 1967-68 edition of the Boston Bruins is the most fascinating. For eight straight seasons, that franchise had missed the playoffs - and (in fact) had never been close to joining the postseason excitement. In 1966-67 - the last year of the playoff drought, and the rookie season of # 4 - they won just 17 games, and accumulated 44 points (finishing 14 points behind the 5th place Detroit Red Wings). They were last in the NHL in Goals Scored (182) and worst in the league in Goals Against (253). They had just one 20-goal scorer (Pit Martin) and two players who hit the 100-PIM mark (Bobby Orr and Gilles Marotte).

Boston won 37 games in 1967-68 - 20 more than in 1966-67. Their 84 points were good enough for 3rd place in the East Division - 4 ahead of the 4th place Chicago Black Hawks. They led the league in Goals Scored (259), while allowing 216 goals. Orr had little to do with this drastic turnaround. Thanks to his knee problems, he played only 46 games, scoring 11 goals and adding 20 assists. The improvement was the result of the five new faces, four of them added through trades.

Each of the three Hawks who came to Boston in the Big Trade contributed significantly: Phil Esposito, 35 goals, 49 assists, 84 points; Fred Stanfield, 20 goals, 44 assists, 64 points; and Ken Hodge, 25 goals, 31 assists, 56 points. Eddie Shack - who was acquired in a trade made the same day as the 3-for-3 trade - had 23 goals, 19 assists, 49 points. Rookie Derek Sanderson contributed 24 goals, 25 assists, 49 points - earning himself the Calder Trophy. Thanks to the offensive production provided by the newcomers, both Johnny Bucyk (30+39=69) and John Mckenzie (28+38=66) enjoyed their best seasons so far in their careers.

In 1967-68, Boston had 5 players hit the 100-PIM mark (with Don Awrey leading the NHL with 153), while Sanderson finished with 98 PIM.

Perhaps the Bruins were a bit too successful. Their 3rd place finish earned them a first-round series against the Montreal Canadiens, who swept them in four straight games. A 4th place finish would have meant facing the New York Rangers in the first round. Chicago bounced the Blueshirts in 6 games. Maybe Boston would have done as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Stathead

Staniowski

Registered User
Jan 13, 2018
3,522
3,087
The Maritimes
Yes, that was the big year for the Bruins. They added their top 3 centres - Stanfield, Sanderson, Esposito - at the same time, and instantly had 3 good lines.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Davenport

Davenport

Registered User
Dec 4, 2020
1,007
971
Toronto
Yes, that was the big year for the Bruins. They added their top 3 centres - Stanfield, Sanderson, Esposito - at the same time, and instantly had 3 good lines.
At that point, they were still no match for the Habs, but had they faced either the Rangers or the Hawks in the first round, I think the Bruins would have won.
 

Crosby2010

Registered User
Mar 4, 2023
1,045
871
By 1969 they certainly made the Habs sweat a bit in the semis. Beliveau needed an overtime goal in Game 6 to win the series. If it goes Game 7 back to Montreal my bet is that the Habs win, but you never know, the Bruins outscored the Habs by one goal that series, and Game 1 and 2 in Montreal went to overtime. So with an Espo/Orr Bruins team on the cusp of superstardom anything could have happened.

But yes, they had arrived in 1968. The Esposito trade could be the greatest trade in NHL history when you look at context and results. Here is a funny question, we know the Bruins could not shake the Habs off of them in those days. But in 1970 and 1972 they don't play them in the playoffs. 1970 the Habs missed the postseason on the last day of the season and in 1972 the Rangers bounce them out first round. How do the Bruins do against their nemesis who they have psychological issues with if they play them in their Cup winning years?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad