ProstheticConscience
Check dein Limit
Last one over 1k again. Let's all wear out our mouse scroll button welcoming back old posters, and remember, when the other guy's upset, he's hysterical.
Continue.
Continue.
Keep a watchful eye for the next RM* alt. Wondering what name they come up with this time.
I am Ryan Miller!Keep a watchful eye for the next RM* alt. Wondering what name they come up with this time.
Oh cool, we would have possibly traded a 2nd or 3rd round pick for a stopgap solution if the draft wasn't in Vancouver this year.
Like why would you say that.....why would say "but the draft is in Vancouver" as an excuse? That directly implies that its the main reason you aren't trading a 2nd round pick for Mika ****ing Noronen.
I actually just can't get over how bad they are at communicating, and how clearly they communicate their every misstep to the public.
Who's disputing he's a starter..?...Thats pretty much a given.People are still disputing whether Jacob Markstrom is a starter? He's top 20 in SV% of 42 goalies who've played 120 games since 15/16. He's faced the 26th most shots and played the 26th most minutes.
At minimum he's an NHL starter.
And to say he's a different goalie than when he was acquired, duh, Schneider and Luongo are different than when they were traded. Bo Horvat has developed since he was traded also.
I took your post hoping he'd be a consistent #1 on the last page of the last thread as not thinking he is one. I guess I misunderstood.Who's disputing he's a starter..?...Thats pretty much a given.
HF alumnus arsmaster made a good analogy, I think:When it comes to evaluating pro talent, planning, and roster and cap management, they are just god awful. This goalie situation is a perfect example, just zero semblance of foresight for such a mundane task, instead of being proactive they waited too long. And this isn't a one off either.
Do they expect us to have faith in their ability to have a coherent vision for the team 3-4 years down the line when they seemingly can't even formulate a vision for the team 3-4 weeks down the line?
I'll say.....I've always been supportive of Markstrom...I asked the poster RandyV if he ever thought that Marky would be a #1..?...He's been with the team for 5 years,..He's 29...He was a major project back when we acquired him, went through waivers, and had to deconstruct and relearn his game in the minors...I took your post hoping he'd be a consistent #1 on the last page of the last thread as not thinking he is one. I guess I misunderstood.
Dumping a bad war consiglear like Tom Haden for Fredo.dumping trevor and putting jim benning front and centre in the media... another masterstroke by genius businessman Francesco Aquillini
*FredoDumping a bad war consiglear like Tom Haden for Credo.
It’s either gonna be something weird like Turdtastic Creep or something historic like Theodore Roosevelt.Keep a watchful eye for the next RM* alt. Wondering what name they come up with this time.
People are still disputing whether Jacob Markstrom is a starter? He's top 20 in SV% of 42 goalies who've played 120 games since 15/16. He's faced the 26th most shots and played the 26th most minutes.
At minimum he's an NHL starter.
And to say he's a different goalie than when he was acquired, duh, Schneider and Luongo are different than when they were traded. Bo Horvat has developed since he was traded also.
Keep a watchful eye for the next RM* alt. Wondering what name they come up with this time.
Dumping a bad war consiglear like Tom Haden for Fredo.
Edit .thx Jyrki
“Taking active steps to justify a move to make it seem less bad” is one they’ve done before... leading to the obvious question, “If they can see it’s bad, why do they do it?”
I think they literally just can’t say no or disappoint a player.